- Reaction score
- 36
- Points
- 560
A somewhat bizzare and counterintuative idea. "New Democracy" actually has a political meaning: absolute majority rule (with no intervening checks and balances, much like the classical eklassia, whipped up by socialist demagogues)
http://rightoncourse.blogspot.com/2008/07/democratic-party-of-canada.html
http://rightoncourse.blogspot.com/2008/07/democratic-party-of-canada.html
The Democratic Party of Canada?
Michael Byers, the NDP's star candidate in Vancouver Centre, has recently come out in favour of changing the party's name. A name which the party has held since its inception in 1961 when the CCF and the CLC decided to become a single socialist party.
Here are some excerpts from the Globe and Mail where Byers advocates for the change.
It's time for the NDP to take on more maturity, he says, and drop the "New." He wants it to be called simply the Democratic Party, which would link it to the U.S. Democrats. "It's something that I'm personally proposing and will pursue," says Mr. Byers. "I've been talking to people. It resonates."
(interpolation: an interesting idea for an anti American party)
...
Just calling them the Democrats would also widen the party's reach, make it sound more accessible. "It will be an indicator of the maturity of the party," Mr. Byers says. He likes the U.S. connection. "In many ways, Barack Obama's platform is close to Jack Layton's platform."
Byers is correct, the 'New' in New Democrats is somewhat paradoxical for a party which celebrated its 47th birthday just last month.
However, one of the justifications that Byers gives for his proposed name change is very interesting. He wants the New Democrats to become associated with the US Democratic Party, and by default Democrat US Presidential candidate Barack Obama. Trying to link a socialist anti-American party from Canada with an American liberal political party absolutely smacks of political opportunism. The only reason why Byers wants to the NDP to have this kind of superficial connection is because of Obama's popularity amongst Canadians.
Byers also thinks that his proposed name change would be enough to re-energize the party and propel it to political success:
Without a breakout issue, the party needs an attention-getter, which a new moniker would provide. For years it has toyed with the idea of name changes, but has always backed away.
Give Canadians more credit. They will readily see through such a charade, as they have in the past. Other political parties have tried it, and without success. If this is one of the main reasons for the NDP to change their name, then they're in trouble.
If the New Democrats truly want to become a mainstream party, then they have to completely reinvent themselves. Simply using a band-aid solution such as a name change will not reverse their political fortunes.
Posted by Scott at 12:23 PM