• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

They targeted my Liberal MP in a by- election, which he won in a walk.
They've targeted a number of ridings since 2021 according to Wikipedia ....
  • 2021 Canadian federal election, Saint Boniface—Saint Vital: 21 candidate names on the ballot
  • 2022 Mississauga—Lakeshore federal by-election: 40 candidate names on the ballot
  • 2023 Winnipeg South Centre federal by-election: 48 candidate names on the ballot
  • 2023 Kitchener Centre provincial by-election, 18 candidate names on the ballot
  • 2024 Toronto—St. Paul's federal by-election: 84 candidate names on the ballot
  • 2024 LaSalle—Émard—Verdun federal by-election: 91 candidate names on the ballot
  • 2025 Canadian federal election, Carleton: 91 candidate names on the ballot
No outcry that I heard/saw/read about those other ones, though .....
 
A good run down by the BBC. Seems he can be a bit of a bully if he wants to...


Who is Mark Carney, Canada's new PM?​




You don't get to his level without some alpha dog in you.

And why I expect he has a best before date as a politician. Because you also don't get to that level with out breaking some eggs and making some enemies.
 
Last edited:
Interesting party breakdown in the “trusting the results” section …
View attachment 93128
Thr Conservative Party seems to be completely compromised with MAGA and Russian info ops. We have one of the most secure election systems on Earth and there is no evidence of fraud but yet, here we are with them being spoonfed to believe there was some sort of fraud, very MAGA indeed.
 
As Jen Gerson said, she’s being a coward for not coming right out and saying where she stands. She’s winking and nodding to the seppies while saying she wants “sovereignty association”. She’s managed to talk out of both sides of her mouth and was as subtle about it as a 2x4 between the eyes.

You know what Danielle? Just come right out and declare you’re a seppie. You’re not fooling anyone with your “I’m just asking questions” routine.
At what point does this because actual treason? Like actually, I'm curious on the legality of such.
 
No. It doesn’t seem to be.

No? First PP's original riding... sure chalk that up to random... now immediately next going into his second riding? That is just a random event again?

No. Now the appearance is targeted.
 
No? First PP's original riding... sure chalk that up to random... now immediately next going into his second riding? That is just a random event again?

No. Now the appearance is targeted.
It's trolling. There is blood in the water with Poilievre and they're trying to make a point. They've been around for a while and have targeted Liberals and Conservatives alike.

Personally I agree with them that we need electoral reform bad but I think it's a dumb method. That said, it's a legal protest and if they're following electoral rule, it's their right to do so.
 
At what point does this because actual treason? Like actually, I'm curious on the legality of such.
I'll leave it to others to parse in detail, but here's the broad strokes from the Criminal Code ....
  • 46 (1) Every one commits high treason who, in Canada,
    • (a) kills or attempts to kill Her Majesty, or does her any bodily harm tending to death or destruction, maims or wounds her, or imprisons or restrains her;
    • (b) levies war against Canada or does any act preparatory thereto; or
    • (c) assists an enemy at war with Canada, or any armed forces against whom Canadian Forces are engaged in hostilities, whether or not a state of war exists between Canada and the country whose forces they are.
  • (2) Every one commits treason who, in Canada,
    • (a) uses force or violence for the purpose of overthrowing the government of Canada or a province;
    • (b) without lawful authority, communicates or makes available to an agent of a state other than Canada, military or scientific information or any sketch, plan, model, article, note or document of a military or scientific character that he knows or ought to know may be used by that state for a purpose prejudicial to the safety or defence of Canada;
    • (c) conspires with any person to commit high treason or to do anything mentioned in paragraph (a);
    • (d) forms an intention to do anything that is high treason or that is mentioned in paragraph (a) and manifests that intention by an overt act; or
    • (e) conspires with any person to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) or forms an intention to do anything mentioned in paragraph (b) and manifests that intention by an overt act.
 
At what point does this because actual treason? Like actually, I'm curious on the legality of such.

Probably since it doesn't meet the threshold for treason outlined in the CCC and the SCC basically made it legal for a province to pursue secession.

How about this country does better as a whole instead of push provinces to the brink? Let's start there.
 
Thr Conservative Party seems to be completely compromised with MAGA and Russian info ops. We have one of the most secure election systems on Earth and there is no evidence of fraud but yet, here we are with them being spoonfed to believe there was some sort of fraud, very MAGA indeed.
This will be one of the mountains PP needs to climb if he wants to un-unite the left against him. Needs to find away to lead his base, not just harness them.
 
Ignore the Canada Proud things just where I found the video.


Perfect speech. I don't care about any hardships as long as the final direction is sound. Being willing to live with uncomfortable for a while to make long term improvements is pretty much a given in just about anything in life.

The rest of canada can continue to be a frog in slowly boiling water.
 
This will be one of the mountains PP needs to climb if he wants to un-unite the left against him. Needs to find away to lead his base, not just harness them.
Allowing the Religious ultra-Right to dictate policy has been a disaster for Conservatives continent-wide and I say that as a practicing Catholic. These evangelical pressure groups have been the Trojan Horse for all sorts of hijinks at the provincial and federal level. Unless the PCs and High Tories unite, they're never take their parties back from the likes of Jenni Bryne and Preston Manning.
 
Perfect speech. I don't care about any hardships as long as the final direction is sound. Being willing to live with uncomfortable for a while to make long term improvements is pretty much a given in just about anything in life.

The rest of canada can continue to be a frog in slowly boiling water.
What do you define as "long-term improvements"
 
Allowing the Religious ultra-Right to dictate policy has been a disaster for Conservatives continent-wide and I say that as a practicing Catholic. These evangelical pressure groups have been the Trojan Horse for all sorts of hijinks at the provincial and federal level. Unless the PCs and High Tories unite, they're never take their parties back from the likes of Jenni Bryne and Preston Manning.

What proposed policy of the CPCs is/was Religious and Ultra-Right based ?
 
No? First PP's original riding... sure chalk that up to random... now immediately next going into his second riding? That is just a random event again?

No. Now the appearance is targeted.
No.

Read up above a few threads of the history of these guys. They have pretty much been doing this in every by election since 2021 (ie before PP was leader).

They targeted Freeland and PP last election because they were high profile candidates.

This next by election is the only by election coming up and it’s a high profile candidate.

It’s attention seeking and trolling. Of course it’s targeted but not the way you think it is.
 
Perfect speech.
Threatening to isolate yourself as a landlocked sovereign nation in response to not being granted access to tidewater? Brilliant.
Threatening to turn your domestic customer base into a foreign customer base if they don't shape the market exactly as you demand? Brilliant
Complaining about Federal overreach while demanding Federal overreach? Brilliant.
 
It's trolling. There is blood in the water with Poilievre and they're trying to make a point. They've been around for a while and have targeted Liberals and Conservatives alike.

Personally I agree with them that we need electoral reform bad but I think it's a dumb method. That said, it's a legal protest and if they're following electoral rule, it's their right to do so.
This.

It’s a weird way of protesting.
 
Back
Top