• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

I hate to defend Carny but I feel like much of his cabinet has been pampered and coddled and never really expected to deliver much.

Liberals went from a soy boy PM to one with actual business experience and thousands of meetings under his belt.

will ferrell popcorn GIF
 
Typical municipal infrastructure isn't nation-building.
True in a broad sense, but pumping $ into infrastructure to lift all boats has off and on been suggested by both sides of the political spectrum.
Almost all communities in or adjacent to existing municipalities and metro areas already do pretty well for infrastructure.
Those aren't the First Nations with the long-standing boil water advisories, though.
What does that leave for the sum of the population with the kinds of requirements listed, I wonder?
If we believe PBO, they said in 2021 that "the total funding needed to meet current and future (sewer & water) needs on reserve from the period of 2016-2017 to 2025-2026 to be approximately $7.4 billion," or about $740M a year in 2021 bucks ($1.1B a year in this-year bucks according to the BoC inflation calculator).
We don't have enough funds to avoid triaging projects for maximum benefit.
True enough, but when one of the mega-projects might be the Ring of Fire, well, it only takes one community with aggressive legal counsel to gum up those works. And the grumbling is already pretty organized as of this week ....
Some of the commentariat are saying that getting it done right with everyone on side early could be easier and cheaper than ploughing ahead and dealing with litigation later.

Also, with all the mentions of PMJT's seeming ignorance of all those advisories on reserves around here when criticizing the previous Red captain, I thought that would be a priority for at least some, right? ;)
 
True that.
Certainly not the rhetoric most of us expected from the LPC. The indigenous leadership keeps citing Idle No More but they're making the mistake of assuming the political climate is the same, which it isn't. They'll find far less allies this time around if they're blockading roads over railroads and transmission lines while we're being threatened.
 
Good catch - also archived here if the original link doesn't work.

In a way, it's "old news" in that a lot of former Ministers have said duty to consult =/= a FN veto - so have a couple of SCOC decisions (here & here). Maybe true on paper, but in practice, it can - all depends on how the question is asked re: "has there been ENOUGH accommodation offered?". The latest context makes the Minister saying it out loud sound spicier than usual.

It'll also be interesting to see how the first Indigenous Minister of Indigenous Services handles any questions on this one. If she hasn't already, she'll soon learn why other Indigenous folks before her have been reluctant to take the post.

Will Team Red 2.0 be willing to take some national heat on some projects (contrary to Team Red 1.0 brand, but if he really wants to be different than PMJT, this is one big way), or are they planning to pave the way to ... persuade FNs who may object? We'll see ... 🍿
 
The border security bill has some massive implications. There will be a lot less refugee claimants eligible to be heard by the board with the new measures if passed.
1. Claims would be ineligible under 101(1) of IRPA if they attempt to claim asylum over a year after entering Canada after June 24, 2020.

2. Claims would be ineligible under 101(1) of IRPA if they enter Canada irregularly (ie border jumpers) and make a claim after 14 days of entrance.

Interestingly enough, they're already ineligible if they apply before 14 days under the STCA (A101(1)(e)) so this bill will essentially make it impossible for border jumpers to claim asylum. I wonder if there will be a carve out that will allow them to apply at POEs. Probably not.
 
Last edited:
The border security bill has some massive implications. There will be a lot less refugee claimants eligible to be heard by the board with the new measures if passed.
1. Claims would be ineligible under 101(1) of IRPA if they attempt to claim asylum over a year after entering Canada after June 24, 2020.

2. Claims would be ineligible under 101(1) of IRPA if they enter Canada irregularly (ie border jumpers) and make a claim after 14 days of entrance.

Interestingly enough, they're already ineligible if they apply before 14 days under the STCA so this bill will essentially make it impossible for border jumpers to claim asylum. I wonder if there will be a carve out that will allow them to apply at POEs. Probably not.
I’ve only read the summary so far, and there’s probably a half dozen or more points that caught my eye on first pass. I’ll try to read the bill tonight if I have the chance. There may be some initially modest looking things in there that have a real impact.
 
That's what I meant re: DTC doesn't give a veto, at least by that name, anyway.

Key words from the legislation are these (all highlights mine)
View attachment 93656
... while The Supremes say this:
View attachment 93657
One law firm with a history of representing particularly activist FNs says this:

All that legalese aside, it still comes back to as little as one FN with enough resources to litigate to the hilt.
with a little financial help from the normal suspects
 
with a little financial help from the normal suspects
Financial help, persuasion, poh-TAY-toe, poh-TAH-toe ....
I have lived with a well for 60 years so yes, I have no problem with people taking the initiative and providing for their own health
And since people living on reserve are, in a real (and oversimplified sense), tenants of Canada (since they can't own their own lots), you don't think the landlord would be liable if some folks got sick from bad well water? And since the government already pays for collective water treatment, who's going to be asked to pay? Not as simple as places where a homeowner owns the house and the land it's on.
 

have to say this is more detailed then I thought it would be for Carney's first major piece of legislation
 

have to say this is more detailed then I thought it would be for Carney's first major piece of legislation
It's an ambitious Bill, but achievable. I would've liked to see an expansion of CBSA's authorities to cover between ports of entry and the implementation of full-time peace officer powers. It's also the first concrete mention of how he plans to grow the CBSA. What's missing is rhe timeline for the growth of both the RCMP and CBSA.

Another interesting piece was the expanded roles for the CCG. Fisheries already has an armed presence on the oceans with the fish cops. Does Carney now envision eventually arming the CCG?
 
Liberals downplay narrowly lost vote demanding spring budget


The Liberals downplayed a vote on the throne speech they narrowly lost Monday evening to all the opposition parties which urges the government to present an economic update or a budget before the House of Commons rises for the summer on June 20.

The Liberals really don't want Canadians to see the numbers.



Mark Gerretsen, the chief government whip who is responsible for ensuring that Liberal MPs attend and vote in the way the party desires, insisted nothing went wrong.

This is what i hate about our system. Your MP is supposed to represent you but they're party slaves.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top