HavokFour
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,963
- Points
- 1,040
Remember his reaction to the Doug Ford ad at first then 4 days later…
True, and the recent flip flop on who was to blame for holding up peace in Ukraine.
Give it a good 10 days to marinate.

Remember his reaction to the Doug Ford ad at first then 4 days later…
Now we're cooking with Canola. They publicly urge Canadians to invest domestically while the government simultaneously prioritizes trade, capital flows, and market access abroad through its own policy choices.In what way? Are you referring to MC holding foreign investments prior to entering politics? Or actual government policy?
Are you referring to governments investing? Or politicians holding investment portfolios?They do. They can also act like hypocrites when they urge this and turn around and invest in foreign countries themselves.
No idea. I know that these predate his entry into politics.For example, Carney has investments in something like 150+ US companies, and 30ish European conpanies. Do you know how many Canadian companies he has stock in? I can give you a hint if you'd like.
From the Liberal platform:During the election it was heavily implied patriotic Canadians should invest more in Canada, and we should get away from US contracts and such. Meanwhile US contracts were business as usual.
The hypocrisy is in urging Canadians to keep capital at home while the government itself prioritizes foreign markets, trade deals, and external investment over domestic investment.Are you referring to governments investing? Or politicians holding investment portfolios?
They do. When I looked at the report he had stock in 3 Canadian companies. Easy to argue Carney personally benefits from a stronger America. Politics often comes down to optics.No idea. I know that these predate his entry into politics.
Just want for the news on the 20th.Remember his reaction to the Doug Ford ad at first then 4 days later…
I don't understand why you believe these are mutually exclusive?Now we're cooking with Canola. They publicly urge Canadians to invest domestically while the government simultaneously prioritizes trade, capital flows, and market access abroad through its own policy choices.
The issue isn’t so much personal investments, it’s the contradiction between the messaging to Canadians and the government’s economic posture.
Think politicians telling Canadians to stay home and respect covid19 mask rules - from their hotel room on vacation in Jamaica.
The hypocrisy comes from emphasis and outcomes. When the government tells Canadianss to keep capital at home while its own policy choices consistently prioritize foreign market access and overseas investment over domestic capacity, the messaging stops lining up with the behaviour.I don't understand why you believe these are mutually exclusive?
We're a trading nation. Developing trade with other countries while encouraging "Buy Canadian" at home (especially government purchases where feasible) isn't controversial or hypocritical.
That's the reality of a being a smaller country with a smaller population.The hypocrisy comes from emphasis and outcomes. When the government tells Canadianss to keep capital at home while its own policy choices consistently prioritize foreign market access and overseas investment over domestic capacity, the messaging stops lining up with the behaviour.
Once government aligns their messaging with policy I'll get back to you with an answer.Is the solution to stop encouraging "Buy Canadian", or stop securing foreign market access?
Turns out you can chew gum and walk a the same time.Once government aligns thwir messaging with policy I'll get back to you with an answer.
We're obviously posted to different bases.Turns out you can chew gum and walk a the same time.
Interesting poll.
I am sharing it because I find it interesting, with the full respect of the decision made here
The results are pretty damning either way.I have seen this pop up a few times in my SM algorithm.
I would have worded the options differently:
If Canada were to face a situation in which the USA were to use force against Canadian territory what would be your primary response:
a) Personally take up arms and defend Canada, be it uniformed or partisan, even if the outcome is uncertain; or
b) Personally avoid confrontation and attempt to maintain some personal normalcy in your life.
LOL - don't answer that question in any manner.I have seen this pop up a few times in my SM algorithm.
I would have worded the options differently:
If Canada were to face a situation in which the USA were to use force against Canadian territory what would be your primary response:
a) Personally take up arms and defend Canada, be it uniformed or partisan, even if the outcome is uncertain; or
b) Personally avoid confrontation and attempt to maintain some personal normalcy in your life.
![]()
Trump reverses course, supports Canada-China trade deal
U.S. President Donald Trump was asked to respond to news that Prime Minister Carney and Chinese President Xi Jinping came to an agreement on trade.www.ctvnews.ca
Response from Trump.
I'd like to see the responses if the question was asked under the scenario of a US President, who was a Democrat, was saying/doing similar things to Canada and the world as this current one is.The results are pretty damning either way.
LOL - don't answer that question in any manner.
You're answer might just decide your fate if the question being asked does occur.
Considering we've had Democrat, Republican, Democrat, Republican, and only one side has tried to go out of their way to hurt Canada, I suppose we will never find out.I'd like to see the responses if the question was asked under the scenario of a US President, who was a Democrat, was saying/doing similar things to Canada and the world as this current one is.
I have no doubt the Conservative supporters would change their position. Again, that's damning.Wonder if the Conversative supporters would change their responses - just like I wonder if the Liberal/NDP supporters would.
They probably foolishly thought we didn't face threats in our hemisphere. Silly them.Also interesting to see the response from the NDP supporters since a significant number of them have always wanted to defund/defang the CAF and the Police. So many 'Project Plowshares' among their faithful.
Trump is a RINO. Ill await judgement on his successorsConsidering we've had Democrat, Republican, Democrat, Republican, and only one side has tried to go out of their way to hurt Canada, I suppose we will never find out.
I have no doubt the Conservative supporters would change their position. Again, that's damning.
They probably foolishly thought we didn't face threats in our hemisphere. Silly them.