• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

New Canadian Shipbuilding Strategy

  • Thread starter Thread starter GAP
  • Start date Start date
GR66, thanks for the posting.

“and the Protecteur-class would sustain both.”

Topshee has mentioned that the Corvettes will need to be rated PC6 minus. If so, won’t future AORs need to be similarly rated to provide support to warships operating in the Arctic.
Which would be cheaper, a new build Corvette or outfitting the AOPS with appropriate radar, ESSM, and a bigger gun?
If the AOPS were "properly" outfitted wouldn't that reduce the number of Corvettes Topshee is asking for?
 
Seas Span is a large company that has multiple divisions.

Again cheap dollar and limited yard space.

Outside of the Canadian Military recently, how many ships (major and small) does Seaspan build in their BC yards?
Yes they do lots of maintenance and dry dock work.
The CEO of Seaspan, Kyle Washington, is a Canadian. But I just wish the company itself wasn’t owned by his American dad who owns the parent organization (the Washington Companies). Still I haven’t seen any signs of conflicted loyalties. But you never know in this day and age of Trump, Hoekstra and Lutnick. Political and economic events turn on a dime any more.
 
Last edited:
It sounds as if, for the CDC, he might be looking for something like the Rasmussen (205O tonnes fully loaded, PC6, 70 m, crew of 18 + 25, helo deck, mini CB90, 1x 76, 2x 12.7, ESSMs and torpedos) but perhaps with a bit longer legs.

Too slow, Topshee is looking for mid twenty knots. He wants a Halifax in a smaller package. Listen to Topshee’s interview with Noah:
 
Too slow, Topshee is looking for mid twenty knots. He wants a Halifax in a smaller package. Listen to Topshee’s interview with Noah:
I'm thinking something like this:
 
Seas Span is a large company that has multiple divisions.

Again cheap dollar and limited yard space.

Outside of the Canadian Military recently, how many ships (major and small) does Seaspan build in their BC yards?
Yes they do lots of maintenance and dry dock work.
The BC Ferries buys their new ferries off shore where our dollars go further (high dollar).
 
It is certainly the case for the last number of years but later delivered ferries such as the Island-class and Salish-class, were built in Romania and Poland because of pricing.
I forgot to mention the big Coastal-class ferries that were built in Germany. Before the Coastals, BC Ferries had the Queens, which were built in either North Vancouver and Victoria and stayed in service until the end of their useful lives. Somewhere in the 1990s the provincial government had 3 PacifiCat class (catamarans) built in North Vancouver and they were a failure and retired in short order. The following elected provincial government choose to buy off shore for new ferries. All succeeding governments followed suit.
 
Which would be cheaper, a new build Corvette or outfitting the AOPS with appropriate radar, ESSM, and a bigger gun?
If the AOPS were "properly" outfitted wouldn't that reduce the number of Corvettes Topshee is asking for?
I think the problem there again would be speed. They make about 8 kts less than what Topshee says they’re looking for.
 
Which would be cheaper, a new build Corvette or outfitting the AOPS with appropriate radar, ESSM, and a bigger gun?
If the AOPS were "properly" outfitted wouldn't that reduce the number of Corvettes Topshee is asking for?
AOPS is fundamentally built as a non-combatant vessel and no amount of retrofitting or redesigning of the ship can effectively change that. It is an exceptionally large design with big spaces, wide open corridors and a lot of empty space for non-combatant roles. It's slow and lumbering with no real room to retrofit any of the required radar, weaponry and other equipment to be a combatant. It's basically like trying to transform a pickup truck into a main battle tank, total lost cause.

I'm thinking something like this:
Topshee has specifically stated that he wants something that is domestically designed, built and contains as much domestically sourced equipment as possible. That Danish design is getting closer, although its still too slow and too heavy on the ice class compared to what Topshee wants. He wants PC6, which is basically what the CCG's new Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel has. Too high of an ice class makes the hull and design unsuited to war like traits, which is not what is being looked at here.
 
AOPS is fundamentally built as a non-combatant vessel and no amount of retrofitting or redesigning of the ship can effectively change that. It is an exceptionally large design with big spaces, wide open corridors and a lot of empty space for non-combatant roles. It's slow and lumbering with no real room to retrofit any of the required radar, weaponry and other equipment to be a combatant. It's basically like trying to transform a pickup truck into a main battle tank, total lost cause.

Thank you! People need to realize the capability limitations of these platforms.
 
AOPS is fundamentally built as a non-combatant vessel and no amount of retrofitting or redesigning of the ship can effectively change that. It is an exceptionally large design with big spaces, wide open corridors and a lot of empty space for non-combatant roles. It's slow and lumbering with no real room to retrofit any of the required radar, weaponry and other equipment to be a combatant. It's basically like trying to transform a pickup truck into a main battle tank, total lost cause.


Topshee has specifically stated that he wants something that is domestically designed, built and contains as much domestically sourced equipment as possible. That Danish design is getting closer, although its still too slow and too heavy on the ice class compared to what Topshee wants. He wants PC6, which is basically what the CCG's new Offshore Oceanographic Science Vessel has. Too high of an ice class makes the hull and design unsuited to war like traits, which is not what is being looked at here.
Thanks, if I don't ask then I don't know, now I know.
 
Back
Top