• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2021 - ????

We’ll see. He’s a malignant narcissist who desperately wants to take on Poilievre and believes he’s divinely chosen to do so. Also working in his favour is there is no time for a leadership race and only a sadomasochist would be interested in the job at this point.

If Trudeau wants to fulfill his saviour complex, they should let him. Then the party can rebuild after the election.

Being a drama teacher, he does seem to like a little drama... ;)

1732287653641.png
 
It's not JUST one political side on the U.S. anymore twisting arms ....
View attachment 89306
Except the Dems have been on our case since at least the Obama Administration. His “The world needs more Canada” speech wasn’t about convening, though it was probably too subtle for Johnny Canuck.

What little movement we have seen in recent years is thanks to pressure from the Biden Administration. I could see Trudeau being so bloody-minded to ignore the pressure from the Trump Administration out of spite.
 
This government is in the "too little, too late" stage of the game. Short of something absolutely revolutionary that dramatically improves the average voter's day to day life, there will be a significant change next fall.
Well, a change of government, but expecting more of the same, just with different branding and messaging.
 
Well, a change of government, but expecting more of the same, just with different branding and messaging.
I'm not quite that pessimistic, but I also don't expect loadsa change really quick, considering how tangled the ball of string is to unravel - and, to be honest, how much any one leader can do no matter how hard they push solutions. We'll see ...
 
I'm not quite that pessimistic, but I also don't expect loadsa change really quick, considering how tangled the ball of string is to unravel - and, to be honest, how much any one leader can do no matter how hard they push solutions. We'll see ...
A lot can be done if the will is there. There has just been no will. Now with the scary orange man huffing and puffing. Whats worse an extra 10B in US tanks etc or a 25% tariff?
 
We'll see, Team Orange - we'll see ....
Seems like he finally read the fine print:
Screenshot 2024-11-26 200103.jpg
Screenshot 2024-11-26 200121.jpg
While Team Orange is way behind in fundraising, one NDP-ite commentator I heard this week says the NDP is used to doing elections not when they're fully ready, but when they happen. If that's the case, makes it hard to counter the "timing out the old pension clock" narrative when it comes to explaining Team Orange still backing Team Red.
 
We'll see, Team Orange - we'll see ....
Seems like he finally read the fine print:
View attachment 89381
View attachment 89382
While Team Orange is way behind in fundraising, one NDP-ite commentator I heard this week says the NDP is used to doing elections not when they're fully ready, but when they happen. If that's the case, makes it hard to counter the "timing out the old pension clock" narrative when it comes to explaining Team Orange still backing Team Red.
so if Trudeau changes things we, the tax payer are on the hook for (and I am guessing) another10 billion in debt instead of the 6 that Trudeau's plan would have cost plus another 9 months of his government. We lose
 
The fact that the rebate excludes the lowest and and highest voting cohorts should be telling. The lowest socioeconomic groups also have the lowest voter turnout, while the +65 group heavily favour the conservatives.
 
Again, not giving the 250$ to the wealthiest segments of our population, and the segment that only syphons from the systems was a solid play.

Its often that middle part, which is supporting the bulk of our myriad of social programs, that gets left out.

I thank the LPC for my 250$, 125$ will go to the CCFR and the other to the CPC.
 
I'm not quite that pessimistic, but I also don't expect loadsa change really quick, considering how tangled the ball of string is to unravel - and, to be honest, how much any one leader can do no matter how hard they push solutions. We'll see ...
I think the core in the PCs is still the same as when Harper was there, and while we got some shiny new stuff for Afgh, the in service side took big cuts to offset it.

I expect our current $1B in annual in service cuts to stay in place, and some of the long term promised programs to come 'under review'. I'm not even thinking about meetin 2% funding, just enough money to do the job we are currently supposed to do, and replacement kit for the worn out obsolete equipment to maintain capabilities would be amazing.

Needing director approval to buy consumables at the National level to meet forecasted demand (vice waiting for an HPR when the shelves were empty) was pretty demoralizing. Pretty sure they paid more in SWE for that approval loop than it was worth, and then we still had push it through the procurement system. That was pretty demoralizing, and was glad to get posted (but still feel guilty about leaving the team behind).
 
All the 250$ is a bribe paid for by our grandchildren. Wasteful today, for them to be forced to pay it off later. That 250$ won't mean much for any of us, but how many times will we as a country have to repay that amount in interest?
 
Back
Top