Gunner
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 11
- Points
- 430
Geez, if I could just get Mrs Gunner to say that!Gunner - You are correct
Cheers!
Geez, if I could just get Mrs Gunner to say that!Gunner - You are correct
G3, some armour corps types would also argue that you can‘t put a MGS into a herc eventhough the CLS said you could...and you can‘t put an M109 on a herc...
I‘m of two minds about CMTC. In a perfect world I fully support CMTC as a much needed capability for our army and is the natural progression of training (realistic force on force) that our collective training has always been lacking. My problem with CMTC is it is resource intensive to operate and IMHO there is a huge possibility that it will morph into an expensive albatross that the army can‘t afford. Moreover it is so expensive, units will only be able to participate once every three years.if you guys look into it the reason they lost their 109‘s was so that the manauver centre in Wainwright can have them for the new training system they have. although its a blow to 2horse i believe its a step forward for the army in that they can now train a battle group with out the cost of railheading all the equipment.
It will be a tight squeeze, but I saw the mock ups at the London factory, so I believe it...Originally posted by Gunner:
G3, some armour corps types would also argue that you can‘t put a MGS into a herc eventhough the CLS said you could... [/QB]
Mountie said:But the South African Denel 105 LEO gun has a 30,000 km range, its new shells have a larger kill radius than the 155 and it can be mounted in a turret on a LAV-III or mounted on a truck like the CAESAR or the MAVS/MOBAT.