• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

Hearing that PP may have screwed up procedurally and given up his right as leader of the opposition to propose amendments to the budget ceding it to the Bloc now…

The tea must flow.

Leonardo Dicaprio Leo GIF
 
expected to be introduced later this morning after party leader Pierre Poilievreinexplicably failed to introduce an amendment at the close of his response to the budget yesterday afternoon.

“Traditionally the official Opposition leader has proposed the main budget amendment,” the Star notes.

“The Bloc Québécois seized on the unexpected opening to swiftly present notice of their own motion to amend the budget — which now becomes the main proposed change to the document — as Conservatives scrambled to fix the oversight.
 
expected to be introduced later this morning after party leader Pierre Poilievreinexplicably failed to introduce an amendment at the close of his response to the budget yesterday afternoon.

“Traditionally the official Opposition leader has proposed the main budget amendment,” the Star notes.

“The Bloc Québécois seized on the unexpected opening to swiftly present notice of their own motion to amend the budget — which now becomes the main proposed change to the document — as Conservatives scrambled to fix the oversight.
Whoops.
 
I've never been able to understand how exactly someone assesses public service productivity.

Hours worked is easy, but there is no kind of equivalent of 'hours worked per widget produced', and things like getting contingencies in place for emergency preparedness, or all the extra work required to maintain obsolete stuff is inherently inefficient, but nothing to do with the workforce.

Travel approval is the obvious example; need to get trip approval at the DG/ADM level for the concept of the trip, then get the travel itinerary approved, and finally get actual travel approval in claimsX, which adds delays and frequently increases booking cost for flight tickets, and LOE around that costs more than the travel, but at the worker level means that something that used to take 15 minutes now can take days due to process increases. At the KPI level though, would be stupid to compare the LOE it takes now to LOE it used to take for a measure of productivity.

YMMV with WFH, but I think the problem children weren't doing shit working from the office either, so general management issue, and PS doesn't seem noticeably worse compared to large private firms that I worked in years ago. If you really want productivity giving management tools, training and mentoring to actually manage people, as well as sufficient resources to do things properly. We're way understaffed, so sure we're doing some stuff pretty inefficiently just because we don't have enough bandwidth to actually track and manage the workload effectively when you are just scrambling to whatever has the nearest deadline

Personally find it more productive to do a lot of WFH, and also easily take micro breaks (like this) before tackling things like detailed reviews that are extremely difficult to do in a open concept office and takes 2-3 times as long. Some things are better in person, so hybrid works well for a lot of office settings, but that's where giving managers discretion makes sense. If you want to issue top down directives either way that don't make sense at the team level can't really complain about productivity impacts to the individual workers
 
You'll be excited to hear Japan has increasingly relaxed certain immigration and foreign worker rules in recent years. They are, as a matter of fact, not falling off any cliffs.

They're just being very selective still, probably to avoid looking like Europe.

Here's some examples I found.

-expanded visa pathways for foreign workers in labour short sectors
-SSW program to cover more industries
-allowed some SSW workers to bring families (previously restricted)
-created paths for SSW workers to obtain indefinite residency
-increased the number of foreign residents to 3.4M
-relaxed eligibility for working holiday visas
-increased intake of students and technical trainees
-encouraged companies to recruit foreign workers more actively
-simplified renewal and application procedures for some visas
-offering support services to retain
immigrants (language and integration programs)
Even if legislatively allowed, I suspect cultural acceptance will lag behind. Either that or it will be like some Middle Eastern countries where immigration is essentially cheap labour.

I've never been able to understand how exactly someone assesses public service productivity.

Hours worked is easy, but there is no kind of equivalent of 'hours worked per widget produced', and things like getting contingencies in place for emergency preparedness, or all the extra work required to maintain obsolete stuff is inherently inefficient, but nothing to do with the workforce.

Travel approval is the obvious example; need to get trip approval at the DG/ADM level for the concept of the trip, then get the travel itinerary approved, and finally get actual travel approval in claimsX, which adds delays and frequently increases booking cost for flight tickets, and LOE around that costs more than the travel, but at the worker level means that something that used to take 15 minutes now can take days due to process increases. At the KPI level though, would be stupid to compare the LOE it takes now to LOE it used to take for a measure of productivity.

YMMV with WFH, but I think the problem children weren't doing shit working from the office either, so general management issue, and PS doesn't seem noticeably worse compared to large private firms that I worked in years ago. If you really want productivity giving management tools, training and mentoring to actually manage people, as well as sufficient resources to do things properly. We're way understaffed, so sure we're doing some stuff pretty inefficiently just because we don't have enough bandwidth to actually track and manage the workload effectively when you are just scrambling to whatever has the nearest deadline

Personally find it more productive to do a lot of WFH, and also easily take micro breaks (like this) before tackling things like detailed reviews that are extremely difficult to do in a open concept office and takes 2-3 times as long. Some things are better in person, so hybrid works well for a lot of office settings, but that's where giving managers discretion makes sense. If you want to issue top down directives either way that don't make sense at the team level can't really complain about productivity impacts to the individual workers
The multiple levels of travel approval in your example is the type of thing that outsiders site as inefficient bureaucracy. Even at the provincial level, I travelled to the UK and US. The boss said 'go' so that's local approval. I had to get DM approval because it was out of country. After that, it was the normal approval of expenses when I got back.
 
Back
Top