- Reaction score
- 11,599
- Points
- 1,040
You go ahead and state those if you think they're important. You probably know them better than I do. They aspire to be a big fish in their pond, meddling with neighbours in general and pursuing a religious grudge match with Israel in particular. Not a wise fight to pick, but as you say, ideology. For a change they're enjoying the novelty of reacting, only the opening round has been a lot more damaging than a few rockets launched into residential neighbourhoods. At this point, Iran will have to stretch just to get back to where it was and should probably not waste much money unless it can put together a defence sufficient to prevent going through all this again. Just making it harder won't be enough - if it takes 12 weeks to do what used to take 4 weeks, they still end up replacing the same stuff again. They won't know whether it's enough until it's tested, and they won't know if the Other Side has been clever enough to figure out ways to make Iran's next set of gear just as ineffectual as the old. Their best gear and adaptations right now are apparently good enough to handle '80s aircraft with upgrades.Still struggling to think through.
Regime survival is the basic goal.
What are their stretch goals if they achieve those and how would they achieve them?
Meanwhile they have other pressing problems, and while almost anyone can close the Strait, it's much harder to force it open. Iran needs trade, too.
