- Reaction score
- 12,522
- Points
- 1,360
Here's a viable career option no one ever acknowledges
David Sovka: Why quiet quitting is better than starting a new career
Starting a new career requires you to pretend you have a lot more enthusiasm than aspirin and scotch provides, and also to lie theatrically on a newly made-up résumé.
Today, strategic human resource professionals have to be on the lookout for employees who engage in a relatively new workplace trend called “quiet quitting.”
This is when employees only do the minimum requirements of their jobs, without working unpaid overtime or going above and beyond like we all did in the 1990s. Remember the 1990s, when AI was just a made-up threat in science-fiction movies, not a real threat to people’s jobs and the economy? I’M JUST ASKING QUESTIONS.
Practitioners of quiet quitting say they are setting boundaries to prevent burnout and combat “hustle culture,” which is the belief that relentless work, long hours and prioritizing professional achievement is worth it, despite all evidence to the contrary.
Sometimes it’s described as “acting your wage,” and sometimes as “acting like dirty commies,” depending on your perspective.
I would like to recommend quiet quitting over starting a new career, which requires you to pretend you have a lot more enthusiasm than aspirin and scotch provides, and also to lie theatrically on a newly made-up résumé.
I have been quiet quitting for years. This comes out in various ways, such as giggling when my manager says: “I want you to own your projects,” and never walking all the way to the staff washroom when Colin’s office plant is right there, looking thirsty.
This!I don't see the issue. If employers want more, then pay more.
I've lived this now a few times. Putting in a high level of discretionary effort is a recipe for getting taken advantage of. You end up becoming the fallback guy for every issue and instead of fixing the mechanism or process, they just call you.
It also prevents you from advancing your career because you become TOO GOOD at your job. I had this happen in my last position. I actually was blocked from moving to another department for a higher range position that I had interviewed for because my department wouldn't allow me to be released for operational reasons.
I was warned about this by some colleagues who said "they are never going to let you leave, you're too skilled at the job and it would be easier for you to quit and apply six month later than it would be for you to lateral".
I ended up doing a lateral a year later after a very matter of fact conversation with upper management and secured a far larger compensation package, but I am doing the same role, just getting paid way more. I also get more time off.
The private sector isn't like the public sector or military. Compensation packages are individually negotiated. You could have people in the same office doing the exact same jobs with the exact same title and one person makes $50,000 more than the other guy next to them.
