• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]

army

Guest
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
50
Posted by Jonathan Steeves <[email protected]> on 31 Dec 00 18:40:23 CST
Since the disbanding of the CAR, the Queen‘s Own Rifle‘s have carried the
duty, as a para regiment for canada, even wearing the maroon beret. So why
look any wheres else? Perhaps you‘re better off staying in Canada. Am i
right or am i right!!!!
[email protected] wrote:
I think I‘m shootin‘ pretty high, now.
All I was trying to do was make some sense of our situation now.
Look at the roles Canada has played in all the major wars since our Country‘s
conception. We‘ve fought so gallantly in all of the wars, for our Country and
Queen, and now it seems as though we wouldn‘t be able to do much at all. The
one thing that makes me feel a little better about it, is knowing the state
of the Forces before WWII.
>From what I understand, the forces were pretty much non existent. Would we be
able to do that again?
If Canada had a Parachute Batallion, or if the CAR was still around, I‘d be
very satisfied here. But now, I think I‘m going to end up in Britain with
the Paras. Nothing‘s for sure, but that‘s where I think I‘m going to head.
I‘m a very, very proud Canadian, but it seems the Para‘s offer so much more,
and in the end, it‘s all for the same Queen, and commonwealth, so.....
I‘d love to stay in Canada, but if that‘s going to stop me from enjoying my
military career, I don‘t think I‘ll stick around.
Who knows.
I‘d love some more comments regarding my original comments about a Parachute
Batallion, though!
Please, if you‘ve got something to say, really, I‘d love to hear it!
-Matt B.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
____________________________________________________________________
Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Peter deVries" <[email protected]> on Mon, 01 Jan 2001 01:38:54
The Queens Own Rifles is not the Canadian Airborne Regiment, it is a reserve
regiment that was granted the right to have an Para Platoon or company or
something. I‘m not saying that anyone should join a foriegn army. But the
CAR and the Queens Own Rifles are different.
Peter
>From: Jonathan Steeves
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: 31 Dec 00 18:40:23 CST
>
>Since the disbanding of the CAR, the Queen‘s Own Rifle‘s have carried the
>duty, as a para regiment for canada, even wearing the maroon beret. So why
>look any wheres else? Perhaps you‘re better off staying in Canada. Am i
>right or am i right!!!!
>
>
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>I think I‘m shootin‘ pretty high, now.
>All I was trying to do was make some sense of our situation now.
>Look at the roles Canada has played in all the major wars since our
>Country‘s
>
>conception. We‘ve fought so gallantly in all of the wars, for our Country
>and
>
>Queen, and now it seems as though we wouldn‘t be able to do much at all.
>The
>one thing that makes me feel a little better about it, is knowing the state
>of the Forces before WWII.
>From what I understand, the forces were pretty much non existent. Would we
>be
>
>able to do that again?
>If Canada had a Parachute Batallion, or if the CAR was still around, I‘d be
>very satisfied here. But now, I think I‘m going to end up in Britain with
>the Paras. Nothing‘s for sure, but that‘s where I think I‘m going to head.
>I‘m a very, very proud Canadian, but it seems the Para‘s offer so much
>more,
>and in the end, it‘s all for the same Queen, and commonwealth, so.....
>I‘d love to stay in Canada, but if that‘s going to stop me from enjoying my
>military career, I don‘t think I‘ll stick around.
>Who knows.
>I‘d love some more comments regarding my original comments about a
>Parachute
>Batallion, though!
>Please, if you‘ve got something to say, really, I‘d love to hear it!
> -Matt B.
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________
>Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by Jean-F Menicucci <[email protected]> on Mon, 01 Jan 2001 02:21:05 -0500
The QOR has an unit that does "Para", but they are far from the CAR, well REALLY
far, not even the same.
Well Mat, Good luck in the UK :o
Jonathan Steeves wrote:
> Since the disbanding of the CAR, the Queen‘s Own Rifle‘s have carried the
> duty, as a para regiment for canada, even wearing the maroon beret. So why
> look any wheres else? Perhaps you‘re better off staying in Canada. Am i
> right or am i right!!!!
>
> [email protected] wrote:
> I think I‘m shootin‘ pretty high, now.
> All I was trying to do was make some sense of our situation now.
> Look at the roles Canada has played in all the major wars since our Country‘s
>
> conception. We‘ve fought so gallantly in all of the wars, for our Country and
>
> Queen, and now it seems as though we wouldn‘t be able to do much at all. The
> one thing that makes me feel a little better about it, is knowing the state
> of the Forces before WWII.
> >From what I understand, the forces were pretty much non existent. Would we be
>
> able to do that again?
> If Canada had a Parachute Batallion, or if the CAR was still around, I‘d be
> very satisfied here. But now, I think I‘m going to end up in Britain with
> the Paras. Nothing‘s for sure, but that‘s where I think I‘m going to head.
> I‘m a very, very proud Canadian, but it seems the Para‘s offer so much more,
> and in the end, it‘s all for the same Queen, and commonwealth, so.....
> I‘d love to stay in Canada, but if that‘s going to stop me from enjoying my
> military career, I don‘t think I‘ll stick around.
> Who knows.
> I‘d love some more comments regarding my original comments about a Parachute
> Batallion, though!
> Please, if you‘ve got something to say, really, I‘d love to hear it!
> -Matt B.
> --------------------------------------------------------
> NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> to [email protected] from the account you wish to
> remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
> message body.
>
> ____________________________________________________________________
> Get free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N
> --------------------------------------------------------
> NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> to [email protected] from the account you wish to
> remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
> message body.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Nick Butler" <[email protected]> on Mon, 01 Jan 2001 14:56:48 -0500
Well, you‘re not quite right. I was going to join the QOR originally before I joined the Hasty P‘s, and I can tell you this about them. First off, they do have airborne tasking, most of their members are jump-qualified. They do indeed wear maroon berets to reflect this, and in the official order of battle they are an airborne unit. However, they are still a PRes unit, though not an average one. Someone wishing to join the QOR, from what I learned, must first pass the CF‘s standards, but then must meet the QOR‘s much more demanding requirements before being badged into the unit. They consider themselves quite an elite club.
They‘re no replacement for the CAR though.
N.
gtFrom: Jonathan Steeves
gtReply-To: [email protected]
gtTo: [email protected]
gtSubject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
gtDate: 31 Dec 00 18:40:23 CST
gt
gtSince the disbanding of the CAR, the Queen‘s Own Rifle‘s have carried the
gtduty, as a para regiment for canada, even wearing the maroon beret. So why
gtlook any wheres else? Perhaps you‘re better off staying in Canada. Am i
gtright or am i right!!!!
gt
gt
gt
[email protected] wrote:
gtI think I‘m shootin‘ pretty high, now.
gtAll I was trying to do was make some sense of our situation now.
gtLook at the roles Canada has played in all the major wars since our Country‘s
gt
gtconception. We‘ve fought so gallantly in all of the wars, for our Country and
gt
gtQueen, and now it seems as though we wouldn‘t be able to do much at all. The
gtone thing that makes me feel a little better about it, is knowing the state
gtof the Forces before WWII.
gtFrom what I understand, the forces were pretty much non existent. Would we be
gt
gtable to do that again?
gtIf Canada had a Parachute Batallion, or if the CAR was still around, I‘d be
gtvery satisfied here. But now, I think I‘m going to end up in Britain with
gtthe Paras. Nothing‘s for sure, but that‘s where I think I‘m going to head.
gtI‘m a very, very proud Canadian, but it seems the Para‘s offer so much more,
gtand in the end, it‘s all for the same Queen, and commonwealth, so.....
gtI‘d love to stay in Canada, but if that‘s going to stop me from enjoying my
gtmilitary career, I don‘t think I‘ll stick around.
gtWho knows.
gtI‘d love some more comments regarding my original comments about a Parachute
gtBatallion, though!
gtPlease, if you‘ve got something to say, really, I‘d love to hear it!
gt -Matt B.
gt--------------------------------------------------------
gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
gtto [email protected] from the account you wish to
gtremove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
gtmessage body.
gt
gt
gt____________________________________________________________________
gtGet free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
gt--------------------------------------------------------
gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
gtto [email protected] from the account you wish to
gtremove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
gtmessage body.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Ian Edwards" <[email protected]> on Mon, 1 Jan 2001 13:58:07 -0700
Way back in 1972 the LEdmnR, Les Voltigeurs de Quebec and the QOR were
all given airborne augmentation taskings.
Subsequent to the disbandment of Cdn Abn Regt the taskings were removed
from all but the QOR. The QOR an elite unit?
Well, I would expect that the 48th Highrs, Tor Scot R, RRofC just in
Toronto would have reasons to disagree and feel that it‘s not all that
difficult to abandon a perfectly servicable aircraft in mid flight. All
regiments have reason to believe they are elite.
If not they might just as well all put up the general service badge and
do away with the trappings of regimental pride. And likely, only a
portion of the QOR are tasked as airborne - one pl or one coy - with
other sub units tasked as Poor Bloody Infantry.
----- Original Message -----
From: Nick Butler
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 12:56 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
Well, you‘re not quite right. I was going to join the QOR originally
before I joined the Hasty P‘s, and I can tell you this about them.
First off, they do have airborne tasking, most of their members are
jump-qualified. They do indeed wear maroon berets to reflect this, and
in the official order of battle they are an airborne unit. However,
they are still a PRes unit, though not an average one. Someone wishing
to join the QOR, from what I learned, must first pass the CF‘s
standards, but then must meet the QOR‘s much more demanding requirements
before being badged into the unit. They consider themselves quite an
elite club.
They‘re no replacement for the CAR though.
N.
>From: Jonathan Steeves
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: 31 Dec 00 18:40:23 CST
>
>Since the disbanding of the CAR, the Queen‘s Own Rifle‘s have carried
the
>duty, as a para regiment for canada, even wearing the maroon beret.
So why
>look any wheres else? Perhaps you‘re better off staying in Canada. Am
i
>right or am i right!!!!
>
>
>
>[email protected] wrote:
>I think I‘m shootin‘ pretty high, now.
>All I was trying to do was make some sense of our situation now.
>Look at the roles Canada has played in all the major wars since our
Country‘s
>
>conception. We‘ve fought so gallantly in all of the wars, for our
Country and
>
>Queen, and now it seems as though we wouldn‘t be able to do much at
all. The
>one thing that makes me feel a little better about it, is knowing the
state
>of the Forces before WWII.
>From what I understand, the forces were pretty much non existent.
Would we be
>
>able to do that again?
>If Canada had a Parachute Batallion, or if the CAR was still around,
I‘d be
>very satisfied here. But now, I think I‘m going to end up in Britain
with
>the Paras. Nothing‘s for sure, but that‘s where I think I‘m going to
head.
>I‘m a very, very proud Canadian, but it seems the Para‘s offer so
much more,
>and in the end, it‘s all for the same Queen, and commonwealth,
so.....
>I‘d love to stay in Canada, but if that‘s going to stop me from
enjoying my
>military career, I don‘t think I‘ll stick around.
>Who knows.
>I‘d love some more comments regarding my original comments about a
Parachute
>Batallion, though!
>Please, if you‘ve got something to say, really, I‘d love to hear it!
> -Matt B.
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
>
>
>____________________________________________________________________
>Get free email and a permanent address at
http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D1
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
-----
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at
http://www.hotmail.com.
-------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: To
remove yourself from this list, send a message to [email protected]
from the account you wish to remove, with the line "unsubscribe
army-list" in the message body.
http-equiv=3DContent-Type>
Way back in 1972 the LEdmnR, Les
Voltigeurs de
Quebec and the QOR were all given airborne augmentation
taskings.
Subsequent to the disbandment of Cdn
Abn Regt the
taskings were removed from all but the QOR. The QOR an elite
unit?
Well, I would expect that the 48th
Highrs, Tor Scot
R, RRofC just in Toronto would have reasons to disagree and feel that
it‘s not
all that difficult to abandon a perfectly servicable aircraft in mid
flight. All
regiments have reason to believe they are elite.
If not they might just as well all put
up the
general service badge and do away with the trappings of regimental
pride. And
likely, only a portion of the QOR are tasked as airborne - one pl or one
coy -
with other sub units tasked as Poor Bloody Infantry.
----- Original Message -----
From:
Nick
Butler
To: [email protected]
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001
12:56
PM
Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute
Batallion?]


Well, you‘re not quite right. I was going to join the QOR
originally
before I joined the Hasty P‘s, and I can tell you this about
them. First
off, they do have airborne tasking, most of their members are
jump-qualified. They do indeed wear maroon berets to reflect
this, and
in the official order of battle they are an airborne unit.
However, they
are still a PRes unit, though not an average one. Someone
wishing to
join the QOR, from what I learned, must first pass the CF‘s standards,
but
then must meet the QOR‘s much more demanding requirements before being
badged
into the unit. They consider themselves quite an elite club.
They‘re no replacement for the CAR though.
N.

gtFrom: Jonathan Steeves
gtReply-To: [email protected]
gtTo: [email protected]
gtSubject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
gtDate: 31 Dec 00 18:40:23 CST
gt
gtSince the disbanding of the CAR, the Queen‘s Own
Rifle‘s have
carried the
gtduty, as a para regiment for canada, even wearing the
maroon
beret. So why
gtlook any wheres else? Perhaps you‘re better off staying
in
Canada. Am i
gtright or am i right!!!!
gt
gt
gt
[email protected] wrote:
gtI think I‘m shootin‘ pretty high, now.
gtAll I was trying to do was make some sense of our
situation
now.
gtLook at the roles Canada has played in all the major
wars since
our Country‘s
gt
gtconception. We‘ve fought so gallantly in all of the
wars, for
our Country and
gt
gtQueen, and now it seems as though we wouldn‘t be able
to do
much at all. The
gtone thing that makes me feel a little better about it,
is
knowing the state
gtof the Forces before WWII.
gtFrom what I understand, the forces were pretty much non
existent. Would we be
gt
gtable to do that again?
gtIf Canada had a Parachute Batallion, or if the CAR was
still
around, I‘d be
gtvery satisfied here. But now, I think I‘m going to end
up in
Britain with
gtthe Paras. Nothing‘s for sure, but that‘s where I think
I‘m
going to head.
gtI‘m a very, very proud Canadian, but it seems the
Para‘s offer
so much more,
gtand in the end, it‘s all for the same Queen, and
commonwealth,
so.....
gtI‘d love to stay in Canada, but if that‘s going to stop
me from
enjoying my
gtmilitary career, I don‘t think I‘ll stick around.
gtWho knows.
gtI‘d love some more comments regarding my original
comments
about a Parachute
gtBatallion, though!
gtPlease, if you‘ve got something to say, really, I‘d
love to
hear it!
gt -Matt B.

gt--------------------------------------------------------
gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
gtto [email protected] from the account you wish to
gtremove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
gtmessage body.
gt
gt

gt__________________________________________________________
__________
gtGet free email and a permanent address at
http://www.netaddress.com/?N=3D1

gt--------------------------------------------------------
gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
gtto [email protected] from the account you wish to
gtremove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
gtmessage body.


Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
-------------------------------------------------------- NOTE:
To
remove yourself from this list, send a message to [email protected]
from
the account you wish to remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list"
in the
message body.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Nick Butler" <[email protected]> on Mon, 01 Jan 2001 16:16:05 -0500
Note that I said they consider "themselves" an elite club... It was interesting in my experience though it was the observation of one afternoon to watch the 48th Highlanders and the QOR subtlely show their rivalry, just among the few that were there back in the summer when I went to Moss Park to look into joining in the first place. Such rivalry, of course, IMH and inexperiencd O is important, as it gives everyone more cause to do a better job of everything.
According to the QOR‘s webage www.qor.com they have 66 jump-tasked personnel in a cadre company, but they are not a purely airborne regiment, you are correct.
gtFrom: "Ian Edwards"
gtReply-To: [email protected]
gtTo:
gtSubject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
gtDate: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 13:58:07 -0700
gt
gtWay back in 1972 the LEdmnR, Les Voltigeurs de Quebec and the QOR were all given airborne augmentation taskings.
gtSubsequent to the disbandment of Cdn Abn Regt the taskings were removed from all but the QOR. The QOR an elite unit?
gtWell, I would expect that the 48th Highrs, Tor Scot R, RRofC just in Toronto would have reasons to disagree and feel that it‘s not all that difficult to abandon a perfectly servicable aircraft in mid flight. All regiments have reason to believe they are elite.
gtIf not they might just as well all put up the general service badge and do away with the trappings of regimental pride. And likely, only a portion of the QOR are tasked as airborne - one pl or one coy - with other sub units tasked as Poor Bloody Infantry.
gt ----- Original Message -----
gt From: Nick Butler
gt To: [email protected]
gt Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 12:56 PM
gt Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
gt
gt
gt Well, you‘re not quite right. I was going to join the QOR originally before I joined the Hasty P‘s, and I can tell you this about them. First off, they do have airborne tasking, most of their members are jump-qualified. They do indeed wear maroon berets to reflect this, and in the official order of battle they are an airborne unit. However, they are still a PRes unit, though not an average one. Someone wishing to join the QOR, from what I learned, must first pass the CF‘s standards, but then must meet the QOR‘s much more demanding requirements before being badged into the unit. They consider themselves quite an elite club.
gt
gt They‘re no replacement for the CAR though.
gt
gt N.
gt
gt
gt
gt gtFrom: Jonathan Steeves
gt gtReply-To: [email protected]
gt gtTo: [email protected]
gt gtSubject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
gt gtDate: 31 Dec 00 18:40:23 CST
gt gt
gt gtSince the disbanding of the CAR, the Queen‘s Own Rifle‘s have carried the
gt gtduty, as a para regiment for canada, even wearing the maroon beret. So why
gt gtlook any wheres else? Perhaps you‘re better off staying in Canada. Am i
gt gtright or am i right!!!!
gt gt
gt gt
gt gt
gt [email protected] wrote:
gt gtI think I‘m shootin‘ pretty high, now.
gt gtAll I was trying to do was make some sense of our situation now.
gt gtLook at the roles Canada has played in all the major wars since our Country‘s
gt gt
gt gtconception. We‘ve fought so gallantly in all of the wars, for our Country and
gt gt
gt gtQueen, and now it seems as though we wouldn‘t be able to do much at all. The
gt gtone thing that makes me feel a little better about it, is knowing the state
gt gtof the Forces before WWII.
gt gtFrom what I understand, the forces were pretty much non existent. Would we be
gt gt
gt gtable to do that again?
gt gtIf Canada had a Parachute Batallion, or if the CAR was still around, I‘d be
gt gtvery satisfied here. But now, I think I‘m going to end up in Britain with
gt gtthe Paras. Nothing‘s for sure, but that‘s where I think I‘m going to head.
gt gtI‘m a very, very proud Canadian, but it seems the Para‘s offer so much more,
gt gtand in the end, it‘s all for the same Queen, and commonwealth, so.....
gt gtI‘d love to stay in Canada, but if that‘s going to stop me from enjoying my
gt gtmilitary career, I don‘t think I‘ll stick around.
gt gtWho knows.
gt gtI‘d love some more comments regarding my original comments about a Parachute
gt gtBatallion, though!
gt gtPlease, if you‘ve got something to say, really, I‘d love to hear it!
gt gt -Matt B.
gt gt--------------------------------------------------------
gt gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
gt gtto [email protected] from the account you wish to
gt gtremove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
gt gtmessage body.
gt gt
gt gt
gt gt____________________________________________________________________
gt gtGet free email and a permanent address at http://www.netaddress.com/?N=1
gt gt--------------------------------------------------------
gt gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
gt gtto [email protected] from the account you wish to
gt gtremove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
gt gtmessage body.
gt
gt
gt------------------------------------------------------------------------------
gt Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
gt
gt
gt -------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message to [email protected] from the account you wish to remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the message body.
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by [email protected] on Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:34:32 EST
So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near future? I
wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur with
that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an Airborne
Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to the
UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
Let‘s have it.
-Matt B.

--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Peter deVries" <[email protected]> on Tue, 02 Jan 2001 01:02:01
Matt,
Why would you want to join a foriegn army? It seems like a lot just to
wear a maroon beret. Sure I would love to be airborne, but I wouldn‘t leave
my country just to be a paratrooper. If I was to go to the U.K. I would join
the Black Watch. But I would rather want to work for Canada than anywhere
else. You can still be part of a jump coy in one of the infantry regiments.
It‘s not the same as the old Airborne, but then again, the British Para‘s
are not the same as the CAR. The British Paras are humbled because of all
the other "Special Forces units" in Britain. IE:SAS, SBS, Royal Marine
Commando‘s, etc... If you want to be an unconventional soldier, join the
Canadian army, we are one of the most unconventional armies in the world, I
don‘t think in any other army, does the ordinary soldier play so many roles.
Also, we have JTF-2 which is open to both reservists and regular force
soldiers. Anyway, something to think about. I would say that the Canadian
soldier is thought to be one of the best, most versitile soldiers in the
world.
But, it is up to you, make sure you educate yourself on both armies before
you join either one.
Peter
>From: [email protected]
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:34:32 EST
>
>So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
>Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near future?
>I
>wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
>modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
>inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur
>with
>that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an
>Airborne
>Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
> Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to
>the
>UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
> Let‘s have it.
> -Matt B.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Adam Wainwright" <[email protected]> on Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:45:25 -0800
Peter,
I understand where Matt is coming from though. I to am seriously looking
into going to the UK to the royal marines. There are something‘s about my
situation that are frustrating, I want to be an officer and being form the
west coast have a definite disadvantage to eastern Canadian candidates. It
seems that Canada is very much cantered in the east or what is east to us.
Which it is, life here is totally different from there. Still I‘m not
saying that the CF in anyway does not accommodate us it just seems that were
out of the game out here sometimes. I see Matts want to go somewhere else.
We as a country don‘t really have any ‘big name units‘. Plus there are some
super postings and kit in the UK. Also the mentality is totally different -
the brits have fought a war everyday for the last 500 years. The are
scrappers and train to actually fight and be fighting soldiers. they really
don‘t mess around. there PT and stuff is crazy.
Sorry if anyone takes offence to this opion.
Adam
-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] [mailto:o[email protected]]On
Behalf Of Peter deVries
Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 1:02 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
Matt,
Why would you want to join a foriegn army? It seems like a lot just to
wear a maroon beret. Sure I would love to be airborne, but I wouldn‘t leave
my country just to be a paratrooper. If I was to go to the U.K. I would join
the Black Watch. But I would rather want to work for Canada than anywhere
else. You can still be part of a jump coy in one of the infantry regiments.
It‘s not the same as the old Airborne, but then again, the British Para‘s
are not the same as the CAR. The British Paras are humbled because of all
the other "Special Forces units" in Britain. IE:SAS, SBS, Royal Marine
Commando‘s, etc... If you want to be an unconventional soldier, join the
Canadian army, we are one of the most unconventional armies in the world, I
don‘t think in any other army, does the ordinary soldier play so many roles.
Also, we have JTF-2 which is open to both reservists and regular force
soldiers. Anyway, something to think about. I would say that the Canadian
soldier is thought to be one of the best, most versitile soldiers in the
world.
But, it is up to you, make sure you educate yourself on both armies before
you join either one.
Peter
>From: [email protected]
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:34:32 EST
>
>So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
>Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near future?
>I
>wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
>modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
>inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur
>with
>that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an
>Airborne
>Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
> Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to
>the
>UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
> Let‘s have it.
> -Matt B.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Gow" <[email protected]> on Mon, 1 Jan 2001 21:10:29 -0500
Matt
It would be:
a Poor allocation of scarce funds. As Mike pointed out, we can train a
battalion how to jump in literally days or weeks we will of course
maintain the schooling for SAR specialists etc
b Our army is undersized, and today‘s thinking seems to be that we will
trend away from career full time soldiers and instead use the PRes more
effectively and widely done it before, post WWI. I cannot see where its
format wants or needs an Airborne unit.
c Our aerial assets are at best limited. Supporting an airborne
battalion costs a lot and this could be better used in simply accomplishing
our national taskings of peace keeping, internal economies of the Forces
themselves and limiting the wear and tear on them generally.
Now without ruffling feathers too badly, for some of you, you guys had
better sort it out inside your heads what being a soldier means. Theres
enough things in the job that can be enjoyed without having to jump off the
cliff about an Airborne unit employing you for a few years of your career.
And if you‘re that anxious to be an Airborne Ranger that you‘ll hop into the
uniform of a country of convenience, doesn‘t that make you a mercenary? No
ideals, beliefs or people you serve or protect no attention to national
policy or beliefs, just going out and doing this for your ego....
Better give your heads a shake guys...
John
----- Original Message -----
From:
To:
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 6:34 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
> So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
> Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near future?
I
> wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
> modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
> inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur
with
> that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an
Airborne
> Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
> Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to
the
> UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
> Let‘s have it.
> -Matt B.
>
> --------------------------------------------------------
> NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> to [email protected] from the account you wish to
> remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
> message body.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Peter deVries" <[email protected]> on Tue, 02 Jan 2001 02:31:30
Adam,
I come from Nova Scotia, and it is just as hard to get into the military
college out here. The thoughts are exactly the same here "That everything
west of us gets everything" I don‘t think that Canada is biast to the east.
The RCR, the PPCLI, and the VanDoos are all well known regiments outside
Canada. And yes the British have been fighting for a while, but you have to
consider this: I don‘t think any Soldier wants war. Sure the training is
interesting and I would be the first one to volunteer for a tour, but war is
not something to wish for. Sure the British have good kit, but the Canadian
forces are just getting re-kitted. Anyway, In my opinion, I can‘t understand
why anyone would want to join a foreign army.
Peter
>From: "Adam Wainwright"
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To:
>Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:45:25 -0800
>
>Peter,
>I understand where Matt is coming from though. I to am seriously looking
>into going to the UK to the royal marines. There are something‘s about my
>situation that are frustrating, I want to be an officer and being form the
>west coast have a definite disadvantage to eastern Canadian candidates. It
>seems that Canada is very much cantered in the east or what is east to
>us.
>Which it is, life here is totally different from there. Still I‘m not
>saying that the CF in anyway does not accommodate us it just seems that
>were
>out of the game out here sometimes. I see Matts want to go somewhere else.
>We as a country don‘t really have any ‘big name units‘. Plus there are
>some
>super postings and kit in the UK. Also the mentality is totally different
>-
>the brits have fought a war everyday for the last 500 years. The are
>scrappers and train to actually fight and be fighting soldiers. they really
>don‘t mess around. there PT and stuff is crazy.
>Sorry if anyone takes offence to this opion.
>
>Adam
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:o[email protected]]On
>Behalf Of Peter deVries
>Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 1:02 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>
>
>Matt,
> Why would you want to join a foriegn army? It seems like a lot just to
>wear a maroon beret. Sure I would love to be airborne, but I wouldn‘t leave
>my country just to be a paratrooper. If I was to go to the U.K. I would
>join
>the Black Watch. But I would rather want to work for Canada than anywhere
>else. You can still be part of a jump coy in one of the infantry regiments.
>It‘s not the same as the old Airborne, but then again, the British Para‘s
>are not the same as the CAR. The British Paras are humbled because of all
>the other "Special Forces units" in Britain. IE:SAS, SBS, Royal Marine
>Commando‘s, etc... If you want to be an unconventional soldier, join the
>Canadian army, we are one of the most unconventional armies in the world, I
>don‘t think in any other army, does the ordinary soldier play so many
>roles.
>Also, we have JTF-2 which is open to both reservists and regular force
>soldiers. Anyway, something to think about. I would say that the Canadian
>soldier is thought to be one of the best, most versitile soldiers in the
>world.
>But, it is up to you, make sure you educate yourself on both armies before
>you join either one.
>Peter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: [email protected]
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
> >Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:34:32 EST
> >
> >So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
> >Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near
>future?
> >I
> >wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
> >modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
> >inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur
> >with
> >that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an
> >Airborne
> >Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
> > Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to
> >the
> >UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
> > Let‘s have it.
> > -Matt B.
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------
> >NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> >to [email protected] from the account you wish to
> >remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
> >message body.
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Peter deVries" <[email protected]> on Tue, 02 Jan 2001 02:34:14
I agree 100 John.
Peter
>From: "Gow"
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To:
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 21:10:29 -0500
>
>Matt
>
>It would be:
>
>a Poor allocation of scarce funds. As Mike pointed out, we can train a
>battalion how to jump in literally days or weeks we will of course
>maintain the schooling for SAR specialists etc
>b Our army is undersized, and today‘s thinking seems to be that we will
>trend away from career full time soldiers and instead use the PRes more
>effectively and widely done it before, post WWI. I cannot see where its
>format wants or needs an Airborne unit.
>c Our aerial assets are at best limited. Supporting an airborne
>battalion costs a lot and this could be better used in simply accomplishing
>our national taskings of peace keeping, internal economies of the Forces
>themselves and limiting the wear and tear on them generally.
>
>Now without ruffling feathers too badly, for some of you, you guys had
>better sort it out inside your heads what being a soldier means. Theres
>enough things in the job that can be enjoyed without having to jump off the
>cliff about an Airborne unit employing you for a few years of your career.
>
>And if you‘re that anxious to be an Airborne Ranger that you‘ll hop into
>the
>uniform of a country of convenience, doesn‘t that make you a mercenary? No
>ideals, beliefs or people you serve or protect no attention to national
>policy or beliefs, just going out and doing this for your ego....
>
>Better give your heads a shake guys...
>
>John
>----- Original Message -----
>From:
>To:
>Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 6:34 PM
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>
>
> > So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
> > Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near
>future?
>I
> > wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
> > modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
> > inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur
>with
> > that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an
>Airborne
> > Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
> > Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to
>the
> > UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
> > Let‘s have it.
> > -Matt B.
> >
> > --------------------------------------------------------
> > NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> > to [email protected] from the account you wish to
> > remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
> > message body.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "The MacFarlanes‘" <[email protected]> on Tue, 2 Jan 2001 06:38:21 -0700
I agree. For you other guys, if you insist, don‘t forget the French Foreign
Legion
MacF
0000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000
"The older I grow, the more I listen to people who don‘t say much."
--Germain G. Glidden
----- Original Message -----
From: "Gow"
To:
Sent: Monday, January 01, 2001 7:10 PM
Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>
> Now without ruffling feathers too badly, for some of you, you guys had
> better sort it out inside your heads what being a soldier means. Theres
> enough things in the job that can be enjoyed without having to jump off
the
> cliff about an Airborne unit employing you for a few years of your career.
>
> And if you‘re that anxious to be an Airborne Ranger that you‘ll hop into
the
> uniform of a country of convenience, doesn‘t that make you a mercenary?
No
> ideals, beliefs or people you serve or protect no attention to national
> policy or beliefs, just going out and doing this for your ego....
>
> Better give your heads a shake guys...
>
> John
> > > NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> > to [email protected] from the account you wish to
> > remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
> > message body.
>
>
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Joan O. Arc" <[email protected]> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:47:27 -0000
More belated input If no one else wants o revisit these subjects, which
have probably already been thoroughly covered on the BB, I quite understand,
but am only now doing a post-holiday catch up on e-mails!
Re: "I don‘t think any Soldier wants war."
I‘m picking up two quite different strains of thought on this question from
this list. Those, such as Peter, who seem to see military service primarily
as a form to service to country and who are willing to do "whatever the job
takes" during the period in which they happen to serve. If war, fine if
not, that‘s OK, too.
But there are others who seem so keen on the idea that soldiering = fighting
that they‘re willing to join other countries‘ services if it will increase
their chances of fighting.
I guess my question is: How do the majority of the members of this list who
have served/are serving/hope to serve feel about what seems to me this
fairly fundamental philosophical question?
The reason I ask is that the other day I was talking to someone who has
written fairly extensively about and made quite a few documentaries about
Generally positive ones, I hasten to add. Like me, he is a civvie
"military buff". the Cdn. Armed Forces
He commented that, based on what he has seen, anyway, he thinks that
peacekeeping may be an inherently demoralizing job for many soldiers,
because the sort of person who seeks a career in the miltary is generally
someone who wants an opportunity to fight, not to "sit around" figurative
speech - NOT meant to disparage the p‘keepers efforts in any way
preventing others from fighting.
I realize this is not a particularly new observation, but it does strike me
as a potentially important one.
Again, I wonder what the views of the members of this list on this question
might be?
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Peter deVries"
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 02:31:30
Adam,
I come from Nova Scotia, and it is just as hard to get into the military
college out here. The thoughts are exactly the same here "That everything
west of us gets everything" I don‘t think that Canada is biast to the east.
The RCR, the PPCLI, and the VanDoos are all well known regiments outside
Canada. And yes the British have been fighting for a while, but you have to
consider this: I don‘t think any Soldier wants war. Sure the training is
interesting and I would be the first one to volunteer for a tour, but war is
not something to wish for. Sure the British have good kit, but the Canadian
forces are just getting re-kitted. Anyway, In my opinion, I can‘t understand
why anyone would want to join a foreign army.
Peter
>From: "Adam Wainwright"
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To:
>Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:45:25 -0800
>
>Peter,
>I understand where Matt is coming from though. I to am seriously looking
>into going to the UK to the royal marines. There are something‘s about my
>situation that are frustrating, I want to be an officer and being form the
>west coast have a definite disadvantage to eastern Canadian candidates. It
>seems that Canada is very much cantered in the east or what is east to
>us.
>Which it is, life here is totally different from there. Still I‘m not
>saying that the CF in anyway does not accommodate us it just seems that
>were
>out of the game out here sometimes. I see Matts want to go somewhere else.
>We as a country don‘t really have any ‘big name units‘. Plus there are
>some
>super postings and kit in the UK. Also the mentality is totally different
>-
>the brits have fought a war everyday for the last 500 years. The are
>scrappers and train to actually fight and be fighting soldiers. they really
>don‘t mess around. there PT and stuff is crazy.
>Sorry if anyone takes offence to this opion.
>
>Adam
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:o[email protected]]On
>Behalf Of Peter deVries
>Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 1:02 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>
>
>Matt,
> Why would you want to join a foriegn army? It seems like a lot just to
>wear a maroon beret. Sure I would love to be airborne, but I wouldn‘t leave
>my country just to be a paratrooper. If I was to go to the U.K. I would
>join
>the Black Watch. But I would rather want to work for Canada than anywhere
>else. You can still be part of a jump coy in one of the infantry regiments.
>It‘s not the same as the old Airborne, but then again, the British Para‘s
>are not the same as the CAR. The British Paras are humbled because of all
>the other "Special Forces units" in Britain. IE:SAS, SBS, Royal Marine
>Commando‘s, etc... If you want to be an unconventional soldier, join the
>Canadian army, we are one of the most unconventional armies in the world, I
>don‘t think in any other army, does the ordinary soldier play so many
>roles.
>Also, we have JTF-2 which is open to both reservists and regular force
>soldiers. Anyway, something to think about. I would say that the Canadian
>soldier is thought to be one of the best, most versitile soldiers in the
>world.
>But, it is up to you, make sure you educate yourself on both armies before
>you join either one.
>Peter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: [email protected]
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
> >Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:34:32 EST
> >
> >So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
> >Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near
>future?
> >I
> >wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
> >modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
> >inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur
> >with
> >that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an
> >Airborne
> >Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
> > Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to
> >the
> >UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
> > Let‘s have it.
> > -Matt B.
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------
> >NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> >to [email protected] from the account you wish to
> >remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
> >message body.
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Peter deVries" <[email protected]> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 16:47:23
Ummm,
Well, first, in my opinion Soldering means a lot more than fighting. In
my case soldering is a way of life, not just war, or garrison duty. I think
people who get frustrated with not being able to kill people need some help.
If you talk to any veteren, they will tell you that there is nothing nice
about war. Sure if Canada went to war, I would go, no questions asked. But I
think that the Canadian soldiers job is more of a war prevention force. I‘m
not saying that I am one of those left wing hippies. To tell the truth, I
get a rush when the Sarge orders us to Fall In For Battle. But then again I
haven‘t experienced real battle.
I always get a kick out of people who think that killing is cool. In my
case, I am in the infantry so I hear a lot of it. In my opinion people like
that would be a hazard in battle. Sure you need motivated troops with lots
of agression, but at the same time you need soldiers who can put things into
perspective and can be realistic. Well, these are my thoughts.
Peter
>From: "Joan O. Arc"
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: Wed, 17 Jan 2001 15:47:27 -0000
>
>More belated input If no one else wants o revisit these subjects, which
>have probably already been thoroughly covered on the BB, I quite
>understand,
>but am only now doing a post-holiday catch up on e-mails!
>
>Re: "I don‘t think any Soldier wants war."
>
>I‘m picking up two quite different strains of thought on this question from
>this list. Those, such as Peter, who seem to see military service primarily
>as a form to service to country and who are willing to do "whatever the job
>takes" during the period in which they happen to serve. If war, fine if
>not, that‘s OK, too.
>
>But there are others who seem so keen on the idea that soldiering =
>fighting
>that they‘re willing to join other countries‘ services if it will increase
>their chances of fighting.
>
>I guess my question is: How do the majority of the members of this list who
>have served/are serving/hope to serve feel about what seems to me this
>fairly fundamental philosophical question?
>
>The reason I ask is that the other day I was talking to someone who has
>written fairly extensively about and made quite a few documentaries about
>Generally positive ones, I hasten to add. Like me, he is a civvie
>"military buff". the Cdn. Armed Forces
>
>He commented that, based on what he has seen, anyway, he thinks that
>peacekeeping may be an inherently demoralizing job for many soldiers,
>because the sort of person who seeks a career in the miltary is generally
>someone who wants an opportunity to fight, not to "sit around" figurative
>speech - NOT meant to disparage the p‘keepers efforts in any way
>preventing others from fighting.
>
>I realize this is not a particularly new observation, but it does strike me
>as a potentially important one.
>
>Again, I wonder what the views of the members of this list on this question
>might be?
>
>----Original Message Follows----
>From: "Peter deVries"
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 02:31:30
>
>Adam,
> I come from Nova Scotia, and it is just as hard to get into the military
>college out here. The thoughts are exactly the same here "That everything
>west of us gets everything" I don‘t think that Canada is biast to the
>east.
>The RCR, the PPCLI, and the VanDoos are all well known regiments outside
>Canada. And yes the British have been fighting for a while, but you have to
>consider this: I don‘t think any Soldier wants war. Sure the training is
>interesting and I would be the first one to volunteer for a tour, but war
>is
>not something to wish for. Sure the British have good kit, but the Canadian
>forces are just getting re-kitted. Anyway, In my opinion, I can‘t
>understand
>why anyone would want to join a foreign army.
>Peter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>>From: "Adam Wainwright"
>>Reply-To: [email protected]
>>To:
>>Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:45:25 -0800
>>
>>Peter,
>>I understand where Matt is coming from though. I to am seriously looking
>>into going to the UK to the royal marines. There are something‘s about my
>>situation that are frustrating, I want to be an officer and being form the
>>west coast have a definite disadvantage to eastern Canadian candidates.
>>It
>>seems that Canada is very much cantered in the east or what is east to
>>us.
>>Which it is, life here is totally different from there. Still I‘m not
>>saying that the CF in anyway does not accommodate us it just seems that
>>were
>>out of the game out here sometimes. I see Matts want to go somewhere
>>else.
>>We as a country don‘t really have any ‘big name units‘. Plus there are
>>some
>>super postings and kit in the UK. Also the mentality is totally different
>>-
>>the brits have fought a war everyday for the last 500 years. The are
>>scrappers and train to actually fight and be fighting soldiers. they
>>really
>>don‘t mess around. there PT and stuff is crazy.
>>Sorry if anyone takes offence to this opion.
>>
>>Adam
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: [email protected] [mailto:o[email protected]]On
>>Behalf Of Peter deVries
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 1:02 AM
>>To: [email protected]
>>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>>
>>
>>Matt,
>> Why would you want to join a foriegn army? It seems like a lot just to
>>wear a maroon beret. Sure I would love to be airborne, but I wouldn‘t
>>leave
>>my country just to be a paratrooper. If I was to go to the U.K. I would
>>join
>>the Black Watch. But I would rather want to work for Canada than anywhere
>>else. You can still be part of a jump coy in one of the infantry
>>regiments.
>>It‘s not the same as the old Airborne, but then again, the British Para‘s
>>are not the same as the CAR. The British Paras are humbled because of all
>>the other "Special Forces units" in Britain. IE:SAS, SBS, Royal Marine
>>Commando‘s, etc... If you want to be an unconventional soldier, join the
>>Canadian army, we are one of the most unconventional armies in the world,
>>I
>>don‘t think in any other army, does the ordinary soldier play so many
>>roles.
>>Also, we have JTF-2 which is open to both reservists and regular force
>>soldiers. Anyway, something to think about. I would say that the Canadian
>>soldier is thought to be one of the best, most versitile soldiers in the
>>world.
>>But, it is up to you, make sure you educate yourself on both armies before
>>you join either one.
>>Peter
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> >From: [email protected]
>> >Reply-To: [email protected]
>> >To: [email protected]
>> >Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>> >Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:34:32 EST
>> >
>> >So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
>> >Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near
>>future?
>> >I
>> >wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
>> >modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
>> >inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur
>> >with
>> >that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an
>> >Airborne
>> >Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
>> > Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going
>>to
>> >the
>> >UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
>> > Let‘s have it.
>> > -Matt B.
>> >
>> >--------------------------------------------------------
>> >NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>> >to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>> >remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>> >message body.
>>
>>_________________________________________________________________________
>>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------
>>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>>message body.
>>
>>--------------------------------------------------------
>>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>>message body.
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by "Todd Harris" <[email protected]> on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 11:25:49 -0500
This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
Personally,
I would love to be able to go on a Peacekeeping tour because I have always
wanted to test my mettle in a "real" situation. I‘ve spent 13 years in the
Military learning skills, going on Ex, etc... but have never actually been
in the real thing. I want to know how I‘ll stand up.
That doesn‘t necessarily mean I want a shooting war to test myself. I‘d be
just as happy leading troops in a peacetime mission. But doing it for real,
and not on an Exercise.
Todd Harris
-----Original Message-----
From: Joan O. Arc [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
More belated input If no one else wants o revisit these subjects, which
have probably already been thoroughly covered on the BB, I quite understand,
but am only now doing a post-holiday catch up on e-mails!
Re: "I don‘t think any Soldier wants war."
I‘m picking up two quite different strains of thought on this question from
this list. Those, such as Peter, who seem to see military service primarily
as a form to service to country and who are willing to do "whatever the job
takes" during the period in which they happen to serve. If war, fine if
not, that‘s OK, too.
But there are others who seem so keen on the idea that soldiering = fighting
that they‘re willing to join other countries‘ services if it will increase
their chances of fighting.
I guess my question is: How do the majority of the members of this list who
have served/are serving/hope to serve feel about what seems to me this
fairly fundamental philosophical question?
The reason I ask is that the other day I was talking to someone who has
written fairly extensively about and made quite a few documentaries about
Generally positive ones, I hasten to add. Like me, he is a civvie
"military buff". the Cdn. Armed Forces
He commented that, based on what he has seen, anyway, he thinks that
peacekeeping may be an inherently demoralizing job for many soldiers,
because the sort of person who seeks a career in the miltary is generally
someone who wants an opportunity to fight, not to "sit around" figurative
speech - NOT meant to disparage the p‘keepers efforts in any way
preventing others from fighting.
I realize this is not a particularly new observation, but it does strike me
as a potentially important one.
Again, I wonder what the views of the members of this list on this question
might be?
----Original Message Follows----
From: "Peter deVries"
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 02:31:30
Adam,
I come from Nova Scotia, and it is just as hard to get into the military
college out here. The thoughts are exactly the same here "That everything
west of us gets everything" I don‘t think that Canada is biast to the east.
The RCR, the PPCLI, and the VanDoos are all well known regiments outside
Canada. And yes the British have been fighting for a while, but you have to
consider this: I don‘t think any Soldier wants war. Sure the training is
interesting and I would be the first one to volunteer for a tour, but war is
not something to wish for. Sure the British have good kit, but the Canadian
forces are just getting re-kitted. Anyway, In my opinion, I can‘t understand
why anyone would want to join a foreign army.
Peter
>From: "Adam Wainwright"
>Reply-To: [email protected]
>To:
>Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:45:25 -0800
>
>Peter,
>I understand where Matt is coming from though. I to am seriously looking
>into going to the UK to the royal marines. There are something‘s about my
>situation that are frustrating, I want to be an officer and being form the
>west coast have a definite disadvantage to eastern Canadian candidates. It
>seems that Canada is very much cantered in the east or what is east to
>us.
>Which it is, life here is totally different from there. Still I‘m not
>saying that the CF in anyway does not accommodate us it just seems that
>were
>out of the game out here sometimes. I see Matts want to go somewhere else.
>We as a country don‘t really have any ‘big name units‘. Plus there are
>some
>super postings and kit in the UK. Also the mentality is totally different
>-
>the brits have fought a war everyday for the last 500 years. The are
>scrappers and train to actually fight and be fighting soldiers. they really
>don‘t mess around. there PT and stuff is crazy.
>Sorry if anyone takes offence to this opion.
>
>Adam
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: [email protected] [mailto:o[email protected]]On
>Behalf Of Peter deVries
>Sent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 1:02 AM
>To: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
>
>
>Matt,
> Why would you want to join a foriegn army? It seems like a lot just to
>wear a maroon beret. Sure I would love to be airborne, but I wouldn‘t leave
>my country just to be a paratrooper. If I was to go to the U.K. I would
>join
>the Black Watch. But I would rather want to work for Canada than anywhere
>else. You can still be part of a jump coy in one of the infantry regiments.
>It‘s not the same as the old Airborne, but then again, the British Para‘s
>are not the same as the CAR. The British Paras are humbled because of all
>the other "Special Forces units" in Britain. IE:SAS, SBS, Royal Marine
>Commando‘s, etc... If you want to be an unconventional soldier, join the
>Canadian army, we are one of the most unconventional armies in the world, I
>don‘t think in any other army, does the ordinary soldier play so many
>roles.
>Also, we have JTF-2 which is open to both reservists and regular force
>soldiers. Anyway, something to think about. I would say that the Canadian
>soldier is thought to be one of the best, most versitile soldiers in the
>world.
>But, it is up to you, make sure you educate yourself on both armies before
>you join either one.
>Peter
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >From: [email protected]
> >Reply-To: [email protected]
> >To: [email protected]
> >Subject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
> >Date: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:34:32 EST
> >
> >So, with all that said, does anyone think that there will be a Parachute
> >Regiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada in the relatively near
>future?
> >I
> >wouldn‘t think so, because the common feeling seems to be that, in these
> >modern times, parachuting masses of manpower and materiel is a very
> >inefficient mode to transportation for the military. I think most concur
> >with
> >that. So is it basically understood that forming, or resurrecting an
> >Airborne
> >Unit would be a waste, and a rather poor placement of funds?
> > Just to clear something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to
> >the
> >UK, only that I‘m giving it very serious consideration
> > Let‘s have it.
> > -Matt B.
> >
> >--------------------------------------------------------
> >NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
> >to [email protected] from the account you wish to
> >remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
> >message body.
>
>_________________________________________________________________________
>Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
>
>--------------------------------------------------------
>NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
>to [email protected] from the account you wish to
>remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
>message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
_________________________________________________________________________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
Personally,
I would love to be able to go on a Peacekeeping tour
because I have always wanted to test my mettle in a quotrealquot
situation. I‘ve spent 13 years in the Military learning skills,
going on Ex, etc... but have never actually been in the real
thing. I want to know how I‘ll stand up.
That doesn‘t necessarily mean I want a shooting war
to test myself. I‘d be just as happy leading troops in a
peacetime mission. But doing it for real, and not on an
Exercise.
Todd Harris
-----Original Message-----
From: Joan O. Arc [mailto:[email protected]
]
Sent: Wednesday, January 17, 2001 10:47
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
More belated input If no one else wants o revisit
these subjects, which
have probably already been thoroughly covered on the
BB, I quite understand,
but am only now doing a post-holiday catch up on
e-mails!
Re: quotI don‘t think any Soldier wants
war.quot
I‘m picking up two quite different strains of thought
on this question from
this list. Those, such as Peter, who seem to see
military service primarily
as a form to service to country and who are willing
to do quotwhatever the job
takesquot during the period in which they happen
to serve. If war, fine if
not, that‘s OK, too.
But there are others who seem so keen on the idea
that soldiering =3D fighting
that they‘re willing to join other countries‘
services if it will increase
their chances of fighting.
I guess my question is: How do the majority of the
members of this list who
have served/are serving/hope to serve feel about
what seems to me this
fairly fundamental philosophical question?
The reason I ask is that the other day I was talking
to someone who has
written fairly extensively about and made quite a
few documentaries about
Generally positive ones, I hasten to add.
Like me, he is a civvie
quotmilitary buffquot. the Cdn. Armed
Forces
He commented that, based on what he has seen, anyway,
he thinks that
peacekeeping may be an inherently demoralizing job
for many soldiers,
because the sort of person who seeks a career in the
miltary is generally
someone who wants an opportunity to fight, not to
quotsit aroundquot figurative
speech - NOT meant to disparage the p‘keepers
efforts in any way
preventing others from fighting.
I realize this is not a particularly new observation,
but it does strike me
as a potentially important one.
Again, I wonder what the views of the members of this
list on this question
might be?
----Original Message Follows----
From: quotPeter deVriesquot
[email protected]
Reply-To: [email protected]
To: [email protected]
Subject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
Date: Tue, 02 Jan 2001 02:31:30
Adam,
I come from Nova Scotia, and it is just
as hard to get into the military
college out here. The thoughts are exactly the same
here quotThat everything
west of us gets everythingquot I don‘t think
that Canada is biast to the east.
The RCR, the PPCLI, and the VanDoos are all well
known regiments outside
Canada. And yes the British have been fighting for a
while, but you have to
consider this: I don‘t think any Soldier wants war.
Sure the training is
interesting and I would be the first one to
volunteer for a tour, but war is
not something to wish for. Sure the British have
good kit, but the Canadian
forces are just getting re-kitted. Anyway, In my
opinion, I can‘t understand
why anyone would want to join a foreign army.
Peter
gtFrom: quotAdam Wainwrightquot
[email protected]
gtReply-To: [email protected]
gtTo: [email protected]
gtSubject: RE: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
gtDate: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 17:45:25 -0800
gt
gtPeter,
gtI understand where Matt is coming from
though. I to am seriously looking
gtinto going to the UK to the royal marines.
There are something‘s about my
gtsituation that are frustrating, I want to be an
officer and being form the
gtwest coast have a definite disadvantage to
eastern Canadian candidates. It
gtseems that Canada is very much cantered in the
east or what is east to
gtus.
gtWhich it is, life here is totally different from
there. Still I‘m not
gtsaying that the CF in anyway does not
accommodate us it just seems that
gtwere
gtout of the game out here sometimes. I see
Matts want to go somewhere else.
gtWe as a country don‘t really have any ‘big name
units‘. Plus there are
gtsome
gtsuper postings and kit in the UK. Also the
mentality is totally different
gt-
gtthe brits have fought a war everyday for the
last 500 years. The are
gtscrappers and train to actually fight and be
fighting soldiers. they really
gtdon‘t mess around. there PT and stuff is
crazy.
gtSorry if anyone takes offence to this
opion.
gt
gtAdam
gt
gt-----Original Message-----
gtFrom: [email protected] [mailto:owner-army-list@CdnArm
y.ca]On
gtBehalf Of Peter deVries
gtSent: Tuesday, January 02, 2001 1:02 AM
gtTo: [email protected]
gtSubject: Re: [Re: Parachute Batallion?]
gt
gt
gtMatt,
gt Why would you want to join a
foriegn army? It seems like a lot just to
gtwear a maroon beret. Sure I would love to be
airborne, but I wouldn‘t leave
gtmy country just to be a paratrooper. If I was to
go to the U.K. I would
gtjoin
gtthe Black Watch. But I would rather want to work
for Canada than anywhere
gtelse. You can still be part of a jump coy in one
of the infantry regiments.
gtIt‘s not the same as the old Airborne, but then
again, the British Para‘s
gtare not the same as the CAR. The British Paras
are humbled because of all
gtthe other quotSpecial Forces unitsquot in
Britain. IE:SAS, SBS, Royal Marine
gtCommando‘s, etc... If you want to be an
unconventional soldier, join the
gtCanadian army, we are one of the most
unconventional armies in the world, I
gtdon‘t think in any other army, does the ordinary
soldier play so many
gtroles.
gtAlso, we have JTF-2 which is open to both
reservists and regular force
gtsoldiers. Anyway, something to think about. I
would say that the Canadian
gtsoldier is thought to be one of the best, most
versitile soldiers in the
gtworld.
gtBut, it is up to you, make sure you educate
yourself on both armies before
gtyou join either one.
gtPeter
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt
gt gtFrom: [email protected]
gt gtReply-To: [email protected]
gt gtTo: [email protected]
gt gtSubject: Re: [Re: Parachute
Batallion?]
gt gtDate: Mon, 1 Jan 2001 18:34:32 EST
gt gt
gt gtSo, with all that said, does anyone think
that there will be a Parachute
gt gtRegiment or CAR type unit erected in Canada
in the relatively near
gtfuture?
gt gtI
gt gtwouldn‘t think so, because the common
feeling seems to be that, in these
gt gtmodern times, parachuting masses of
manpower and materiel is a very
gt gtinefficient mode to transportation for the
military. I think most concur
gt gtwith
gt gtthat. So is it basically understood that
forming, or resurrecting an
gt gtAirborne
gt gtUnit would be a waste, and a rather poor
placement of funds?
gt gt Just to clear
something up, I didn‘t mean to say that I AM going to
gt gtthe
gt gtUK, only that I‘m giving it very serious
consideration
gt gt Let‘s have
it.
gt
gtn
bsp -Matt B.
gt gt
gt
gt--------------------------------------------------------
gt gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this
list, send a message
gt gtto [email protected] from the account
you wish to
gt gtremove, with the line quotunsubscribe
army-listquot in the
gt gtmessage body.
gt
gt___________________________________________________________
______________
gtGet Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail
at http://www.hotmail.com.
gt
gt--------------------------------------------------------
gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this list,
send a message
gtto [email protected] from the account you
wish to
gtremove, with the line quotunsubscribe
army-listquot in the
gtmessage body.
gt
gt--------------------------------------------------------
gtNOTE: To remove yourself from this list,
send a message
gtto [email protected] from the account you
wish to
gtremove, with the line quotunsubscribe
army-listquot in the
gtmessage body.
_______________________________________________________________
__________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send
a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish
to
remove, with the line quotunsubscribe
army-listquot in the
message body.
_______________________________________________________________
__________
Get Your Private, Free E-mail from MSN Hotmail at http://www.hotmail.com.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send
a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish
to
remove, with the line quotunsubscribe
army-listquot in the
message body.
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Posted by [email protected] on Wed, 17 Jan 2001 18:39:59 EST
Joan,
I met very few soldiers in the U.S. Army who wanted a war. When I came in,
it was at the end of Vietnam, and so there were a lot of combat vets
around...plus a few with combat experience in WWII and Korea. The consensus
was that while there were positive experiences during wartime, the bad
outweighed the good. When my tank battalion was alerted to deploy to
Afghanistan in 1979, there was a great feeling of relief when that didn‘t
happen.
For those of us that hadn‘t served in combat, we had a half-assed notion that
it would be good to see if we could actually do the job we were trained to do
for real. It felt like always practicing football, but never playing a game.
But that attitude took into account that it would be infinitely preferable
in the long run to never find out. Do I feel less of a soldier because of
never seeing real combat? Of course I do. Those that have performed in war
hold my highest admiration. But all the same, there are a whole lot of us
alive today, who wouldn‘t have survived a war with the Warsaw Pact forces in
Europe, or a counter-invasion of Afghanistan. So, we hang our "Cold War
Certificate of Recognition" on the wall, alongside our peacetime decorations,
and wonder what it would have been like...and thank God we‘ll never find out.
Dave Hall
--------------------------------------------------------
NOTE: To remove yourself from this list, send a message
to [email protected] from the account you wish to
remove, with the line "unsubscribe army-list" in the
message body.
 
Back
Top