• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date
I reckon that if they can squeeze 1.3 mbpd through the 890,000 bpd TMX then they a similarly dimensioned pipeline engineered for 1 mbpd could also be uprated to 1.3 mbpd or better.

The game plan is to get Alberta to 8 mbpd of production. Currently setting around 4.1 to 4.4 mbpd. We were just under 4 in 2024.
TMX took us from 300,000 to 890,000 - 590,000 bpd increase or 15% on the 4 mbpd. 1.3 mbpd from 890 kbpd means 9%.

8 mbpd means 4 increases of 25%.

Or 4 new pipelines.
That's a mighty undertaking. If we can get 1.5-2.5m/day more out the door = pushing us to 6 and beyond, that should be considered a solid win.
 
Alberta also has/had the ability to more than 800,000 bpd by rail.

They could start shipping out of Rupert in days if the Government and the locals would get out of the way.
A few months of beefing up the rail to the Bay.
Or shipping out of Saint John within days/weeks.
 
A few months of beefing up the rail to the Bay.
I'm sure the owner's of the Hudson's Bay ail line would love to hear how it could be upgraded in "a few months", along with new petroleum bulk handling and storage facilities.
 
Alberta also has/had the ability to more than 800,000 bpd by rail.

They could start shipping out of Rupert in days if the Government and the locals would get out of the way.
A few months of beefing up the rail to the Bay.
Or shipping out of Saint John within days/weeks.
You still need a loading facility and the space to juggle railcars, something in short supply in Rupert.
 
I'm sure the owner's of the Hudson's Bay ail line would love to hear how it could be upgraded in "a few months", along with new petroleum bulk handling and storage facilities.
Obviously someone who's never worked in the northern infrastructure line ...or for that matter any infrastructure.
 
You still need a loading facility and the space to juggle railcars, something in short supply in Rupert.
Disagree Rupert has a pretty decent space for rail cars. They just have to add a a couple loading arms. They already have most of the infrastructure in the area. A little something I found out very recently. The buggers have been loading LNG and Oil for the past few years there under the radar.
 
Disagree Rupert has a pretty decent space for rail cars. They just have to add a a couple loading arms. They already have most of the infrastructure in the area. A little something I found out very recently. The buggers have been loading LNG and Oil for the past few years there under the radar.
I was involved in the reviews of most of the projects there, juggling the railcars and trains is a complicated task, the loop on Ridely helps a lot, but everything has to go in/out on what is basically a single line in and single line out. Here are some of the proposed projects

Key Proposed Terminal Projects & Developments
  • Second Container Terminal (PRPA/DP World): A feasibility study is underway for a second container terminal on Ridley Island, which would add at least 2 million TEUs of annual capacity.
  • CANXPORT Project (Metlakatla/PRPA): A near-port facility designed to increase export capacity by 400,000 to 750,000 TEUs and improve intermodal container stuffing.
  • Ksi Lisisms LNG: A proposed 20 billion dollar liquefied natural gas project 100 km north of Prince Rupert, backed by the Nisga’a Nation and western partners.
  • Trigon Pacific Terminals (Berth Two Beyond Carbon): Converting a bulk terminal to handle low-carbon energy exports such as LPGs, hydrogen, and ammonia.
  • Wolverine Terminals: Constructing a marine fuel delivery service for cargo vessels, which will include a marine berth and rail barge system.
  • South Kaien Import Logistics Park (SKILP): An Indigenous-led 56-acre project for import transloading.
    Prince Rupert Port Authority +6
Supporting Infrastructure
 
Back
Top