• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending


I think the Premiers have realized that not spending 2% of GDP on defence is now a net liability that is threatening our economy due to the US and to a lesser degree Europe looking at everything through a security lens.
 

I think the Premiers have realized that not spending 2% of GDP on defence is now a net liability that is threatening our economy due to the US and to a lesser degree Europe looking at everything through a security lens.
Most also realize that it's a great opportunity for pork barrelling for favoured providers. aka ISI, IMP, GDLS...
 
I wonder if the Feds are taking notice of the Royal Navy’s recently announced plans to retire and/or sell off several of its ships, including HSS Bulwark and Albion. I understand those ships are pretty long in the tooth. Could they be refurbished without too much fuss or would it end up being another Victoria-class fiasco?
 
I wonder if the Feds are taking notice of the Royal Navy’s recently announced plans to retire and/or sell off several of its ships, including HSS Bulwark and Albion. I understand those ships are pretty long in the tooth. Could they be refurbished without too much fuss or would it end up being another Victoria-class fiasco?
The RCN already has too many warships with excessive costs to refurbish. No need to import more.
 
I wonder if the Feds are taking notice of the Royal Navy’s recently announced plans to retire and/or sell off several of its ships, including HSS Bulwark and Albion. I understand those ships are pretty long in the tooth. Could they be refurbished without too much fuss or would it end up being another Victoria-class fiasco?
You be better off leasing the Wave Class tankers, laying up a couple of the CFP's and provide the USN with tanker support till the RN needs them back or the enough River Class are commissioned.
 
Does every discussion board have a cadre who religiously believe in buying falling-down money pits as the path to achieving adequacy at low cost?
 
Does every discussion board have a cadre who religiously believe in buying falling-down money pits as the path to achieving adequacy at low cost?

Isn't that the CAF's longer term Plan A? ;)

e.g.,

 
Most also realize that it's a great opportunity for pork barrelling for favoured providers. aka ISI, IMP, GDLS...
Yep. Cue the Canadian Business Council (or whatever they’re called) also calling on further defence spending “to support national sovereignty”
 
Most also realize that it's a great opportunity for pork barrelling for favoured providers. aka ISI, IMP, GDLS...
It's not pork barrelling when you develop and fund the necessary industry to create and maintain a viable security force.

It's long overdue progress.

My concern is more in the nature of DND turning vital defence dollars into yet more PYs and civil servants in cubicles in Ottawa rather than hard steel. Now that's pork barrelling.

🍻
 
I wonder if the Feds are taking notice of the Royal Navy’s recently announced plans to retire and/or sell off several of its ships, including HSS Bulwark and Albion. I understand those ships are pretty long in the tooth. Could they be refurbished without too much fuss or would it end up being another Victoria-class fiasco?
the latter
 
Does every discussion board have a cadre who religiously believe in buying falling-down money pits as the path to achieving adequacy at low cost?
To be fair, there is a very good chance that a significant number of the CFP's will fail and be out of service for years, by the time the their River Class replacement are commissioned and is serviceable.
 
Back
Top