Czech_pivo Army.ca Fixture Subscriber Reaction score 7,929 Points 1,260 Today at 11:17 #7,181 Rainbow1910 said: You can also look to the RFA to see the pitfalls of letting your key logistical capabilities fall to a unionized civilian workforce..... Click to expand... Now that sounds worrisome.
Rainbow1910 said: You can also look to the RFA to see the pitfalls of letting your key logistical capabilities fall to a unionized civilian workforce..... Click to expand... Now that sounds worrisome.
Halifax Tar Army.ca Legend Reaction score 19,637 Points 1,260 Today at 11:29 #7,182 Rainbow1910 said: You can also look to the RFA to see the pitfalls of letting your key logistical capabilities fall to a unionized civilian workforce..... Click to expand... Czech_pivo said: Now that sounds worrisome. Click to expand... I think you underestimate how permeated our (the CAFs) logistical capabilities have been by a unionized workforce. Having said that no one having an easy time getting people to sea right now. Be they Navies or Merchant.
Rainbow1910 said: You can also look to the RFA to see the pitfalls of letting your key logistical capabilities fall to a unionized civilian workforce..... Click to expand... Czech_pivo said: Now that sounds worrisome. Click to expand... I think you underestimate how permeated our (the CAFs) logistical capabilities have been by a unionized workforce. Having said that no one having an easy time getting people to sea right now. Be they Navies or Merchant.
D dapaterson Army.ca Dinosaur Subscriber Donor Reaction score 41,383 Points 1,210 Today at 11:42 #7,183 Halifax Tar said: I think you underestimate how permeated our (the CAFs) logistical capabilities have been by a unionized workforce. Click to expand... That's not a nice thing to say about the RCLS
Halifax Tar said: I think you underestimate how permeated our (the CAFs) logistical capabilities have been by a unionized workforce. Click to expand... That's not a nice thing to say about the RCLS
Halifax Tar Army.ca Legend Reaction score 19,637 Points 1,260 Today at 11:44 #7,184 dapaterson said: That's not a nice thing to say about the RCLS Click to expand... It truly wasn't meant as a slight. Just stating the fact our logistics branch is very civilian heavy.
dapaterson said: That's not a nice thing to say about the RCLS Click to expand... It truly wasn't meant as a slight. Just stating the fact our logistics branch is very civilian heavy.
Kirkhill Puggled and Wabbit Scot. Subscriber Donor Reaction score 13,447 Points 1,160 Today at 12:02 #7,185 Rainbow1910 said: You can also look to the RFA to see the pitfalls of letting your key logistical capabilities fall to a unionized civilian workforce..... Click to expand... And some place between the RN and the RFA lies the RNVR. Those RFA ships could also be manned by RNVR crews, as could Ships Taken Up From Trade.
Rainbow1910 said: You can also look to the RFA to see the pitfalls of letting your key logistical capabilities fall to a unionized civilian workforce..... Click to expand... And some place between the RN and the RFA lies the RNVR. Those RFA ships could also be manned by RNVR crews, as could Ships Taken Up From Trade.
Colin Parkinson Army.ca Relic Subscriber Reaction score 18,288 Points 1,160 11 minutes ago #7,186 Mind you if the crews are civilian working for a company, then the pension obligations don't fall onto the government/CAF.
Mind you if the crews are civilian working for a company, then the pension obligations don't fall onto the government/CAF.