I'll believe it when I see it.
Old school, blue pinstriped politician ,owes his loyalty to the talking head of the day! Next origional thought will be his first!The man should be retired at this point, he's almost 70, how is there not a retirement age for politicians?
I will put money on it. $50 to Army.ca
I bet that compliant Blair will now announce that Bombardier offer to replace the CP140 Aurora is open.
According to recent studies, cognitive decline starts occurring after 70, so that seems like a valid cut off
Warren Buffet and Rupert Murdoch?Just look at the US to see what happens when old white men hold onto power past their prime....
I agree - he should have stayed in Toronto and retired.Old school, blue pinstriped politician ,owes his loyalty to the talking head of the day! Next origional thought will be his first!
I'll take that bet.I will put money on it. $50 to Army.ca
I bet that compliant Blair will now announce that Bombardier offer to replace the CP140 Aurora is open.
To be implemented by the same people that brought you the Phoenix pay system!I'm betting on a 'social credit' program being introduced to the CAF to deal with all the culture shift laggards.
Luckily, there's already a SME on the subject we can borrow from
The complicated truth about China's social credit system
China's social credit system isn't a world first but when it's complete it will be unique. The system isn't just as simple as everyone being given a score thoughwww.wired.co.uk
Prove to whom? It's Bombardier located where votes are. The CF/Allies requirements be dammed.It can "Value Proposition" all they want, but Bombardier would still need to prove that they have something beyond a CGI drawing.
Picking something based on politics instead of the stated (and public) High Level Mandatory Requirements would be a great pretext for a Boeing lawsuit.Prove to whom? It's Bombardier located where votes are. The CF/Allies requirements be dammed.
EH 101 anyone?Picking something based on politics instead of the stated (and public) High Level Mandatory Requirements would be a great pretext for a Boeing lawsuit.
That's a bit different though. The Chretien govt didn't pick another thing, it just cancelled it.EH 101 anyone?
Damn, so the Trudeau gov has the option of cancelling MMA and just carrying on with CP140! That is a COA if IRC.That's a bit different though. The Chretien govt didn't pick another thing, it just cancelled it.
It'd be a different issue if the analysis proposed the EH101, and the GoC said "thanks but we're going with this thing designed in Flin Flon, which is on the back of a napkin right now but I promise will be better".
Sure, I guess - not replacing something is always a COA for any procurement project.Damn, so the Trudeau gov has the option of cancelling MMA and just carrying on with CP140! That is a COA if IRC.
Prove to whom? It's Bombardier located where votes are. The CF/Allies requirements be dammed.
EH 101 anyone?
That's a bit different though. The Chretien govt didn't pick another thing, it just cancelled it.
It'd be a different issue if the analysis proposed the EH101, and the GoC said "thanks but we're going with this thing designed in Flin Flon, which is on the back of a napkin right now but I promise will be better"
The nuclear foot-shooting option is always there…Damn, so the Trudeau gov has the option of cancelling MMA and just carrying on with CP140! That is a COA if IRC.
The Sea King “fiasco” cost Chrétien not one vote.Sure, I guess - not replacing something is always a COA for any procurement project.
But if that happens, the CPC etc would have a windfall in political ammo, even more so than the Sea King replacement fiasco.
Join AUKUS cough.
Depending on the missiles yes.Aussies, US agree to joint intel center, co-production of GMLRS - Breaking Defense
Australian defense minister Richard Marles hailed the deal as a "significant step forward" toward what he called "seamless" intelligence sharing.breakingdefense.com
Do you think Canada could be making missiles in Canada with Canadians for Canadians? And interpreting data?
Here's the Aussie slate from the article.Depending on the missiles yes.
US Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin said Saturday that the US would be “racing” to give Australia access to advanced munitions. In the AUSMIN joint communique issued after the speeches, the two countries said they would produce Lockheed Martin’s Guided Multiple Launch Rocket System munition. On top of that, they “reaffirmed their commitment to address global supply chain constraints and to transfer technical data for the M795 155mm artillery shell in support of future production in Australia.” And the foreign and defense ministers said Australia and the US would speed to maintain, “repair, overhaul, and upgrade” MK-48 heavyweight torpedoes and SM-2 missiles in Australia.
“This can’t happen soon enough,” tweeted Ashley Townshend, senior fellow for Indo-Pacific security at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, who called the deal “excellent news.” Townshend added that he would like to eventually see agreements for Australia that sees the Lucky Country “be part of manufacturing and stockpiling missile systems like LRASM, JASSEM-ER, SM6, HIMARS, and Tomahawks,” although those systems were not mentioned in the communique.
Well be a good partner...Here's the Aussie slate from the article.