• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Public service employment has grown by 31 per cent

I've actually said that during the pilot, and pointed out that's what we did for the $4B AJISS (AOPS/JSS ISSC) contract, so our $30M procure/maintain contract would probably be okay.

That didn't really work, so instead they added 2 years of work to it. To be fair they were the worker bees stuck implementing TBS directive to do it.

Maybe we'll get lucky and the TBS champion for this will get let go/shifted to a position of zero influence in the downsizing so they can stop spiking our tires.

I’m sure they’re just trying to help.

Some of the biggest challenges emerge from that kind of motivation ;)
 
I’m sure they’re just trying to help.

Some of the biggest challenges emerge from that kind of motivation ;)
I also pointed out fast tracking some steps by combining them, or agreeing they weren't needed is allowed under the policy but we had to jump through all the hoops first to figure out that it wasn't required.

Lord save me from people that want to help...
 
I also pointed out fast tracking some steps by combining them, or agreeing they weren't needed is allowed under the policy but we had to jump through all the hoops first to figure out that it wasn't required.

Lord save me from people that want to help...

I like working with the clients who say things like "We just won't provide them with that report anymore then see if they miss it" ;)
 
I like working with the clients who say things like "We just won't provide them with that report anymore then see if they miss it" ;)
I've done that before with a CO's approval for a twice daily message, we just included a note in one that we would consolidate the twice daily update to the morning one. No one noticed for about 5 weeks at CJOC, but they also had no idea we were sitting off the coast of Syria within range of their shore battery and about a mile away from the Russian carrier doing bombing runs on locals, and thought we were on a NATO booze cruise so that victory felt a bit hollow. Still, one less daily message to generate was a plus!

In this particular case we needed approval to go to the next round of SBCA (directors at CAF, PSPC and ISED to DGs at each) so that wasn't an option, and the whole thing was a mandatory approval gate (with 4 or 5 sub gates) to move onto RFP release, which still actually hasn't happened. It's just to buy some COTs gear, that meets a commercial standard, and then maintain it, for possibly it's lifespan (15 years) with options for a bit of maintainer training etc, so actually really straight forward.

This may have been the particular straw that made me want to never be posted back into ADM(Mat) ever, as it was just so stupid with zero value added. I'd kind of love to shift over to an auditor job for a bit to look at things like this to see what impact the significant delays had on actual outcomes, and what the real costs to delaying the project were. In this case, it was probably $3-4M for a project worth about $30-35M (depending on some inflation, wear and tear and maintenance projections).
 
I've done that before with a CO's approval for a twice daily message, we just included a note in one that we would consolidate the twice daily update to the morning one. No one noticed for about 5 weeks at CJOC, but they also had no idea we were sitting off the coast of Syria within range of their shore battery and about a mile away from the Russian carrier doing bombing runs on locals, and thought we were on a NATO booze cruise so that victory felt a bit hollow. Still, one less daily message to generate was a plus!

In this particular case we needed approval to go to the next round of SBCA (directors at CAF, PSPC and ISED to DGs at each) so that wasn't an option, and the whole thing was a mandatory approval gate (with 4 or 5 sub gates) to move onto RFP release, which still actually hasn't happened. It's just to buy some COTs gear, that meets a commercial standard, and then maintain it, for possibly it's lifespan (15 years) with options for a bit of maintainer training etc, so actually really straight forward.

This may have been the particular straw that made me want to never be posted back into ADM(Mat) ever, as it was just so stupid with zero value added. I'd kind of love to shift over to an auditor job for a bit to look at things like this to see what impact the significant delays had on actual outcomes, and what the real costs to delaying the project were. In this case, it was probably $3-4M for a project worth about $30-35M (depending on some inflation, wear and tear and maintenance projections).

My favorite project was where we asked a group of accountants to print off paper copies of all the reports that they had to produce for executive, tape them to the wall in a big meeting room, then put coloured dots on them indicating frequency (daily, weekly, monthly etc).

They covered two big walls with dozens of reports, most of them 'very frequent' e.g., weekly or sooner.

We then walked the executive team into the room. One of them cried a little when they saw what they were doing to their staff.

That gave me hope ;)
 
My favorite project was where we asked a group of accountants to print off paper copies of all the reports that they had to produce for executive, tape them to the wall in a big meeting room, then put coloured dots on them indicating frequency (daily, weekly, monthly etc).

They covered two big walls with dozens of reports, most of them 'very frequent' e.g., weekly or sooner.

We then walked the executive team into the room. One of them cried a little when they saw what they were doing to their staff.

That gave me hope ;)
It's the one's who start giggling that worry me.
 
TBS and PCO both being in the top ten, percentage wise, gives street cred to the centrals.
 

Overall it looks like about a 10% reduction which, in the great scheme of things, doesn't seem that big of a hit..

... and 'Wave 3' starts tomorrow...


Core public administration reductions from the Comprehensive Expenditure Review

This data was last updated on January 30, 2026.

This table provides data on workforce reductions in the CPA, which are being implemented in phases. Information for certain departments is not yet presented as these institutions are still finalizing the implementation of their reductions. This data will be updated on a regular basis as these phases are completed and as additional information becomes available.

Similar data for separate agencies will be available in the coming weeks.

 
Yeah, from about a total of 1700 employees or so.

So from what I can see this is only core public admin departments.
Is there a breakdown on the percentages of senior management vs. those office manager and below.
 
Is there a breakdown on the percentages of senior management vs. those office manager and below.
I didn’t see that exact breakdown.


This article breaks it down though by numbers.
 
I didn’t see that exact breakdown.


This article breaks it down though by numbers.
Thanks for that. I don't know how top heavy they are in management but it isn't an unfair ratio. Gotta hurt though because many of the departments work on a last in first out basis so a lot of those going will be the ones you want there in 15 years.
 
Thanks for that. I don't know how top heavy they are in management but it isn't an unfair ratio. Gotta hurt though because many of the departments work on a last in first out basis so a lot of those going will be the ones you want there in 15 years.
Some are very top heavy with executives. Lots where I am at and they have been warned that some will be WFAed. Hasn’t happened yet though but it’s coming I think,
 
Back
Top