• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

I wasn't aware that the like to view ratio was the main point of a view, as opposed to the message of the actual video itself.

Good to know.
Her content is got some potential "maybes" to it (lets see if we open up arctic relations with others like Norway).

Its just that right now, its ideas and maybes
 
Before anyone rolls their eyes at Alberta et el banning these books for being a dog whistle attack on LGBT (which in some cases I believe is what they're doing) it's worthwhile to read about these books.
Specifically the images and controversial content.

Like I said the examples I saw showed graphic (pictures) of various sexual acts. It's was a YouTube video of a Danielle Smith press conference where she provided examples of their aim.

I'm in support of literature on the study of the gender spectrum and the study of greater topic that is human sexuality in our school libraries. I'm not in favor pornographic depictions of sexual acts.
 
It would be interesting to see which part of Trump's total overall actions the CPC is supportive of and is not supportive of.
Just a thought. That might change from region to region (Alberta conservatives vs Ontario Conservatives vs Maritime conservatives, etc.) Each region has different economical interest.
 
Her content is got some potential "maybes" to it (lets see if we open up arctic relations with others like Norway).

Its just that right now, its ideas and maybes
A lot of what is happening now is preparing the ground.

It does take a lot to reorientate an economy, or in the case of Europe, multiple different economies. The seeds planted now wont be reaped for years, but I do think she does a decent job of highlighting the work being done now that can facilitate the growth that comes later.

Sure, it's not as sexy as the now now now as a certain "90 deals in 90 days" type of leader attempts to do, which leads to hollow deals that fall apart the second any real scrutiny is applied to them, but for long term transformative change which isn't done in a day, but doesn't mean the work isn't being done.

I also do like that it's from a European, someone who doesn't really give a damn about our internal politics, just sees the fact as they are and comments on them, as opposed to domestic commentators who apply heavy spin to their stories for the domestic audience.
 
Green - NDP merger ? I never understood why they both exist. To me they are really one in the same.

The big difference being that the Greens’ sole purpose is to make Liz a senator. Since she became leader, it was always about her and her carrying water for the Liberals.
 
Absolutely not. The youth and the elderly need more controls when it comes to driving. I would up the driving age to 21 to be honest. As well our come from aways need more extensive training and probably a longer probationary/accompanied period.
I take the opposite approach. If being a adult starts at 18 everything a adult is legally allowed to do should be available at 18. Be it drinking, driving, voting, joining the military, etc. this constant babying of adults needs to stop.
Like I said the examples I saw showed graphic (pictures) of various sexual acts. It's was a YouTube video of a Danielle Smith press conference where she provided examples of their aim.

I'm in support of literature on the study of the gender spectrum and the study of greater topic that is human sexuality in our school libraries. I'm not in favor pornographic depictions of sexual acts.
Keep in mind we get all upset over sex being described but don’t blink a eye over reading books describing murder, war, etc. which is all a whole lot more unnatural than sex.
 
I take the opposite approach. If being a adult starts at 18 everything a adult is legally allowed to do should be available at 18. Be it drinking, driving, voting, joining the military, etc. this constant babying of adults needs to stop.

Keep in mind we get all upset over sex being described but don’t blink a eye over reading books describing murder, war, etc. which is all a whole lot more unnatural than sex.

Look I am all for parental freedoms. They are welcome the but the material and use it at home.

I don't think it's appropriate on schools. What I saw wasn't educational it was graphic novels with explicit sex scenes. I don't think that's correct for schools.
 
the whole thing is a gross overreach.
Maybe. Have your read or read about whats contained in books like Flamer or Fun home?

For example in the former there's apparently a scene where young boys are playing a game where they take turns jerking off in a bottle. In the later the father has implied sexual relationships with underaged boys.

In another graphic novel I searched up forn reference there was an illustration of two young teenage girls with one of them on their knees sucking on a strap on dick the other one was wearing.

And you cant forget the Holy Bible, Genesis 19:30–38, of course.

Quite possible I'm just being prudish.

Being available in the library is not the same thing as being curriculum required reading.
That's a very good point, inclined to agree with you. I'm not a fan of banning books from libraries and censoring knowledge.

There's always a line to be crossed though. Knowledge vs normalizing.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top