tomahawk6 said:Iraq wont be stable until the militias are disbanded.
That’s a hopelessly naive assertion. Iraq has nothing even close to a stable political power structure nor civil institutions. In many areas the militias - essentially politically decentralized militaries who allegiances are local/regional, not national - are the only particularly effective armed force the government has, *so long as* the central government can retain loyalty. The die was cast on this in 2003 when Iraq’s Army was disbanded wholesale.
If, hypothetically, Iraq could enjoy a generation of reasonable political stability, armed force could hopefully be gradually consolidated under a central democratic (or quasi-democratic) government. Iraq can never achieve the greatest possible stability so long as armed force is decentralized in militias, true; but that will be putting polish on, not hammering out the dents. There are many, many steps to achieve before that.
Good2Golf said:Both points quite valid and leads one to question how much consultation from US to IRQ occurred prior to the US executing the kill chain. Let’s accept what PM Mahdi said is true for a moment and appreciate the impact of the US action on intra-Regional effort to work the Yemeni situation.
In any case, Trump appears to have effectively handed the greatest influence in Iraq to Iran. If I’m the course of doing so he also managed to inadvertently frig up efforts to simmer down another regional conflict, that is... less than ideal.
With that said I would be surprised if Soleimani had been in town as part of a sort of diplomatic interchange with Saudi Arabia without US intelligence knowing or at least strongly suspecting that fact.
What a goddamned mess.