- Reaction score
- 4,596
- Points
- 1,260
A lot of society summed up in one sentence right thereSure they eat the occasional tide pod but adults are dying by falling off cliffs and buildings trying to take pictures.
A lot of society summed up in one sentence right thereSure they eat the occasional tide pod but adults are dying by falling off cliffs and buildings trying to take pictures.
If we are going to go back to that how about we add property ownership as part of that.Just go back to 21 yrs. old being the legal adult age (the way it was before the baby boomers demanded it be lowered to 18).
Instead of how "mature" a voter or someone running for office is, how about "how much do you know about what the level of government you want to work in?" Quick civics test for voters & candidates as a way in to the ballot booth or the office?... Just drop age, add a test ...
If we had multiple levels of government being elected on the same day, it would be cool to have a bunch of names with no party affiliation, and a blank spot for federal, provincial and municipal candidates that the voter needed to put these names into.Instead of how "mature" a voter or someone running for office is, how about "how much do you know about what the level of government you want to work in?" Quick civics test for voters & candidates as a way in to the ballot booth or the office?
Would you rather have a 17-year-old who knows realistically what can be done voting/running for office over, say, a 50-year-old who can't even tell you correctly what the level of government they're voting/running for does?
Discuss ....
Got that aaaaaaaaaaaaaall the time when I used to report on city hall as a reporter - sadly, sometimes council didn't realize that they couldn't move the levers of some bits of power, only express non-binding opinions via resolutions.It does remind me of how many times people tell me the Prime Minister is responsible for fixing their streets’ potholes, or thinking that the local council has anything to do with forestry or wildlife management…
That's some not very comforting data right there.Young people may not be the bulwarks of democracy. According to research, they may have given up on it and are open to authoritarianism.
Are Americans losing faith in democracy?
Vox is a general interest news site for the 21st century. Its mission: to help everyone understand our complicated world, so that we can all help shape it. In text, video and audio, our reporters explain politics, policy, world affairs, technology, culture, science, the climate crisis, money...www.vox.com
Less to do this and more to do with democracy being ineffective at times.Not too surprising. My nieces and nephews tend to reflect those views. Not too enamored with democracy (most don't bother to vote) and seem more open to more authoritarian type governance (leaders or parties who would get things done more directly instead of wasting so much time with argument and disagreement). May be due to declining educational standards and/or too much reliance on social media for info.
On a serious note, Couldn't this concept be what Justin was alluding to when he said that he admired the Chinese dictatorship?Not too surprising. My nieces and nephews tend to reflect those views. Not too enamored with democracy (most don't bother to vote) and seem more open to more authoritarian type governance (leaders or parties who would get things done more directly instead of wasting so much time with argument and disagreement). May be due to declining educational standards and/or too much reliance on social media for info.
Harsh, but ... culling, indeedIf we had multiple levels of government being elected on the same day, it would be cool to have a bunch of names with no party affiliation, and a blank spot for federal, provincial and municipal candidates that the voter needed to put these names into.
Those that got the correct person for the right level of government has their vote counted.
Prime Minister Justin Trudeau shares his late father's disdain for the constitutional "notwithstanding clause" and he's not ruling out asking the Supreme Court to weigh in on Quebec's pre-emptive use of it to trample the rights of religious minorities.
In a year-end interview with the Ottawa bureau of The Canadian Press, Trudeau said the the Charter of Rights and Freedoms is supposed to be "a bulwark against popular measures that attack the rights of … minorities."
But the charter's notwithstanding clause allows a government to say, "regardless of the fact that we are attacking your fundamental rights or limiting your fundamental rights, and the charter says that's wrong, we're still going to go ahead and do it."
"It's basically a loophole that allows a majority to override fundamental rights of a minority. And that's why I agree with my father that it's not a great thing to have in a Charter of Rights and Freedoms." ...
Some of the latest on the "what to do about Quebec" thing ...