I'll believe it when I see it.
Germany breaking rules to finance defence.... and infrastructure.
![]()
Germany’s future coalition partners to relax debt rules to boost defence budget
Conservative alliance and Social Democrats to propose exempting spending of more than 1% of GDP on defencewww.theguardian.com
...
Magical accounting.
Coming soon to Ottawa?
Just to be pedantic, 3 PPCLI was never stationed in Chilliwack. They were at Work Point Barracks in Victoria, which was also closed. 1 CER, CFSME, and CFOCS were in Chilliwack at the time of closure. The only remaining military presence in Chilliwack that I am aware of is the HQ of 39 CER which is housed in the former 1 CER HQ building.Also, with some of those bases, they weren't exactly closed, but downsized and the reg force assets moved out (1 RCR used to be in London, 3 PPCLI used to be Chilliwack).
And you were doing so well..
Didn't one of the buildings get turned into some sort of convention space ?How about reopening London as a full base?
An old armoury was sold and converted into a hotel - the Delta Armouries.Didn't one of the buildings get turned into some sort of convention space ?
Oh goodie, who gets to tell the hotel the previous residents/ inmates want to move back in .An old armoury was sold and converted into a hotel - the Delta Armouries.
It was a good divestment. Like many heritage buildings, maintenance cost was becoming excessive, and the space would not meet modern training needs.Oh goodie, who gets to tell the hotel the previous residents/ inmates want to move back in .
The problem with this sort of solution is it only works for essentially the Cbt arms, where you put hundreds of people from the same trade in a single location. What about all the smaller support dets that are required to keep the modern kit functioning, and keep the rest of the support functions alive?No- it's nothing like that at all.
It's recognizing that the shit tonne of people that do find a way to make it work in the area, because that's where they were raised, where their roots are, where they choose to live equals a massive employment and recruitment pool, if the terms of employment can be made to work for them.
"What do we need to do to make location X an attractive/tolerable posting for serving members from elsewhere" is a fundamentally different question than " how can the local population from location x contribute to fixing therecruitment/retentionoverall personnel shortage issue if things were done differently"
It’s not magical accounting it’s borrowing against one’s future to ensure a future.
Consider it like a mortgage for the country.
Debt shouldn’t be something to run up trivially, but I’d suggest that National Defense is a little bit more important these days.
Please note that I said "contribute to fixing" not "solve".The problem with this sort of solution is it only works for essentially the Cbt arms, where you put hundreds of people from the same trade in a single location. What about all the smaller support dets that are required to keep the modern kit functioning, and keep the rest of the support functions alive?
When you have a det/section of 8 Veh Techs or 4 FSAs, how do you provide them with advancement and opportunity if they stay in that small det? We aren't struggling to fill the battalions as much as we are struggling to fill the support jobs that tend to work in small dets, and require somewhat frequent postings due to promotions.
People join the CAF for a good job, and for opportunities, otherwise they'd be the local tradespeople.But I suppose my first question would be -do they really need to be provided with advancement and opportunity if staying in that small det provides with stability, a good living, a fulfilling career? Is promotion driven instability a feature or a bug?
The majority of the local tradespeople aren't expected to go away for months at a time on course or deployments.The majority of civilian 310T's, skilled tradesmen, etc. get certified and then work their lives as journeymen, adding a side qual here and there - often spending years and decades working at the same small local company. The small minority do any kind of ladder climbing.
We do, PRes units!If only we had elements of the army scattered around the countryside to meet people where they live.
Ummm…Borden is an active Base.Out of curiosity, why couldn't Borden be made into an active CAF base? Its less than 30mins from Barrie (and rapid transit into downtown Toronto and Pearson). It would definitely appeal, I'm assuming, to those younger CAF members, with and without families.
Exactly, and there would still be advancement, just locally. Staying at the same level for longer periods also helps develop mastery of the basics.Please note that I said "contribute to fixing" not "solve".
I'm not going to claim to be an expert,
But I suppose my first question would be -do they really need to be provided with advancement and opportunity if staying in that small det provides with stability, a good living, a fulfilling career? Is promotion driven instability a feature or a bug?
The majority of civilian 310T's, skilled tradesmen, etc. get certified and then work their lives as journeymen, adding a side qual here and there - often spending years and decades working at the same small local company. The small minority do any kind of ladder climbing.
With respect, I think conceptually bundling deployments and courses in with postings is a mistake- as is the assumption that people only join the CAF because of the path to CWO.People join the CAF for a good job, and for opportunities, otherwise they'd be the local tradespeople.
The majority of the local tradespeople aren't expected to go away for months at a time on course or deployments.
It's still active but not like when it was the home of both the armoured's and infantry's schools before they were consolidated in Gagetown with the artillery's. Borden has a small training area but Meaford is only a short drive to the northwest. During my younger days we routinely went live firing there and I expect the southern Ontario units still do with the 4th Div Trg Centre there.
![]()
Borden is already a massive training base with 5-8k personal there throughout the yearbothRCN, army, airforce. It has a massive footprint, but if you started moving or standing up operational units there, it wouldn't work, already you have members living an hour or more from base due to housing costs, the training area is limited in size similar to CFB edmonton so youd need to go else where for major exercises, and the base already struggles to staff its kitchens during the summer ARes surge. youd be hard pressed to increase that year round
And yet, how many hundreds of thousands if not millions of Canadians are making it work within a 1, 1.5 hour drive- many if not most on less than Corporal pay. Brings to mind @FJAG 's tiered/ non post-able service agreements.
I clarified down thread from that initial post.Why not try to be better and offer something more to those scores of people you talk about ? Call it a recruiting effort!
Just because the average Canadian deals with it, doesn't necessarily mean we should.
Most employers don't try and restrict you to living within 30 minutes away either. The CAF needs to increase quality of life in order to keep people. Talk to any instructor posted to RCEMES, majority hate being posted to borden, especially if you have a family because you can't find housing easily on a MCpl/Sgt pay for a family of 4 and not be in traffic for 4 hours a day. If we had enough PMQs in every case that wouldn't be an issue.Why not try to be better and offer something more to those scores of people you talk about ? Call it a recruiting effort!
Just because the average Canadian deals with it, doesn't necessarily mean we should.