King Charles III

[Fishbone Jones]

Except that isnt what he's there for... both Canadian and EU officals have confirmed it.

The whole point of this exercise is to get the EU to really embrace the idea that Canada has what they want, and if they help us invest in the infrastructure, we can get the stuff over there.

You got a different read on it than me. However, that's our norm. Besides, he's been caught lying to our faces a number of times and simply can't be trusted to give a true narrative. YMMV, but I'm not changing my mind about him. He might be worth commenting on, but he's not worth arguing about.

 

[Furniture]

but only after 10 years of court cases. How do we get shovels in the ground expeditiously when half or more of the areas under consideration are under the control of local tribes people who are being funded from elsewhere to file grievances? We have ceded control over much of our resource rich territories and regardless of what Ottawa says our development is hamstrung by legalities.

So just throw our hands up and quit?

Why bother trying to get things done when we can just do nothing and whine about how nothing gets done...

 

[YZT580]

So just throw our hands up and quit?

Why bother trying to get things done when we can just do nothing and whine about how nothing gets done...

You have taken the wrong slant on my post. It isn't that we can't achieve anything it is a question of identifying and acting (not talking) the steps we can take to regain control over our resource development. The latest moves by Carney suggest that they are trying to simplify things but nothing has been said about regaining sovereignty or perhaps I should say establishing sovereignty over a relatively small group of people who are, in the end, still Canadian citizens. Getting rid of the Indian Act would be a great start.