• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Iran Super Thread- Merged

The way I took it was, given the high altitude release point and the fact that he seemed to be talking about a cargo of 20 submunitions weighing 2.5 kg apiece, then it seemed unlikely that 8 km was the blast radius.

It seemed more likely that he was effectively talking about scattering 20 unguided light to medium mortar rounds over a circle with an 8 km radius. That would be a 200 km2 circle with 20 mortar bombs in it. Militarily ineffective I would think.
Blast radius being in the above, being the area of dispersion.

20 submunitions in a 8km wide circle.

It is a terror weapon, nothing more. Some of variants have a fragmentation payload, others an incendiary.
 
Blast radius being in the above, being the area of dispersion.

20 submunitions in a 8km wide circle.

It is a terror weapon, nothing more. Some of variants have a fragmentation payload, others an incendiary.

Agree on the principle but a disagreement on a point of pedantry. He said a blast radius of 8 km or 5 miles. The distance is from the centre of the explosion or the dispersion to the edge.

8 km wide would mean a diameter of 8 km or 5 miles.

The difference is a factor of 4.

If 8 km is the radius then the area is about 200 km2 or 200 grid squares.
If 8 km is the diameter then the area is about 50 km2 or 50 grid squares.

Either way, 20 mortar rounds in 50 or 200 grid squares, they are going to need to pump an awful lot of rockets into that target area to have any kind of militarily useful effect.

🙂
 
Agree on the principle but a disagreement on a point of pedantry. He said a blast radius of 8 km or 5 miles. The distance is from the centre of the explosion or the dispersion to the edge.

8 km wide would mean a diameter of 8 km or 5 miles.

The difference is a factor of 4.

If 8 km is the radius then the area is about 200 km2 or 200 grid squares.
If 8 km is the diameter then the area is about 50 km2 or 50 grid squares.

Either way, 20 mortar rounds in 50 or 200 grid squares, they are going to need to pump an awful lot of rockets into that target area to have any kind of militarily useful effect.

🙂
Except that specific missile only covers an area less than 10SQKM . Don't get caught up on the term he is used -- just accept the physical specifics. It is a efficient system - as it requires a Anti-Missile Missile to intercept it before payload release, and those are expensive - and it is awkward for the Phalanx type guns to engage as you need a bunch of them to cover the area - and it will release it's submunitions before it gets into range - which makes for a lot more targets.

The effect is to drain AMM's and sow fear into a population -- in this respect it seems to have an opposite effect, and just passing everyone off that. The question remains on how many AMM's have been drained - and is Iran able to continue to deplete stocks. As well as how others are seeing this - as opportunity or cause for pause.

Iran (and others) have larger unitary warheads - those landing in population sites would cause a lot more casualties -- however as they are a one piece - they only need one interception.
 
  • Like
Reactions: ytz
Except that specific missile only covers an area less than 10SQKM . Don't get caught up on the term he is used -- just accept the physical specifics. It is a efficient system - as it requires a Anti-Missile Missile to intercept it before payload release, and those are expensive - and it is awkward for the Phalanx type guns to engage as you need a bunch of them to cover the area - and it will release it's submunitions before it gets into range - which makes for a lot more targets.

The effect is to drain AMM's and sow fear into a population -- in this respect it seems to have an opposite effect, and just passing everyone off that. The question remains on how many AMM's have been drained - and is Iran able to continue to deplete stocks. As well as how others are seeing this - as opportunity or cause for pause.

Iran (and others) have larger unitary warheads - those landing in population sites would cause a lot more casualties -- however as they are a one piece - they only need one interception.

I will accept the physics.

In which case I will be forced to question the data input.
 
Anyone got a used private jet for sale? ;)

Private jet prices soar as wealthy scramble to leave Dubai

People drive to Oman and Saudi in hope of a flight, while most tourists stay stuck in hotels and on cruise ships

 
  • Humorous
Reactions: ytz
Anyone got a used private jet for sale? ;)

Private jet prices soar as wealthy scramble to leave Dubai

People drive to Oman and Saudi in hope of a flight, while most tourists stay stuck in hotels and on cruise ships

Aha! That’s where all the West Jet aircraft went, instead of taking home stranded passengers from Mexico.
 
Meanwhile, elsewhere on the edges ....
 
Will the loss of 3 Strike Eagles make any sort of noticeable difference in regards to SEAD assets in the region? Strike Eagles are what the Wild Weasels fly, right?
season 6 GIF
 
The US has been hitting what's left of the Iranian Air Force:


But despite that it seems they were still able to launch a (unsuccessful) sortie:


To be honest I'm surprised they managed to get the aircraft off the ground and far enough over the Gulf that the Qatari's were the ones to shoot them down.
 
Back
Top