• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Our North - SSE Policy Update Megathread

The security problem in our North is not our own population. I see some real fear-mongering in this thread that only distracts from the real security challenges.

The CAF is actually quite busy in the north. We had a battalion at JPMRC Alaska this past winter integrated into an US Army IBCT. All of our Arctic Response Company Groups (ARCG) exercised or participated in Op NANOOK. In the coming year we'll have an Engineer Squadron with an IBCT at JPMRC Alaska and the ARCGs will continue to exercise and operate in the North. There will be US participation in all of those activities. One thing we have as a force-multiplier that we kind-of take for granted is our cold weather individual training. All CA personnel have (or should have) the Cold Weather Operator qualification - a five day course. Selected leaders have the Cold Weather Operations Leader course and others have the Arctic Operations course. All units conduct winter warfare/cold weather training each year, so we have a baseline of IT. Not all arctic/northern operations are extreme cold weather situations, but some certainly are.

Our biggest ace-in-the-hole are the Canadian Rangers (CR). The CR are always active. There are over 5,000 CRs in 197 Patrols, with many of those Patrols at high latitudes. Basically, if there is a community there is a CR patrol. CA units will always have CR with them when operating in the north. The CRs conduct long-range patrols. For example, they will conduct an 800 km patrol this coming winter in the Yukon.

The RCAF is almost always involved in getting CA units into the North, and of course they exercised CF18s out of the FOL in Inuvik in August. The RCN was part of Op NANOOK (there are four operations that are part of NANOOK, one of which is RCN-focused and they are usually part of two others. The AOPS open up the playbook for Arctic and northern operations.

I will come back to logistics. This is everything in the north. Without fuel, you don't have power. So in the summer you are useless and in the winter you are dead.
 
I'm guessing that it's more like modern the Scottish and Canadians of Scottish ancestry. I still love the pipes, and wear RCN tartan in my mess dress, but I don't care about Scottish independence, or any of the other concerns of modern Scottish people.

Also, Canadians of Scottish descent tend to be more Scottish than the Scots!

😁
 
I will come back to logistics. This is everything in the north. Without fuel, you don't have power. So in the summer you are useless and in the winter you are dead.
I don’t think anyone who’s been up there misses that point. In fact I see a bunch of us suggesting that more effort be put into the infrastructure up there to lessen the logistics efforts that need to occur to support activities up there especially during the Winter
 
Further to the impact of physiology on culture and habitat.


Clues emerging about Arctic gene, diet and health​

By Yereth Rosen
Updated: May 31, 2016Published: November 29, 2014
For thousands of years, the indigenous people of the far north survived the extreme cold of their environment with a diet of fat and protein and hardly any carbohydrates.

Now, there is evidence that the historic diet based on foods like muktuk and seal and walrus meat has been imprinted on the genes of Inupiat, Yupik and other northern peoples, with health effects that are potentially dangerous for babies and young children but potentially helpful for adults.


At issue is a gene that produces a key enzyme used in the liver: carnitine palmitoyltransferase 1A, or CPT1A for short.

The enzyme is needed in the process that burns fat for energy within the liver. It allows the body to switch between burning glucose -- the simple sugar broken down from carbohydrates -- and burning body fat. The CPT1A gene in some far-north indigenous people dramatically slows the burning of stored fat, preventing the body from getting the energy it needs to function.

That Arctic variant version of CPT1A is found in Inuit, Inupiat and Yupik populations of Alaska, Canada and Greenland and among some Natives in British Columbia, mostly on Vancouver Island, and the Tsimshian of Southeast Alaska who are related to them. It is not found among Interior Alaska or Canadian Native groups like the Athabascan and Cree, nor is it found among Natives in the Lower 48 states.

It is now confirmed in the indigenous people of northern Siberia as well. A Cambridge University-led study, published in October in the American Journal of Human Genetics, found that 68 percent of test subjects carried the gene. An earlier study by the many of the same researchers, published in May in the journal PLOS ONE, identified the CPT1A gene as one of several carried by indigenous Siberians that appeared to have been shaped by Arctic conditions.

The findings are the first to provide concrete evidence backing up the idea that CPT1A Arctic variant is a product of the Arctic environment and Arctic diet, said David Koeller, a pediatrician and geneticist at Oregon Health and Science University and an expert in CPT1A Arctic variant.

"I always assumed this gene was being selected for, but we had no definite proof," said Koeller, a leading researcher in the subject.

Medical risks for the youngest patients​

For babies and young children, undiagnosed CPT1A Arctic variant can mean dire consequences during sickness or other periods when children might go without food. Those who go for long periods without breast milk, formula or other food -- generally six to eight hours -- are at risk for low blood sugar, known as hypoglycemia, and possibly worse.

"If it stays low enough long enough, they can get seizures," said Matt Hirschfeld, director of maternal child health at the Alaska Native Medical Center.

The variant is associated with infant mortality in Alaska, British Columbia and in the Canadian Arctic territory of Nunavut, where infant mortality rates from all causes are three times the Canadian average. Fatal cases seem to involve infants and children who suffer respiratory diseases, which are big chronic problems in rural areas of the far north.

There is also evidence that CPT1A Arctic variant is associated with serious respiratory and ear infections in Alaska, according to a 2013 study led by the Alaska Division of Public Health and co-authored by Koeller. It is not clear, Koeller said, whether the children with the Arctic variant are more vulnerable to acquiring infections in the first place or just more likely to have their infections become serious, and therefore more likely to be treated at a clinic or hospital and to have their cases reported.

The findings result in some explicit medical instruction for parents and caregivers of Native children with the Arctic gene: A sick baby or small child who hasn't eaten -- because of vomiting, prolonged sleep or other effects of illness -- should get glucose fluids through breast milk, formula, drinks like Pedialyte or, if necessary, an intravenous glucose drip, experts say. Caregivers should make sure affected children carrying the gene eat frequently, and they are advised to consult with health providers and state officials once the gene has been identified.

Anecdotal evidence is that some adults have long coped with the effects of this gene, if unknowingly, Hirschfeld said. They may talk about how they make sure to carry along snacks if they are engaged in strenuous activity like hunting, he said. After a few hours of exertion and no eating, as these adults describe it, they get sluggish, sleepy and "real jittery," classic signs of hypoglycemia, Hirschfeld said. "They'd have a candy bar, and they'd snap out of it."

Adults, with their larger bodies, can store more sugar in their blood and livers, and even those with the Arctic variant of the gene are able to fast for longer periods than children, unless they are exercising strenuously, Hirschfeld said.

The most serious problems afflict the youngest children, who can't get their own food when they need it, which is why it's important to detect the condition at birth.

The routine health screenings performed on all newborns in Alaska include tests for CPT1A Arctic variant, among the approximately 50 targeted conditions. Drops of blood are taken from babies' feet and spread on test cards to be analyzed for, among other things, signs of how the CPT1A enzyme is functioning. Analysis is done at the Northwest Regional Newborn Screening Program in Oregon, which handles newborn screenings for Alaska and five other states.

That has been the case for only about a decade. Prior to late 2003, when CPT1A tests became part of routine Alaska infant screening, there were only about 30 or 40 confirmed cases in the world of what was then called "CPT1A deficiency." It affected people outside of Arctic indigenous populations, was considered a random mutation, and resulted in near-total shutdown of the CPT1A function.

Once signs emerged that something similar was affecting Native children, researchers found that the gene was functioning differently, at a low level rather than the near-total shutdown seen elsewhere. This version became known as "CPT1A Arctic variant."

"It's not 'deficiency' anymore because, really, that's the normal gene," said Hirschfeld, who with Koeller and other colleagues, conducted some clinical trials to confirm the characteristics.

From late 2003 to mid-2006, according to the Alaska Division of Public Health's Epidemiology Section, 38 infants were identified through the new screenings as having CPT1A Arctic variant -- roughly equivalent to all the known CPT1A deficiency cases in the world at that time. As of now, about 900 Alaska babies have tested positive for CPT1A Arctic variant, Hirschfeld said.

Screenings used today are imperfect, however, because the test looks for the metabolic effects of the Arctic variant, which are not always apparent. A new type of newborn screening process, developed by Koeller and his colleagues, will look for the associated gene itself, meaning identification of all cases.

That new test is planned for introduction in Alaska next year, though administrative approvals are still pending and funding has yet to be arranged.

Once the new test is in place, expect 700 babies to be diagnosed each year with CPT1A Arctic variant, an estimate based on modeling, Hirschfeld said.

Despite the risks associated with it, experts stress that CPT1A Arctic variant is not a disease or disability, but a natural genetic condition for some people.

"The gene is, in and of itself, fairly neutral. It's a matter of context," Koeller said.

A genetic advantage in a harsh climate?​

There are signs that the Arctic variant of the gene can provide health advantages.

The latest Cambridge study hypothesizes that the arctic version CPT1A gene gave a metabolic advantage in the past, when there was strict adherence to the traditional high-fat diet, but that lifestyle changes have created a disadvantage. "The deleterious effect of the mutation might be explained by a change from the traditional diet to a more carbohydrate-based one or by recent cultural shifts and environmental stressors such as fasting and pathogens," Alexia Cardona, a lead author of both Cambridge studies on CPT1A, said in an email.

There are also signs of modern protections against obesity-related ills, at least among people eating a traditional diet.

One study of Yup'ik adults in Western Alaska found relatively low levels of diabetes and metabolic syndrome, even for people with a high level of body fat. That study, published in 2007 and led by Bert Boyer of the Institute of Arctic Biology at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, cited a "traditional diet rich in polyunsaturated fatty acids" as a potential factor.

A more recent study by 10 researchers, including Boyer and others at the Institute of Arctic Biology, cited the Arctic variant of CPT1A as a reason for the "healthy obesity" found among Alaska Yup'ik people. The Arctic variant appeared to be protective regardless of test subjects' body weight, said the study, published in 2012 in the Journal of Lipid Research.

If this genetic trait evolved in tandem with the traditional fat-and-protein Arctic diet, said Koeller, it would be logical to expect it to manage the intake of some occasional carbohydrates.

"It slows down how quickly this enzyme can work, but it also eliminates the ability to shut it off in the presence of carbohydrates," he said. That means someone with the variant can continue to burn fatty foods for fuel, even "If you happen to get a few carbohydrates in your body, like you get a good crop of berries," he said.

But as with other aspects of CPT1A Arctic variant, the role of traditional foods has yet to be tested or fully understood.

Koeller, Hirschfeld and their colleagues envision some long-term studies to understand the health outcomes for children growing to adulthood and the differences, if they exist, between those eating traditional diets and those eating more carbohydrate-heavy Western diets.

The study, in the preliminary planning stages, has a noble objective -- to prevent serious illness and death among babies and young children, Koeller said. "The whole point of our study is so that we can understand it more so we can reduce that," he said.
 
And...


And...

The modern sledge dogs have more genetic overlap with other modern dog breeds than Zhokhov has, but the studies do not show us where or when this occurred. Nevertheless, among modern sledge dogs, the Greenland sledge dogs stands out and has the least overlap with other dogs, meaning that the Greenland sledge dog is probably the most original sledge dog in the world.
Common Features with Inuit and Polar Bears
In addition to advancing the common understanding of the origin of sledge dogs, the new study also teaches the researchers more about the differences between sledge dogs and other dogs. Sledge dogs do not have the same genetic adaptations to a sugar and starch rich diet that other dogs have. On the other hand, they have adaptations to high-fat diets, with mechanisms that are similar to those described for polar bears and Arctic people.
"This emphasises that sledge dogs and Arctic people have worked and adapted together for more than 9,500 years. We can also see that they have adaptations that are probably linked to improved oxygen uptake, which makes sense in relation to sledding and give the sledding tradition ancient roots," says Shyam Gopalakrishnan.
 
Why am I emphasising this?

Because a programme emphasising cultural affinities with Siberia and difference with Ottawa probably wouldn't serve Ottawa's needs well.

Ottawa needs to be ensuring that, like the Alaskan kids, the kids and adults are being supplied with the foods that meet their needs and doesn't cause them illnesses.

Less fruit and veggies, less corn flakes and more muktuk and seal meat in the local grocery store. Which changes the demands on logistics considerably.

 
Last edited:
I don’t think anyone who’s been up there misses that point. In fact I see a bunch of us suggesting that more effort be put into the infrastructure up there to lessen the logistics efforts that need to occur to support activities up there especially during the Winter
Yeah, but points on a map and random stashes are not the solution to anything. You can move a lot by air, but if you want large sustained operations then you need to maximize what you can get through land and/or sea lines of communication. How do we get fuel and other bulky material farther north before we have to switch it to tactical air transport? Sea lines of communication are not an option through parts of the year.

Canada has two rail routes that connect the north to the south. One ends in Churchill MB, and the other in Hay River NT. Is that adequate? We have an FOL in Rankin Inlet, but there is not even a highway to keep the fuel flowing from the south.
 
Why am I emphasising this?

Because a programme emphasising cultural affinities with Siberia and difference with Ottawa probably wouldn't serve Ottawa's needs well.

Ottawa needs to be ensuring that, like the Alaskan kids, the kids and adults are being supplied with the foods that meet their needs and doesn't cause them illnesses.

Less fruit and veggies, less corn flakes and more muktuk and seal meat in the local grocery store. Which changes the demands on logistics considerably.

And how do you suggest a government do that. Inuit are free to gather from the land as much as they want. Their elders and other cultural connections can inform younger generations of their history. If they want more locally harvested protein in a "grocery store" they are free to set up a retail network to do that; although I suggest that, culturally, they would not. Keep in mind the "grocery stores" are commercial entities, not government outlets. Do you suggest that the government somehow mandate what a store can and cannot sell?

Sharing the fruits of the land was somewhat easier when the population was tribe/clan based and semi-nomadic. With communities now largely fixed into townsites, the ability of the land - within a reasonable distance - to completely support those populations becomes limited.

The culture (all aboriginal cultures, not just in the far north) is evolving, perhaps faster than the genetics, but it is evolving whether we or the government likes it or not.

I'm not convinced a genetic similarity with the aboriginal peoples of northern Europe or Asia is as strong a bond as you suggest, certainly not to extent that they would somehow be more susceptible to their advancements.
 
and god forbid an enemy decides to keep us busy by taking out the fuel storage at a few communities up there. That would tie up all of our resources to sustain them in the short term.
 
And how do you suggest a government do that. Inuit are free to gather from the land as much as they want. Their elders and other cultural connections can inform younger generations of their history. If they want more locally harvested protein in a "grocery store" they are free to set up a retail network to do that; although I suggest that, culturally, they would not. Keep in mind the "grocery stores" are commercial entities, not government outlets. Do you suggest that the government somehow mandate what a store can and cannot sell?

Sharing the fruits of the land was somewhat easier when the population was tribe/clan based and semi-nomadic. With communities now largely fixed into townsites, the ability of the land - within a reasonable distance - to completely support those populations becomes limited.

The culture (all aboriginal cultures, not just in the far north) is evolving, perhaps faster than the genetics, but it is evolving whether we or the government likes it or not.

I'm not convinced a genetic similarity with the aboriginal peoples of northern Europe or Asia is as strong a bond as you suggest, certainly not to extent that they would somehow be more susceptible to their advancements.
In that video of the air link I posted awhile back, you can see people celebrating their links. Thankfully with allies. But I suspect many up there will have more in common with other northerners than with us Southern folk.
 
and god forbid an enemy decides to keep us busy by taking out the fuel storage at a few communities up there. That would tie up all of our resources to sustain them in the short term.
The other side of that is this: the enemy needs to establish fuel depots in the random nowhere of the arctic, then sustain those depots, after exposing their aims to us by attacking our obvious depots.

As much as is sucks for us in the Canadian arctic, it's sucks far more for anyone trying to impose themselves there.
 
The other side of that is this: the enemy needs to establish fuel depots in the random nowhere of the arctic, then sustain those depots, after exposing their aims to us by attacking our obvious depots.

As much as is sucks for us in the Canadian arctic, it's sucks far more for anyone trying to impose themselves there.
Very true, but if they don't have to sustain the civilian population, then they require much less fuel and food. I would like to see some thought given to make those communities more resilient to any natural disaster and to damage in any potentiel conflict. That resiliency will benefit the CAF in any Northern Ops as well. Part of that resilience will not only be infrastructure, but also building the skill sets in the communities to be more self reliant and able to fix and build their own systems.
While they need roads, communications, healthcare, bridges, airports, ports, fuel storage and power sources (diesel, battery, solar, and nuclear). They also need to build up skills in greenhouse food production, revival of traditional skills and knowledge, 3D printing, machine shop skills. So they can grow their own food, harvest their own country foods, make many of the parts and components needed throughout the year. That self-reliance will also improve the social fabric of the communities as well.
 
They also need to build up skills in greenhouse food production, revival of traditional skills and knowledge, 3D printing, machine shop skills. So they can grow their own food, harvest their own country foods, make many of the parts and components needed throughout the year. That self-reliance will also improve the social fabric of the communities as well.
What is the viability and impacts of greenhouse farming over the permafrost when the farm is to be large enough to sustain an Arctic hamlet of 1000 people? How do you anticipate sustaining skilled tradespersons and workshops in remote arctic villages that are smaller than what could sustain a similar capability in the south? Do you think the locals will embrace your plan to re-engineer their society?
 
The other side of that is this: the enemy needs to establish fuel depots in the random nowhere of the arctic, then sustain those depots, after exposing their aims to us by attacking our obvious depots.

As much as is sucks for us in the Canadian arctic, it's sucks far more for anyone trying to impose themselves there.

That is the point.

It is easier to get to Alert from Europe than it is from Canada.

The Gulf Stream keeps open water further north longer, if not indefinitely. European roads, rail, ports and airports, as well as cities are all further north. Circumpolar shortening together with those north south links makes it easier to support cities like Longyearbyen on Svalbard and Sirius Patrol caches on Greenland.

And Svalbard's Russo-Chinese base is as easily supported from Murmansk.

Our locals have already had problems with friendly Danes, Norwegians and Greenlanders poaching fish, shrimp and polar bears from our waters.

As has been commented, the Arctic is a big place. It is hard to keep track of everyone.
 
Yeah, but points on a map and random stashes are not the solution to anything. You can move a lot by air, but if you want large sustained operations then you need to maximize what you can get through land and/or sea lines of communication. How do we get fuel and other bulky material farther north before we have to switch it to tactical air transport? Sea lines of communication are not an option through parts of the year.
I’d suggest roads and rails to more places, and incentives to industry and individuals to make ‘more places on a map’. This isn’t something that just the CAF can do, it needs to be a GoC wide endeavor.
Canada has two rail routes that connect the north to the south. One ends in Churchill MB, and the other in Hay River NT. Is that adequate?
I think we in agreement that it isn’t.
We have an FOL in Rankin Inlet, but there is not even a highway to keep the fuel flowing from the south.
Which is an issue, but not the only issue.
 
What is the viability and impacts of greenhouse farming over the permafrost when the farm is to be large enough to sustain an Arctic hamlet of 1000 people? How do you anticipate sustaining skilled tradespersons and workshops in remote arctic villages that are smaller than what could sustain a similar capability in the south? Do you think the locals will embrace your plan to re-engineer their society?
Most people tend to enjoy things that make their lives easier.

Yes some thrive on the fact they are secluded and not dependent on others, but generally that is a very low %.

Folks already do greenhouses over permafrost - usually in stilt buildings that have a hearty insulation layer on the floor.
 
What is the viability and impacts of greenhouse farming over the permafrost when the farm is to be large enough to sustain an Arctic hamlet of 1000 people? How do you anticipate sustaining skilled tradespersons and workshops in remote arctic villages that are smaller than what could sustain a similar capability in the south? Do you think the locals will embrace your plan to re-engineer their society?
Like anything it takes time. My friend went up there to teach them how to build kayaks using traditional methods with both traditional and modern materials. Those skills had been lost. Teaching people how to make stuff with their hands will improve the social fabric and yes there will be idle times, but the ability to make a fitting inhouse rather than waiting weeks for it to be flown up is going to create positive impacts. We already see the results of not doing such things, now we need to create a better more engaged future. We have already re-engineered their society, now we need to fix the damage we did.

As for growing stuff, the groundwork is being laid



 
Folks already do greenhouses over permafrost - usually in stilt buildings that have a hearty insulation layer on the floor.
As for growing stuff, the groundwork is being laid



These are cute, but they are not going to make an agrarian independent community.

Like anything it takes time. … We have already re-engineered their society, now we need to fix the damage we did.
Repeating a wrong is not going to give us community buy-in. “White man from the south knows what’s best for you” will probably not help strengthen the link to Canada.
 
These are cute, but they are not going to make an agrarian independent community.
No not at all, but it helps reduce the need to bring things in. As they can expand the demand to import goods from the south decreases.

Repeating a wrong is not going to give us community buy-in. “White man from the south knows what’s best for you” will probably not help strengthen the link to Canada.
110%. Any work to strengthen the infrastructure and strengthen the communities up there needs input from those communities.

More roads and rails will help as they allow more potential providers of services (be it transport, foodstuffs, POL etc.). Which will reduce the prices that the community needs to pay.
 
Back
Top