- Reaction score
- 3,978
- Points
- 1,260
When something like that occurs, the "significant deficiencies from an inspection found with various systems", that doesn't sound like 1 issue found with 1 ship and another issue found on another ship, it sounds like there was issues found across multiple ships occurring across the same systems/platforms.Orcas had a significant corrective maintenance (wouldn't call it a midlife) around 2021, when Topshee was Commander Maritime Forces Pacific. There were significant deficiencies from an inspection found with various systems, most of them safety related. Topshee grounded the entire fleet until it was overhauled and/or sorted out. Took a year or so to fix.
I don't know the details just watercooler info.
If it was this, would this be caused by a lack of funding to address the issues as they were presenting themselves, thus the documented decision was to 'note it and do nothing' multiply times?
Would this have been caused by "insufficient skills/training" by those maintaining the ships and their inability to properly identify these issues, thus they were allowed to smolder until they failed or were about to fail?
Or, the worst scenario, would this be a case of 'dereliction of duty'?