• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Trudeau
  • Premiers all support 2%
  • Canadians support 2%
  • Europeans support >>2%

3:39PM

Europe should welcome Trump’s calls to boost military spending​

Europe should welcome rather than rebuff Donald Trump’s call for other NATO members to ramp up their military spending, said Donald Tusk, the Polish prime minister.

“We shouldn’t be irritated. We shouldn’t be appalled,” Tusk told the European Parliament on Wednesday. “Some think it’s extravagant or it is a brutal or malicious warning.”

Mr Tusk added that Europe’s “time of comfort” was over and urged European leaders to bear a greater share of responsibility for its own security.

”Only an ally can wish another ally to get stronger. This is not what an opponent of Europe would say,” he said.

 
Further to...

9:05AM

‘Trump is right, we don’t spend enough on defence,’ says EU​

The EU’s top diplomat Kaja Kallas has urged the bloc to heed Donald Trump’s demand to spend more on defence, as she told members to prepare for war with Russia.

“President Trump is right to say that we don’t spend enough. It’s time to invest,” Ms Kallas said, adding that the United States must remain Europe’s “strongest ally”.

“Russia poses an existential threat to our security today, tomorrow and for as long as we underinvest in our defence,” she said during a speech at the annual conference of the European Defence Agency.

Mr Trump said earlier this month NATO members should spend 5 per cent of GDP on defence – a huge increase from the current 2 per cent goal and a level that no NATO country, including the United States, currently reaches.

“Time is not on Russia’s side. But it’s not necessarily on ours either. Because we are not yet doing enough. There should be no doubt in any of our minds that we must spend more to prevent war. But we also need to prepare for war,” Ms Kallas said.

 

Attachments

  • 1737568376454.png
    1737568376454.png
    536.1 KB · Views: 0
2% is so yesterday. Europeans are getting on board 3.5%, which is Trump’s mid-point in a bracketed negotiation to increase to 5%.

Canada will likely begrudgingly expedite 2% and moan about most of NATO pushing to achieve 3.5%
 
2% is so yesterday. Europeans are getting on board 3.5%, which is Trump’s mid-point in a bracketed negotiation to increase to 5%.

Canada will likely begrudgingly expedite 2% and moan about most of NATO pushing to achieve 3.5%
If it involves spending more money, of course Canadians is moan about it, its part of our culture.
 
2% is so yesterday. Europeans are getting on board 3.5%, which is Trump’s mid-point in a bracketed negotiation to increase to 5%.

Canada will likely begrudgingly expedite 2% and moan about most of NATO pushing to achieve 3.5%
If we fixed our infrastructure and housing problem, increased our manning limit so that the reg force was actually at 80% strength (IE full peacetime strength) and not using class B's to hide the problem, and actually outfit the force properly, like 3 actual tank regiments, 3 full artillery regiments, etc I bet we would be at 3% pretty quickly.
 
If we fixed our infrastructure and housing problem, increased our manning limit so that the reg force was actually at 80% strength (IE full peacetime strength) and not using class B's to hide the problem, and actually outfit the force properly, like 3 actual tank regiments, 3 full artillery regiments, etc I bet we would be at 3% pretty quickly.
I’d suggest that it’s possible for the CAF to easily absorb 5%, or even 10%…

The issue needs to be focused on what capabilities does the GOC require from the CAF, what are the additional wants, and willing to fund.
 
The issue needs to be focused on what capabilities does the GOC require from the CAF, what are the additional wants, and willing to fund.
Bet you could kick that can (capability planning) down the road, just run a decade of infrastructure fixes, and get above 3%, too.
 

Nato chief: ‘Crazy’ ethical investing is harming European defence​

Mark Rutte warns that ethical investment rules are ‘destroying the European defence industry’


Mark Rutte, general secretary of the transatlantic military alliance, said that finance companies were withholding money from defence companies after effectively putting them into the same category as drug dealers and pornographers.

He blamed ESG (environmental, social and governance) rules, which are used by many big banks, asset managers and pension funds to decide where to invest savers’ money.

Speaking at a side event in the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, Mr Rutte said: “We still are not able to explain to the pension funds, to the banks, the difference between illicit drugs and pornography on the one hand and spending on our collective defence on the other.


All over Nato we produce in a year, in terms of ammunition, what Russia is producing in three months,” he said.

“So this is evidence that we have huge problems, and that’s why my plea is, yes, we are safe now but in four or five years, if we do not ramp up production and do not ramp up spending, then we are really into difficulty.”

The Dutchman reiterated that Nato’s spending target of 2pc of GDP was “clearly not enough”, amid calls by Donald Trump, the US President, for European countries to shoulder more of the burden.

He said discussions about higher government spending by Nato states were under way and a deal would be hammered out at a gathering in June.

As noted above....

2% is the floor, not the ceiling. More will be asked.
 
As noted above....

2% is the floor, not the ceiling. More will be asked.
3% is the floor realistically. You may want to start planning for a 4% and 5% CAF, or your not going to get the option to plan, you will just get a >$120B bill annual from us…
 
3% is the floor realistically. You may want to start planning for a 4% and 5% CAF, or your not going to get the option to plan, you will just get a >$120B bill annual from us…

Payable in WCS oil?
 
Back
Top