• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Pipelines, energy and natural resources

  • Thread starter Thread starter QV
  • Start date Start date
More 'talk' than 'walk'... a sad but familiar tale....

Why do people put so much stock in MOU's? They are just an understanding that eventually you'll get back together and continue to talk about the subject. Sure, that's an oversimplification, but not far off.

Key Highlights of an MOU.

  • A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is defined as an agreement between parties and can be bilateral (two) or multilateral (more than two parties).
  • In order to prepare a complete and effective document (MOU), the parties affected must first reach an understanding acceptable by each party and clear information on the important stances for each of those parties.
  • The MOU, although a formal document, is not legally binding. It merely shows the willingness of each concerned party to take action to move the contract forward.
 
Are you under the impression that China is going to import oil and gas to replace domestic coal? Have people learned nothing about energy security from the last few months?
No.
I am a firm believer that energy is energy regardless of the source.
 
Why do people put so much stock in MOU's? They are just an understanding that eventually you'll get back together and continue to talk about the subject. Sure, that's an oversimplification, but not far off.

Key Highlights of an MOU.

  • A memorandum of understanding (MOU) is defined as an agreement between parties and can be bilateral (two) or multilateral (more than two parties).
  • In order to prepare a complete and effective document (MOU), the parties affected must first reach an understanding acceptable by each party and clear information on the important stances for each of those parties.
  • The MOU, although a formal document, is not legally binding. It merely shows the willingness of each concerned party to take action to move the contract forward.
and 100% predictable.
 
Then you should understand why dreams of displacing coal use in China with gas are just that: dreams.

Absolutely.

Just as I struggle with finding benefits in wind and solar over coal. I can accept a lot of costly remedies that make the burning of coal more efficient and cleaner with the before I reach the cost and inefficiency of wind and solar.

And I can move coal more easily than electricity.
 
Just as I struggle with finding benefits in wind and solar over coal. I can accept a lot of costly remedies that make the burning of coal more efficient and cleaner with the before I reach the cost and inefficiency of wind and solar.

The fact that you think wind and solar are more expensive than coal, is the root of your misunderstanding. Especially in China. The only reason coal use is up now is because oil and gas imports are down.

The clickbait article also ignores that China produces more PV panels and builds more nuclear plants that the rest of the world combined too. Their basic philosophy to energy production is "all of the above".

And I can move coal more easily than electricity.

Never mistake uniquely Canadian incompetence as universal.

They have no issues building HVDC lines in China.
 
Back
Top