- Reaction score
- 8,040
- Points
- 1,360
If that was the case your butter knife would be prohibited also, I think you will find that the issue is that is as no other practical purpose.
BadEnoughDude said:I still strongly suspect that it's a prohibited weapon due to the sheer amount of force it can exert. Anyone familiar with the Use of Force Spectrum knows that an ASP can technically be used as a lethal force option in certain circumstances. I was told by both a local police Use of Force instructor and an Inspector that the ASP can easily kill someone if it strikes certain areas and inflicts incredible amounts of damage and that they're really a LOT more dangerous than they look. I figured if civvies could easily obtain them, you'd see more civilians with them in some capacity and definitely more criminals using them.
BadEnoughDude said:Anyone familiar with the Use of Force Spectrum knows that an ASP can technically be used as a lethal force option in certain circumstances.
Bruce Monkhouse said:...and
I am very familiar with that spectrum and that is 100% false, it is a "less than lethal" option only.
Which "anyone" should know does NOT mean that it won't kill................
Kat Stevens said:So can a 2x4, a ball peen hammer, and a sledge hammer handle. Guess I better put Peavey Mart on warning as a supplier of deadly weapons. I have a slingshot and a pile of lead shrapnel balls, I could very likely kill you with it if I hit you in the right spot too.
BadEnoughDude said:I was given the example of it being a lethal force option in a situation such as the suspect is on top of someone on the ground and is going to stab them (or something similarly potentially lethal) and the officer cannot use his sidearm or deploy a Taser because it may hit the victim, and as such, has to bean the suspect on the head with an ASP.
I'm dead serious in this example given. I think it'd make a lot more sense just to nail the suspect in the body, but that was the example given. I recall it being a during a Criminology class where I had managed to bring in some guest speakers from the local police service and someone asked a bunch of questions about use of force (naturally in a way implying that all force is excessive force....).
Slim said:For anyone who is PROPERLY trained in the use of the ASP or MANADNOCK Telescopic baton series of weapons, the body is broken up into three different colour groups;
-Green: these are areas that are "safe to strike" in that they are non-lethal areas if hit with the weapon. These include arms and legs, excluding the joints and ankles/feet/head/neck areas.
Orange: these are areas of possible permanent injury. They include all joints in the body, such as knees and elbows.
Red areas: these are potentially lethal areas if struck and include the face, head, neck etc.
Slim
]Bruce Monkhouse said:I don't see how the thigh in any way stops a weapon delivery system, very puzzling to me.
Pusser said:]
Having done some ASP baton training, I would think that if someone were to whack you on the thigh, it's going to make you stop and think - or at least spill your coffee.
ballz said:I'm not a medical professional... but I am a kickboxer.
I have seen (and executed) a good kick (with the shin) just above the knee drop a few people, and even stop opponents altogether (TKO via leg kicks is not that uncommon). I have also been kicked in the same manner a few times and was unable to walk properly for two days. In muay thai, the thigh is a major target for a reason. It feels like Barry Bonds used a baseball bat to give you a charlie horse from your worst nightmares.
That said, I googled that femoral artery, and its (they?) pretty deep inside your thigh next to your femur. I can't see a leg kick doing much to affect it. Also, if it were possible to render someone unconscious with a leg kick, I'd be Buakaw Por Pramuk would have done it already.
Container said:6 cops repeatedly hitting him with batons, and other things, did nothing we just kept at him until we had him on his back and the 6 of us, and two emts, were on top of him. Eventually he kinda gave up for a minute and cuffed him to the stretcher, and then put restraints on the elbows, ankles and knees to immobilize him.
Ive never seen it done prone. Im surprised it was ever done given what we know about positional asphyxiation.mariomike said:I see you transported him on his back. That's how they do it now. We are no longer permited to transport patients in a prone position with their hands tied behind their back, as per the Coroner's Office.
Container said:Ive never seen it done prone. Im surprised it was ever done given what we know about positional asphyxiation.