GK .Dundas
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,828
- Points
- 960
Or Isreal not that long ago either.The UK is looking more and more like the Italy of the 60s, 70s and 80s.

Or Isreal not that long ago either.The UK is looking more and more like the Italy of the 60s, 70s and 80s.
The UK has stagnated before. What's lacking is a Thatcher.The UK is looking more and more like the Italy of the 60s, 70s and 80s.
Countries rarely decide to shoot itself in the foot, then blame every subsequent leader for not being able to keep up with its peers.The UK has stagnated before. What's lacking is a Thatcher.
Ever closer union is stuttering in a lot of countries.
So just like us? But let's spend 90 billion on a train when we can't afford to service the things we have already.I wonder why that is?
Right, because without the EU they are functionally broke. Too broke to afford to maintain services, too broke to raise taxes, but the public want their services and dont want higher taxes.
We are not as broke as the UK, so no.So just like us? But let's spend 90 billion on a train when we can't afford to service the things we have already.
Well yes,......Mr. Carney's already done his dirty work there.We are not as broke as the UK, so no.
Why are you allowed to get away with trolling?Well yes,......Mr. Carney's already done his dirty work there.![]()
You go find where I said walk away from USMCA/CUSMA. Please, I would love to see where I said that.So Altair's position is the UK screwed themselves by parting ways with the countries most accessible to them? Hmmm,..........irony anyone?
Why are you allowed to get away with trolling?
..and if one doesn't come quick enough?I've said diversify away from the USA and reduce our dependancy on them, and I've said sign a new deal whenever a mentally competent democrat is in office.
We have 10 years. Thats a lot of lead time even if the worse comes to pass...and if one doesn't come quick enough?
Oh the rumbling and mumbling is there for sure, but the Liberal caucus has never given itself the powers available under the Reform Act so they have no formal mechanism to do anything about it. Also, it's one thing to be disgruntled on the backbenches of a party with a majority government one year in and with a leader still apparently enjoying a honeymoon with the voters. Quite another to be on the backbenches of a majority government half way through it's mandate and with a leader whose approval rating was lower than Liz Truss's, who was herself arguably less popular that a lettuce....It is too soon to see of Carney will experience a back bench revolt but the murmurs are there. It must make some of Trudeau's leftovers stifle their so called principles to be part of Carneys government. I have had some great fun with my Hardcore Liberal friends and family members by teasing them that the Harper second term being implemented by Carney seems to have very broad support.
Would a Trudeau have bought 65,402 AR-derived Assault rifles?
Would Trudeau have reduced the Women's Issues department budget from 486 Million to under 80?
Trudeau would have kicked Submarine questions down the street through 2035 if he was still around.
Climate anyone?, and Pipelines for all.
Add in parliamentary secretaries and committee chairs and really, the odds of getting some post on top of just being an MP are pretty good in Canada.With our Cabinet sizes running about 25% larger than the average UK government cabinet (30-40 Canada vs 20-30 UK) and our need for about 175 MP's for a majority, you've about about a 20ish% chance in Canada for being a CM vs the 326 MP's at a minimum in the UK. This translates to be about a less than 10% chance of being a CM in the UK.
Thatcher took over shortly after the UK joined the EU and while the 70s and 80s were generally volatile that's when their whole banking system was restructured and became a huge part of the UK economy (and conversely manufacturing dropped off a lot, and Thatcher went hard over on miners and other blue collar types).The UK has stagnated before. What's lacking is a Thatcher.
Ever closer union is stuttering in a lot of countries.
The UK did not shoot itself in the foot, unless you accept only limited criteria for measuring benefit and cost.Countries rarely decide to shoot itself in the foot, then blame every subsequent leader for not being able to keep up with its peers.
I am trying to think of any prior instance I've come across of someone advancing the proposition that moving from resources to services is not entirely a good idea, and coming up short. Usually in Canada we lament our position as "hewers-of-wood-and-drawers-of-water" and dream about moving up.then decided to pull out of it out of shear stupidity, after (largely Thatcher) burning through most of their natural resources turning UK into a service economy for the EU.
Sure thing. But when it comes to governance, the population isnt giving UK PMs grace to deal with those economic costs.The UK did not shoot itself in the foot, unless you accept only limited criteria for measuring benefit and cost.
Exiting the EU has economic costs.
Exiting the EU has political (sovereignty) benefits.
Maitres chez nous has immense value. It turned out EU membership imposes risks of lowest-common-denominator and tragedy-of-commons problems.
