• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Political impacts of Ukraine war

Ukraine should ignore the deal.

If the US hasn't provided enough aid to swing things in Ukraine's favour across three-and-a-half years and two administrations, maybe Europe should take the hint and make a serious effort to back Ukraine sufficiently for Ukraine to win. GDP of NATO without US is roughly 5 times that of Russia.
 
Ukraine should ignore the deal.

If the US hasn't provided enough aid to swing things in Ukraine's favour across three-and-a-half years and two administrations, maybe Europe should take the hint and make a serious effort to back Ukraine sufficiently for Ukraine to win. GDP of NATO without US is roughly 5 times that of Russia.
What does Euro have that will allow the Ukkies to hit 500-1,500+km deep with precision?
 
A superior air force...

Just sayin' ;)
They won’t give them that and neither we the US.
The Ukkies want Tomahawks so they can hit deeply and precisely Russian oil facilities. Do the Euros have something similar to provide the Ukkies in large enough numbers.
 
They won’t give them that and neither we the US.
The Ukkies want Tomahawks so they can hit deeply and precisely Russian oil facilities. Do the Euros have something similar to provide the Ukkies in large enough numbers.
At the rate the Ukrainians are learning, innovating and adapting, they will be able to hit most of the important parts of Russia within 1-2 years.
 
They won’t give them that and neither we the US.
The Ukkies want Tomahawks so they can hit deeply and precisely Russian oil facilities. Do the Euros have something similar to provide the Ukkies in large enough numbers.
Tomahawks ;)

Seriously nothing is stopping any nation from sending their Tomahawks to Ukraine without American approval, sure America could get mad, but at the end of the day it’s not like the Tomahawk can’t be replicated by MBDA or other European nations.

It’s just been convenient to buy them from us due to economies of scale.

The same goes for any other piece of equipment. Sure there is a piece of paper saying you won’t - but then if America won’t protect Europe’s (and our own) interests, then who really gives a shit.
 
Russia is not doing that well either and it's running out of AFV's as well.

Others don't seem to agree...

Is Russia Outpacing NATO In Weapons Production?​


One area where Russia likely has the upper hand is tanks.

Like artillery, much of its tank production comes from restoring and modernizing Soviet tanks from storage. This would be the bulk of the 1,500 tanks Christopher Cavoli, NATO’s previous Supreme Allied Commander Europe, expects the Russian army to receive in 2025.

However, it has ramped up production “from scratch” of its modern T-90M main battle tank, producing about 280 per year.

Most countries in Europe, on the other hand, barely produce tanks. France hasn’t made a Leclerc in more than a decade, while Britain has ordered 148 of its new Challenger 3 tanks to be delivered by 2030. Germany is the exception, making 50 Leopard 2A8s per year.

 
Tomahawks ;)

Seriously nothing is stopping any nation from sending their Tomahawks to Ukraine without American approval, sure America could get mad, but at the end of the day it’s not like the Tomahawk can’t be replicated by MBDA or other European nations.

It’s just been convenient to buy them from us due to economies of scale.

The same goes for any other piece of equipment. Sure there is a piece of paper saying you won’t - but then if America won’t protect Europe’s (and our own) interests, then who really gives a shit.
 
Last edited:
He's back to the 'Ungrateful wretches' script ...

Closing summary​

  • US President Donald Trump accused Ukraine’s leadership of having “zero gratitude” for US efforts to end the war as talks were underway in Geneva between delegations from the US, Ukraine, and some of its European allies.
  • His comments came as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy said there was now an understanding that the 28-point US-proposed plan could take into account Ukraine’s national interests (revisions are expected to be made to the provisions after negotiations).
  • The plan, details of which have been leaked, has widely been seen to favour Russia as it endorses some of Moscow’s key maximalist positions.
  • There is particular concern in European capitals about provisions that Ukraine agree to not join Nato and also limit the size of its armed forces.
  • Poland’s president, Donald Tusk, asked where Trump’s “peace plan” came from, after reports suggested an apparent admission by the US secretary of state, Marco Rubio, that the text was originally drafted by Moscow.
  • German Chancellor Friedrich Merz said he is “sceptical” the deal can be reached by Trump’s Thursday deadline, which may be extended after the US president said it was not his “final offer”. Merz rejected the provision in the plan that says Russia would rejoin the G8.
  • The European Commission president, Ursula von der Leyen, said Ukraine’s borders could not be changed by force. A limit on the country’s armed forces would leave it “vulnerable to future attack”, she said.
  • Turkey’s president, Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, said he would have a phone call with Vladimir Putin on Monday to discuss efforts to bring about an end to the war and said he will ask the Russian president to restart a deal for the safe passage of grains via the Black Sea.
  • The Russian defence ministry said this morning that Russian troops captured three villages across two regions of Ukraine: the villages of Tykhe and Odradne in the Dnipropetrovsk region and Petrivske in the Donetsk region.


 
And Lindberg, don’t forget him.

Kennedy was an ambassador. I think Nazi sympathizer would be too strong to describe his isolationist and Anglo-phobic views. He resigned before the end of 1940.

Lindbergh was much closer to the Nazi-sympathizer spectrum, but was more of a garden variety anti-Semite and isolationist. Maybe fascist-adjacent. But he had no role in FDR’s administration.
 
  • US President Donald Trump accused Ukraine’s leadership of having “zero gratitude” for US efforts to end the war as talks were underway in Geneva between delegations from the US, Ukraine, and some of its European allies.
Much like the USA won World War One and Two by themselves.
 
Kennedy was an amoral opportunist , Lindbergh had a bit more complexity going for him. Still a F'n As****e but a little more complex then Ambassador Kennedy.
 
Others don't seem to agree...

Is Russia Outpacing NATO In Weapons Production?​


One area where Russia likely has the upper hand is tanks.

Like artillery, much of its tank production comes from restoring and modernizing Soviet tanks from storage. This would be the bulk of the 1,500 tanks Christopher Cavoli, NATO’s previous Supreme Allied Commander Europe, expects the Russian army to receive in 2025.

However, it has ramped up production “from scratch” of its modern T-90M main battle tank, producing about 280 per year.

Most countries in Europe, on the other hand, barely produce tanks. France hasn’t made a Leclerc in more than a decade, while Britain has ordered 148 of its new Challenger 3 tanks to be delivered by 2030. Germany is the exception, making 50 Leopard 2A8s per year.

And.... if you follow the tea leaves, Russia is clearly stockpiling armour and infantry fighting vehicles, most of which is being held back for once the UAF is sufficiently attrited.

Russian gains are getting exponentially larger and they have created a series of operational dilemmas for the UAF:

Pokrovsk, Kupyansk, Siversk, Lyman, Konstantinovka, Huliapole, Vovchansk.

The Oretchetnye breakthrough north of Avdiivka has turned in to a 100+ mile wide advance that is slowly being chipped away at everyday.


 
Trump plan = surrender document...



Prof Michael Clarke analysis: Draft plan is a 'complete undermining' of Ukraine's sovereignty​


The US president has reportedly approved a 28-point peace proposal developed with Russia, which requires significant concessions from Ukraine.Sky's Michael Clarke says the draft 28-point plan is really "a surrender document" with clauses giving territory to Russia and reducing Ukraine's military, which would make the country even more vulnerable to future Russian attacks.


 
Most wars have some exchange of land when it's all over. I haven’t read the plan, so no idea what else is there. Just what the news has reported

However, on the land issue, it boils down to choice. Do you give up the land and end things? Or do you let it go on and on, for years? Let it take over a million more people, mostly your next generation. Destroy your economy even further, stop farming (Europe's Breadbasket), run the chance of further nuclear contamination, ala Chernoble? Or even the possible takeover of black site virology labs? Or maybe Russia wins and you lose the whole country.

I forget where I read it, but it was early on in the war, the areas Russia went after were mostly a pro Russian population anyway. Some didn't even speak Ukrainian and missed being part of Russia. YMMV.

Nobody wins if your country has no young people to carry on, your industry has stopped except for war materials, or your country is basically a smoking hole in the ground.

If you told soldiers on both sides they no longer needed to fight if they didn't want to, most would just start walking home. Cannon fodder has no spot at the political chess table. Put the politicians in helmets and vests and toss them into the trenches. Bet things end PDQ.
 
Most wars have some exchange of land when it's all over. I haven’t read the plan, so no idea what else is there. Just what the news has reported

However, on the land issue, it boils down to choice. Do you give up the land and end things? Or do you let it go on and on, for years? Let it take over a million more people, mostly your next generation. Destroy your economy even further, stop farming (Europe's Breadbasket), run the chance of further nuclear contamination, ala Chernoble? Or even the possible takeover of black site virology labs? Or maybe Russia wins and you lose the whole country.

I forget where I read it, but it was early on in the war, the areas Russia went after were mostly a pro Russian population anyway. Some didn't even speak Ukrainian and missed being part of Russia. YMMV.
I guess we know where thoughts on the Sudetenland and where it should have belonged in 1938.
 
Back
Top