• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Justin Trudeau hints at boosting Canada’s military spending

Germany breaking rules to finance defence.... and infrastructure.




...

Magical accounting.

Coming soon to Ottawa?

It’s not magical accounting it’s borrowing against one’s future to ensure a future.

Consider it like a mortgage for the country.

Debt shouldn’t be something to run up trivially, but I’d suggest that National Defense is a little bit more important these days.
 
Also, with some of those bases, they weren't exactly closed, but downsized and the reg force assets moved out (1 RCR used to be in London, 3 PPCLI used to be Chilliwack).
Just to be pedantic, 3 PPCLI was never stationed in Chilliwack. They were at Work Point Barracks in Victoria, which was also closed. 1 CER, CFSME, and CFOCS were in Chilliwack at the time of closure. The only remaining military presence in Chilliwack that I am aware of is the HQ of 39 CER which is housed in the former 1 CER HQ building.
 
Oh goodie, who gets to tell the hotel the previous residents/ inmates want to move back in .
It was a good divestment. Like many heritage buildings, maintenance cost was becoming excessive, and the space would not meet modern training needs.

The CAF needs heritage exemptions to let them raze old, non functional buildings.
 
No- it's nothing like that at all.

It's recognizing that the shit tonne of people that do find a way to make it work in the area, because that's where they were raised, where their roots are, where they choose to live equals a massive employment and recruitment pool, if the terms of employment can be made to work for them.

"What do we need to do to make location X an attractive/tolerable posting for serving members from elsewhere" is a fundamentally different question than " how can the local population from location x contribute to fixing the recruitment/retention overall personnel shortage issue if things were done differently"
The problem with this sort of solution is it only works for essentially the Cbt arms, where you put hundreds of people from the same trade in a single location. What about all the smaller support dets that are required to keep the modern kit functioning, and keep the rest of the support functions alive?

When you have a det/section of 8 Veh Techs or 4 FSAs, how do you provide them with advancement and opportunity if they stay in that small det? We aren't struggling to fill the battalions as much as we are struggling to fill the support jobs that tend to work in small dets, and require somewhat frequent postings due to promotions.
 
It’s not magical accounting it’s borrowing against one’s future to ensure a future.

Consider it like a mortgage for the country.

Debt shouldn’t be something to run up trivially, but I’d suggest that National Defense is a little bit more important these days.

Agree Kevin.

It is a worthwhile expenditure. But it is a worthwhile expenditure whether it comes out of general revenues or is separately recorded.
 
The problem with this sort of solution is it only works for essentially the Cbt arms, where you put hundreds of people from the same trade in a single location. What about all the smaller support dets that are required to keep the modern kit functioning, and keep the rest of the support functions alive?

When you have a det/section of 8 Veh Techs or 4 FSAs, how do you provide them with advancement and opportunity if they stay in that small det? We aren't struggling to fill the battalions as much as we are struggling to fill the support jobs that tend to work in small dets, and require somewhat frequent postings due to promotions.
Please note that I said "contribute to fixing" not "solve".

I'm not going to claim to be an expert, 
But I suppose my first question would be -do they really need to be provided with advancement and opportunity if staying in that small det provides with stability, a good living, a fulfilling career? Is promotion driven instability a feature or a bug?

The majority of civilian 310T's, skilled tradesmen, etc. get certified and then work their lives as journeymen, adding a side qual here and there - often spending years and decades working at the same small local company. The small minority do any kind of ladder climbing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: QV
But I suppose my first question would be -do they really need to be provided with advancement and opportunity if staying in that small det provides with stability, a good living, a fulfilling career? Is promotion driven instability a feature or a bug?
People join the CAF for a good job, and for opportunities, otherwise they'd be the local tradespeople.

The majority of civilian 310T's, skilled tradesmen, etc. get certified and then work their lives as journeymen, adding a side qual here and there - often spending years and decades working at the same small local company. The small minority do any kind of ladder climbing.
The majority of the local tradespeople aren't expected to go away for months at a time on course or deployments.

Now, that does raise one interesting point though, could some of the local "urban cohort" support be turned into contracted/PS civilian support? My guess is yes. That means we still need a robust deployable group of supporters posted elsewhere, to go out into the field and on deployment to provide frontline support outside the urban core.
 
Please note that I said "contribute to fixing" not "solve".

I'm not going to claim to be an expert, 
But I suppose my first question would be -do they really need to be provided with advancement and opportunity if staying in that small det provides with stability, a good living, a fulfilling career? Is promotion driven instability a feature or a bug?

The majority of civilian 310T's, skilled tradesmen, etc. get certified and then work their lives as journeymen, adding a side qual here and there - often spending years and decades working at the same small local company. The small minority do any kind of ladder climbing.
Exactly, and there would still be advancement, just locally. Staying at the same level for longer periods also helps develop mastery of the basics.
 
People join the CAF for a good job, and for opportunities, otherwise they'd be the local tradespeople.

The majority of the local tradespeople aren't expected to go away for months at a time on course or deployments.
With respect, I think conceptually bundling deployments and courses in with postings is a mistake- as is the assumption that people only join the CAF because of the path to CWO.

The decision to accept a career where there will be periodic short term aberrations and intrusions into an otherwise fairly "normal" family life with geographic stability within your home area, is a fundamentally different prospect than the decision to accept the same intrusions, but into a family life of cross country transience without the stability.

Remember, you don't need the majority of the mechanics and bookkeepers within the 50km radius to join, you need enough to fill your 8 and 4 person dets.
 
It's still active but not like when it was the home of both the armoured's and infantry's schools before they were consolidated in Gagetown with the artillery's. Borden has a small training area but Meaford is only a short drive to the northwest. During my younger days we routinely went live firing there and I expect the southern Ontario units still do with the 4th Div Trg Centre there.

🍻

FYI Borden is a very busy base, its probably the busiest training base in the CAF.

It houses CFLTC, CF Fire Academy, MP Academy, Chaplian School, TDO School, RCEME School, Med/Dent School, 16 Wing, 3rd Ranger Patrol Group, CFSATE (RCAF Tech School), RCAF Academy and 400 Tac Hel Sqn. I am sure I am missing some.

CFLTC (Logistics School) alone trains the largest branch in the CAF. Tie in the Med/Dent School, RCEME and RCAF Tech School and you probably have half the CAF being trained there at some point.

If you have ever tried to book a room in Borden you know that it can very difficult.

Borden is already a massive training base with 5-8k personal there throughout the year both RCN, army, airforce. It has a massive footprint, but if you started moving or standing up operational units there, it wouldn't work, already you have members living an hour or more from base due to housing costs, the training area is limited in size similar to CFB edmonton so youd need to go else where for major exercises, and the base already struggles to staff its kitchens during the summer ARes surge. youd be hard pressed to increase that year round

FTFY
 
And yet, how many hundreds of thousands if not millions of Canadians are making it work within a 1, 1.5 hour drive- many if not most on less than Corporal pay. Brings to mind @FJAG 's tiered/ non post-able service agreements.

Why not try to be better and offer something more to those scores of people you talk about ? Call it a recruiting effort!

Just because the average Canadian deals with it, doesn't necessarily mean we should.
 
Why not try to be better and offer something more to those scores of people you talk about ? Call it a recruiting effort!

Just because the average Canadian deals with it, doesn't necessarily mean we should.
I clarified down thread from that initial post.

Think about it like a series of concentric circles.

On the outside you have all the pool of people conceptually willing to do a job for a given amount of money.

Next step in, you have the smaller group of those people that are also willing/desirous of doing so in a military environment day to day.

Next step in, you have the smaller group of those people, that are also willing/desirous of the shorter term intrusions (and potential danger) of deployments.

Finally step in, you have the smaller group of those people, that are also willing to do all of the above PLUS be posted around the Country every 2-3 years.

That last group is not large enough for the CAF's needs. Would the group above it be?
 
The mobility requirements for CAF members differ radically between occupations and ranks. There does need to be professionalization of the career management function to reduce some of that friction, to avoid assholes posting two people across the country who were both planning to retire in the location they were posted out of, both within a year or two, just so they could swap jobs.
 
Why not try to be better and offer something more to those scores of people you talk about ? Call it a recruiting effort!

Just because the average Canadian deals with it, doesn't necessarily mean we should.
Most employers don't try and restrict you to living within 30 minutes away either. The CAF needs to increase quality of life in order to keep people. Talk to any instructor posted to RCEMES, majority hate being posted to borden, especially if you have a family because you can't find housing easily on a MCpl/Sgt pay for a family of 4 and not be in traffic for 4 hours a day. If we had enough PMQs in every case that wouldn't be an issue.
 
Back
Top