• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Liberal Minority Government 2025 - ???

Big news out of Windsor with Stellantis (Chrysler) selling out of its joint venture with LG Electronics (South Korean firm) to build EV batteries for the auto industry. No word if they sold their 49% stake at a loss or not. Stellantis's stock is down over 27% in trading on the Milan Stock Exchange this morning.


The herd got spooked...

 
Brought to you by Bruce Fanjoy.

Already well on it's way to meeting the 500 verified signatures requirement for online petitions.

Petition to the House of Commons​

Whereas:
  • Canada faces increasing national security risks in a complex and shifting geopolitical landscape, and the Canadian Security Intelligence Service (CSIS) warns that political parties, elected officials, and candidates are potential targets for foreign interference;
  • In this context, it is in Canada’s national interest for every federal party leader to hold top-secret security clearance: This ensures that all leaders are properly briefed on potential national security threats within their respective parties and take timely, informed action to protect Canada’s interests; and
  • The leader of the Conservative Party of Canada refuses to seek top-secret security clearance, and this is a failure of leadership and exposes Canada to avoidable national security risks.
We, the undersigned, citizens, call upon the House of Commons to require all federal party leaders to obtain and maintain top-secret security clearance to ensure they are fully informed of threats to Canada’s national security and able to act decisively to protect Canadians and our democracy.

 
Brought to you by Bruce Fanjoy.

Already well on it's way to meeting the 500 verified signatures requirement for online petitions.



While I absolutely think any federal party leader, cabinet minister etc should be able to be cleared for TS, and I will not personally take seriously any who are unable or unwilling to, I don’t see how it can be made a legal requirement in practical terms. The Charter clearly lays out a broad right to candidacy for office, and I don’t believe voluntarily excluding oneself from being security cleared would justify abrogating that right.
 
Back
Top