I'll believe it when I see it.
CF will not be much improvement over JT.I'm just spitballing here, but I think that if the Deputy PM had her way based on the current situation, we'd probably pull a Germany right now.
curious if there will be an actual difference in performance and outcomes between the two and why exactly. Is ministerial performance a matter of competence or government priortiesI’m just glad we don’t have the architect of Medusa as minister right now
I'll believe it when I see it. Maybe this Russian action has shook the post modernist fairy tale world
Don't discount the possibility of a split appearing between Liberal Doves and Hawks.
IIRC that the German invasions of 1939/40 tore a few ruling governments apart over similar disagreements.
Which reminds me, I'll have to stock up on some fresh beer so I can be properly equipped to watch any potential upcoming internecine struggles!
I would say competence over gvt priorities. One can still be competent in a department despite gvt priorities. And it would seem that the best COA is to send your most competent types when something is a priority. The last thing we need is incompetence when something becomes a priority due to outside forces beyond our control.curious if there will be an actual difference in performance and outcomes between the two and why exactly. Is ministerial performance a matter of competence or government priorties
Britain should increase defence spending to the same level as the US, Jeremy Hunt has proposed, as he declared: “Peace comes from strength, not luck.”
Writing for The Telegraph, the former foreign secretary called the invasion of Ukraine “the biggest failure of Western foreign and security policy in our lifetimes”.
“It happened because we forgot the most fundamental lesson of the Cold War: the power of deterrence,” he said.
By “announcing they would not intervene” if Russia invaded Ukraine, the UK and US undercut their attempted deterrence, he argued.
“Instead of peace through strength we caused war through weakness,” he wrote.
Hopefully were not reading too much into this. I fear the greatest impediment to any improvement will be the CAF itself and the CDS as it has been in the pastI would say competence over gvt priorities. One can still be competent in a department despite gvt priorities. And it would seem that the best COA is to send your most competent types when something is a priority. The last thing we need is incompetence when something becomes a priority due to outside forces beyond our control.
Strangely and by coincidence we got what appears to be a competent one exactly because fixing the CAF sexual misconduct and leadership issue became a priority. It just so happened that this crisis happened on her watch. Lucky us. Hopefully it will lead to some much needed changes but we’ll see.
Hopefully were not reading too much into this. I fear the greatest impediment to any improvement will be the CAF itself and the CDS as it has been in the past
A contributing factor, to be sure, and primarily the battle between the relatively introspective environmental/service stovepipes and the joint force development trying to work the larger picture. ECS can still have huge impact that can either help or hider the overall effort…Hopefully were not reading too much into this. I fear the greatest impediment to any improvement will be the CAF itself and the CDS as it has been in the past
Same.I'll believe it when I see it. Maybe this Russian action has shook the post modernist fairy tale world
Make me a reasonable offer and maybe you could convince me to stay , I'm thinking at least 50k retention bonus , maybe a little higher to account for inflationary pressures.
Make me a reasonable offer and maybe you could convince me to stay , I'm thinking at least 50k retention bonus , maybe a little higher to account for inflationary pressures.
It isn't unreasonable seeing as how they spent $$$$$millions of dollars training me in different trades.
I mean if Chrystia Freeland and co offered me enough money, they could even get me to set foot in but the money would need to make putting my neck on the line worth it.
I'm sure the "the CAF is paid extremely well for people with a high school education" responses will be coming shortly, as they always do.Make me a reasonable offer and maybe you could convince me to stay , I'm thinking at least 50k retention bonus , maybe a little higher to account for inflationary pressures.
It isn't unreasonable seeing as how they spent $$$$$millions of dollars training me in different trades.
I mean if Chrystia Freeland and co offered me enough money, they could even get me to set foot in but the money would need to make putting my neck on the line worth it.
The 50k resigning bonus is essentially a downpayment on a Condo where I live atm. So I don't think it's even that unreasonable a request if they aren't going to be able to provide me with suitable accommodationI'm sure the "the CAF is paid extremely well for people with a high school education" responses will be coming shortly, as they always do.
The eventual 1.5-2.5% per year pay increases, that will come in three years, will keep people around and happy...
What I find interesting is that despite rising housing costs, nobody up the chain decided to look into building more/better barracks, apartments, and RHUs. It wasn't hard to see that eventually housing costs would reach a point that the average CAF member wouldn't be able to buy into the market if they weren't already in. Occupations are already facing issues with not being able to move people because they can't afford to live in the location we want them to go to. Recruiting 50K more people won't help us if they all release within the first 4-5 years because we moved them places they can't afford to live.
Agreed, more PMQs, and apartment style barracks for single folks . We need to realize that the Canadian housing market needs to be out of the picture for CAF bases. We have tons of land, not the budget or the will.I'm sure the "the CAF is paid extremely well for people with a high school education" responses will be coming shortly, as they always do.
The eventual 1.5-2.5% per year pay increases, that will come in three years, will keep people around and happy...
What I find interesting is that despite rising housing costs, nobody up the chain decided to look into building more/better barracks, apartments, and RHUs. It wasn't hard to see that eventually housing costs would reach a point that the average CAF member wouldn't be able to buy into the market if they weren't already in. Occupations are already facing issues with not being able to move people because they can't afford to live in the location we want them to go to. Recruiting 50K more people won't help us if they all release within the first 4-5 years because we moved them places they can't afford to live.
The 50k resigning bonus is essentially a downpayment on a Condo where I live atm. So I don't think it's even that unreasonable a request if they aren't going to be able to provide me with suitable accommodation
Agreed, more PMQs, and apartment style barracks for single folks . We need to realize that the Canadian housing market needs to be out of the picture for CAF bases. We have tons of land, not the budget or the will.
That, unfortunately, is exactly what we do.I'm sure the CAF will create a new two star position to investigate possible solutions to retention, and get back to us all in 15-30 years.
Do those fall under DND/CAF specifically? Is RP Ops or CFHA under the purview of the co-located base commander? Specifically, can the military side of the chain even do anything about this?What I find interesting is that despite rising housing costs, nobody up the chain decided to look into building more/better barracks, apartments, and RHUs.
My understanding is infrastructure is under one organization, same with housing, which has been under funded.Do those fall under DND/CAF specifically? Is RP Ops or CFHA under the purview of the co-located base commander? Specifically, can the military side of the chain even do anything about this?
I'm serious - last time I was at a Wing, the WComd said he would love to build more accommodations, but it wasn't his call. Mind you, it was a while ago and I probably had a few drinks then, so I may have misheard.