- Reaction score
- 10,935
- Points
- 1,160
Yeah. I see why it's rage bait. Maybe our kids will see a better justice system in their time.So yeah it’s a very unsatisfying sentence but I can see how it happened.

Yeah. I see why it's rage bait. Maybe our kids will see a better justice system in their time.So yeah it’s a very unsatisfying sentence but I can see how it happened.
convenient but true. I would agree that the liberals chose to insert enough in the budget to allow the NDP to back it. Regardless of what either the cons. or the Bloc proposed they would never accept it therefore the purpose of both of those motions becomes theatrics. The opposition wanted the public to be aware of what they would have done if they had had the opportunity. If either motion had passed, the government would have gone down to defeat so it wasn't going to happen, therefore theatrics. That is all from me, there are more important issues to deal with. Have a good weekend (not sarcasm)Nah. It literally has one of the NDP platform promises/ideas in the Youth Climate Corps
Yes but the question about theatre misunderstands timeline, because the theatrical demand was made public BEFORE the budget was presented
The exact thing I'm talking about doesnt count. Lol convenient.
Public Services and Procurement Canada is seeking to recoup another $400,000, but offered no updates on retrieving money from ArriveCan contractor GC Strategies.
Then he should be facing 10 to 14 years, not six months less a day.Would be nice if they explained why he has been judged to have little to no chance of rehabilitation.
CAD is at 71 cents.
the USD has been dropping like crazy. Seems like it's not seen as a stable reserve currency to some, which is keeping the CAD relatively stable.
March 2025. 70 cents.71 cents?? Well lordy, lordy, all is well....![]()
I can see the conviction. Dangerous driving is generally defined as a 'marked departure' from normal driving, vs inadvertent or inattention under Careless Driving. I can only assume the sentence is within the Court's sentencing guidelines and, yes, the clock would have been ticking. The defence argument that the real culprit is the driver of the truck who actually collided with the victim is the defence doing what the defence does.I can’t find an actual published sentencing decision, best I could find was a news story from the time:
From the facts laid out in there I’m actually surprised crown kept pushing a criminal charge at all versus a provincial careless driving charge. Criminal dangerous operation’s a pretty high threshold, and he would be able to argue that the car behind him was able to safely stop, and that the other driver who ate the fail to stop charge was much a part of the problem and only got a provincial ticket… So it was a chancy prosecution. In terms of the specific sentence, it would have been mitigated by his plea, and by shared responsibility for the crash. I suspect crown probably agreed to a good deal to secure the very uncertain criminal conviction. Crown may also have been skittish about going to court with how very delayed that prosecution was- 2018 to mid 2023. Defence could probably have made an potentially won a Jordan stay.
So yeah it’s a very unsatisfying sentence but I can see how it happened.
Political activist posts tweet with political bias... With a link to a left bias media outlet.
That is fair observation.Political activist posts tweet with political bias... With a link to a left bias media outlet.
Political activist posts tweet with political bias... With a link to a left bias media outlet.
He’ll survive that just fine. It’s in Calgary, in Feb and delegates can only vote in person. The conditions are set for him.He is going to have a leadership review soon.
Honestly it's a more important than where the (least) most transparent Canadian government ever is spending $581,000,000,000.00I think some people get really excited when they see weakness in the PPs leadership.
73 cents to USD in 2004.
71 cents to USD in 2016.
71 cents to USD in 2025.
Define better. The sweet spot for CAD has always been 70-75 cents on the USD. The trouble with a higher conversion rate is that our goods become more expensive for customers, which means they buy less. That is not good for a large economy with a small domestic market. We are ultimately a global trading country, and rely on that trade. 70-75 remains one of our competitive advantages.88 cents to USD in 2006
88 cents to USD in 2009
1.00 to USD in 2012
91 cents to USD in 2014
Our dollar seems to do better under different governments.
Honestly it's a more important than where the (least) most transparent Canadian government ever is spending $581,000,000,000.00
I guess that's better for trade competitiveness. I figured the dollar being 80-90 on the USD would mean export demand might decrease slightly but domestic consumers get cheaper imports. We end up marginally less competitive ininternationally but with better domestic buying power.Define better. The sweet spot for CAD has always been 70-75 cents on the USD. The trouble with a higher conversion rate is that our goods become more expensive for customers, which means they buy less. That is not good for a large economy with a small domestic market. We are ultimately a global trading country, and rely on that trade. 70-75 remains one of our competitive advantages.
Ah, Halifax Tar...Hey comrade, you know the narrative. This is a new Gov.
An automatic deduction of social credit is now taking place.
![]()
As long as we don't need to buy the widgets to make the gadgets ......Define better. The sweet spot for CAD has always been 70-75 cents on the USD. The trouble with a higher conversion rate is that our goods become more expensive for customers, which means they buy less. That is not good for a large economy with a small domestic market. We are ultimately a global trading country, and rely on that trade. 70-75 remains one of our competitive advantages.