From a 2013 article on Energy East about converting existing under utilized gas lines and converting them to oil.
View attachment 95033View attachment 95035
PS - presumably the 500 Mb/d should actually be 0.5 Mbpd or 500,000 bpd. Alberta production is 4 Mbpd.
The TransCanada Energy East project proposes converting 1865 miles of the natural gas Mainline system and constructing 870 miles of new pipeline to deliver at least 500 Mb/d of crude oil to eastern Canada from Alberta.
rbnenergy.com
There are three pipes in the Trans Canada Pipeline corridor at Cochrane. From Cochrane they run south to North Bay.
If one of those lines were converted to oil you could feed Sarnia.
If one of them were diverted to feed an LNG facility at Moosonee you could fill another line.
If you needed another pipe in the corridor the right of way has already been approved, validated and verified through 75 years of service.
If Quebec wants in they would be welcome. But both oil and gas should get to salt water as soon as possible, either in Manitoba or Ontario or both.
After all BC hasn't limited itself to one LNG port for its natural gas nor to one port for its coal. And it has a small oil port.
Coal Ports
- Roberts Bank at Vancouver
- Ridley Island at Prince Rupert
Natural Gas Ports
- Natural Gas Liquids from Prince Rupert
- Liquefied Natural Gas from Kitimat (2 phases and 1 independent)
- Liquefied Natural Gas from Squamish
- Liquefied Natural Gas from Gingolx upriver from Lax Kw'alaams and Prince Rupert
- Liquefied Natural Gas from Delta at Vancouver
Oil Ports
- Western Canadian Shale from Burnaby at Vancouver.
BC serves its own needs well.
Why not have terminals at Churchill, Nelson and Moosonee?