• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Maritime Coastal Defence Vessels (MCDVs)

With the prospect of an ORCA-class replacement on the horizon, perhaps it’s time to take a serious look at developing something a little more robust and versatile than the current design. While the primary role will remain training, the new class should not be limited to that alone.

The replacement vessel should be designed to function as an operational platform if required, able to embark limited mission packages, operate small drones or RHIBs, and mount .50-calibre machine guns when the situation demands. It should also be capable of handling moderate sea states on both coasts, steel hull, bow thruster ensuring that future RCN and Naval Reserve crews can train and operate in realistic conditions rather than being confined to fair-weather limits. The ships should be civilian standards, easy to maintain and able to be docked and maintained in any small yard.

With the expansion of the RCN and growing emphasis on coastal and Arctic presence, enough of these new vessels should be procured for both coasts, with the possibility of additional hulls dedicated to the Naval Reserve. A modern, seaworthy platform could bridge the gap between classroom instruction and real-world seamanship while offering the flexibility to fill secondary operational roles such as surveillance, patrol, and maritime security when required.
 
With the prospect of an ORCA-class replacement on the horizon, perhaps it’s time to take a serious look at developing something a little more robust and versatile than the current design. While the primary role will remain training, the new class should not be limited to that alone.

The replacement vessel should be designed to function as an operational platform if required, able to embark limited mission packages, operate small drones or RHIBs, and mount .50-calibre machine guns when the situation demands. It should also be capable of handling moderate sea states on both coasts, steel hull, bow thruster ensuring that future RCN and Naval Reserve crews can train and operate in realistic conditions rather than being confined to fair-weather limits. The ships should be civilian standards, easy to maintain and able to be docked and maintained in any small yard.

With the expansion of the RCN and growing emphasis on coastal and Arctic presence, enough of these new vessels should be procured for both coasts, with the possibility of additional hulls dedicated to the Naval Reserve. A modern, seaworthy platform could bridge the gap between classroom instruction and real-world seamanship while offering the flexibility to fill secondary operational roles such as surveillance, patrol, and maritime security when required.
And there you have it...
 
I am sorry, but as far as I am concerned: Wrong! Wrong! Wrong! and Wrong!

Well, not quite. I agree that they should be capable of handling moderate sea states.

These are tier one training vessels for young officers who are going to sea for the first time more or less on their own on a training mission that seeks to integrate classroom and simulator acquired knowledge and consolidate it (all of this is from instructional design theory - if you don't know, ask a TDO). No operational duties such as surveillance, patrol or maritime security.

A single overarching aim: navigation and basic bridgemanship training, Period, end of statement.

If you try and get a platform that can do these other things, it will be stolen by the RCN command to actually do these other missions and deprive VENTURE from getting the sea time it needs to fulfill its training duties.
 
If you try and get a platform that can do these other things, it will be stolen by the RCN command to actually do these other missions and deprive VENTURE from getting the sea time it needs to fulfill its training duties.

What makes you think the RCN wouldn't 'steal' them anyways?
 
If you try and get a platform that can do these other things, it will be stolen by the RCN command to actually do these other missions and deprive VENTURE from getting the sea time it needs to fulfill its training duties.
Bet the only real fix for that is having trots of the things.

Would a YAG-ier profile; longer and lower, with (assuming the same capacity) the galley and classroom space dropped into the hull (which would, incidentally, probably make things more flexible for other uses) likely handle better?
 
Back
Top