Political impacts of Ukraine war

[Brad Sallows]

Ukraine should ignore the deal.

If the US hasn't provided enough aid to swing things in Ukraine's favour across three-and-a-half years and two administrations, maybe Europe should take the hint and make a serious effort to back Ukraine sufficiently for Ukraine to win. GDP of NATO without US is roughly 5 times that of Russia.

 

[Czech_pivo]

Ukraine should ignore the deal.

If the US hasn't provided enough aid to swing things in Ukraine's favour across three-and-a-half years and two administrations, maybe Europe should take the hint and make a serious effort to back Ukraine sufficiently for Ukraine to win. GDP of NATO without US is roughly 5 times that of Russia.

What does Euro have that will allow the Ukkies to hit 500-1,500+km deep with precision?

 

[daftandbarmy]

What does Euro have that will allow the Ukkies to hit 500-1,500+km deep with precision?

A superior air force...

Just sayin'

 

[Czech_pivo]

A superior air force...

Just sayin'

They won’t give them that and neither we the US.
The Ukkies want Tomahawks so they can hit deeply and precisely Russian oil facilities. Do the Euros have something similar to provide the Ukkies in large enough numbers.

 

[Colin Parkinson]

They won’t give them that and neither we the US.
The Ukkies want Tomahawks so they can hit deeply and precisely Russian oil facilities. Do the Euros have something similar to provide the Ukkies in large enough numbers.

At the rate the Ukrainians are learning, innovating and adapting, they will be able to hit most of the important parts of Russia within 1-2 years.

 

[Czech_pivo]

At the rate the Ukrainians are learning, innovating and adapting, they will be able to hit most of the important parts of Russia within 1-2 years.

They don’t have that long.
They are running out of frontline soldiers.

 

[KevinB]

They won’t give them that and neither we the US.
The Ukkies want Tomahawks so they can hit deeply and precisely Russian oil facilities. Do the Euros have something similar to provide the Ukkies in large enough numbers.

Tomahawks

Seriously nothing is stopping any nation from sending their Tomahawks to Ukraine without American approval, sure America could get mad, but at the end of the day it’s not like the Tomahawk can’t be replicated by MBDA or other European nations.

It’s just been convenient to buy them from us due to economies of scale.

The same goes for any other piece of equipment. Sure there is a piece of paper saying you won’t - but then if America won’t protect Europe’s (and our own) interests, then who really gives a shit.

 

[Colin Parkinson]

They don’t have that long.
They are running out of frontline soldiers.

Russia is not doing that well either and it's running out of AFV's as well.

 

[daftandbarmy]

Russia is not doing that well either and it's running out of AFV's as well.

Others don't seem to agree...

Is Russia Outpacing NATO In Weapons Production?​

One area where Russia likely has the upper hand is tanks.

Like artillery, much of its tank production comes from restoring and modernizing Soviet tanks from storage. This would be the bulk of the 1,500 tanks Christopher Cavoli, NATO’s previous Supreme Allied Commander Europe, expects the Russian army to receive in 2025.

However, it has ramped up production “from scratch” of its modern T-90M main battle tank, producing about 280 per year.

Most countries in Europe, on the other hand, barely produce tanks. France hasn’t made a Leclerc in more than a decade, while Britain has ordered 148 of its new Challenger 3 tanks to be delivered by 2030. Germany is the exception, making 50 Leopard 2A8s per year.

Is Russia Outpacing NATO In Weapons Production?

RFE/RL and the Conflict Intelligence Team (CIT), an open-source intelligence group, analyzed Russian and Western weapons production to assess whether Russia really has a twelvefold lead over the US and its allies, as outlined by NATO chief Mark Rutte.

www.rferl.org

 

[Genetk44]

Tomahawks

Seriously nothing is stopping any nation from sending their Tomahawks to Ukraine without American approval, sure America could get mad, but at the end of the day it’s not like the Tomahawk can’t be replicated by MBDA or other European nations.

It’s just been convenient to buy them from us due to economies of scale.

The same goes for any other piece of equipment. Sure there is a piece of paper saying you won’t - but then if America won’t protect Europe’s (and our own) interests, then who really gives a shit.

 

[Genetk44]

With the possible exception of Joseph Kennedy.

And Lindberg, don’t forget him.

 

[RangerRay]

And Lindberg, don’t forget him.

Kennedy was an ambassador. I think Nazi sympathizer would be too strong to describe his isolationist and Anglo-phobic views. He resigned before the end of 1940.

Lindbergh was much closer to the Nazi-sympathizer spectrum, but was more of a garden variety anti-Semite and isolationist. Maybe fascist-adjacent. But he had no role in FDR’s administration.