• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Replacing the Subs

More importantly (might as well start now!): what do we have twelve of that would be good names for a Sub?
 
"Canada is taking the first step"

"launching the process to formally engage industry"

"currently in the process of meeting with manufacturers and potential partners"

"A formal Request for Information will be posted in fall 2024"


'Scuz me if I hold my applause.
 
Strengthened sail, protection for masts and periscope for surfacing through light pan ice and perhaps combining some of the newer battery tech with AIP? Likely a sub might accompany a AOP's with the AOP providing ice recon and ice/weather information to it.
Apparently the Portuguese operated one of their Tridente-Class AIP subs under the arctic ice for 4 days this April...so while an SSN would be ideal and strengthening for surfacing through the ice might be preferable, it appears that neither are deal-breakers for under-ice operations.

 
Apparently the Portuguese operated one of their Tridente-Class AIP subs under the arctic ice for 4 days this April...so while an SSN would be ideal and strengthening for surfacing through the ice might be preferable, it appears that neither are deal-breakers for under-ice operations.

That is near ice operations. Close enough to run for open water if necessary or probably ice that is thin enough that just about anything can break through.
 
That is near ice operations. Close enough to run for open water if necessary or probably ice that is thin enough that just about anything can break through.
yeah are we talking about traversing the NWP in late Feb or rounding Ellesmere Island?
 
212CD subs have six ordered and are delivering between 29-35 right now. If we were to wait in line we wouldn't get new subs for 12 years minimum. If the Norwegians or Germans were willing to move their production line around we might get one in 32 (say one of the two nations defer theirs to later). The TKMS bid for the Netherlands project did offer a 212CD Expeditionary submarine (same sub, longer with more legs) and they said they could deliver it 2031

Korea is currently producing KSS III block 2 submarines and would be able to deliver 2029/30 if we were to order now.

Netherlands (variant of the Barracude from the French) submarine orders are arriving between 2032 and 2037

C71 from Sweden isn't in production so one might be able to jump on those right away and get submarines delivered in 2-5 years (2028-30).

Japan and Spain are also currently producing submarines and depending on negotiations they may let us jump the que for some subs sooner then later.

yeah are we talking about traversing the NWP in late Feb or rounding Ellesmere Island?
Neither. Arctic approaches (as stated by the CRNC in his recent interview with the US Naval Institute) are the goal here.

So we're looking in Baffin Bay and the Beaufort Sea. So leave Halifax and take up position at the Eastern entrance to NWP or leave Victoria and do the same at the Western Entrance. And go all over in the summer.
 
212CD subs have six ordered and are delivering between 29-35 right now. If we were to wait in line we wouldn't get new subs for 12 years minimum. If the Norwegians or Germans were willing to move their production line around we might get one in 32 (say one of the two nations defer theirs to later). The TKMS bid for the Netherlands project did offer a 212CD Expeditionary submarine (same sub, longer with more legs) and they said they could deliver it 2031

Korea is currently producing KSS III block 2 submarines and would be able to deliver 2029/30 if we were to order now.

Netherlands submarine orders are arriving between 2032 and 2037

C71 from Sweden isn't in production so one might be able to jump on those right away and get submarines delivered in 2-5 years (2028-30).

Japan and Spain are also currently producing submarines and depending on negotiations they may let us jump the que for some subs sooner then later.


Neither. Arctic approaches (as stated by the CRNC in his recent interview with the US Naval Institute) are the goal here.

So we're looking in Baffin Bay and the Beaufort Sea. So leave Halifax and take up position at the Eastern entrance to NWP or leave Victoria and do the same at the Western Entrance. And go all over in the summer.
so really shouldnt be an issue. Prioritize range and endurance
 
That is near ice operations. Close enough to run for open water if necessary or probably ice that is thin enough that just about anything can break through.
We'll never hear the details of their ops open source, but from the posts it says under ice ops, not near ice ops.
where she carried out a total of 4 days of immersion under the Arctic ice
No indication though of the thickness of the ice or how far from the ice edge they penetrated. So the question is, how far do we need to go under the ice to defend the arctic approaches?
 
Korea is currently producing KSS III block 2 submarines and would be able to deliver 2029/30 if we were to order now.
Hanwha's yard is under capacity right now and are building subs at a rate of 1 every 4 years. They have the ability to increase capacity to potentially 3 simultaneous builds. If we ordered now, its entirely possible we could have them by 2028 for sea trials.
 
:p:D:cdn: Happy Birthday to this thread! 5 years of my originally projected 10 year life span of this thread!

Is it wrong to be proud of this thread I started? LOL.....

Happy Birthday GIF by Sesame Street


129 pages and 2579 posts!

Something in this life that I started may live past me! lol
 
HMCS Rainbow was originally USS  Argonaut, so we could name them after CFL teams.

Argonauts
Allouettes
Rough Riders
TigerCats
Blue Bombers
Rough Riders
Elks
Stampeders
Lions

To get twelve, we could add Concordes and Renegades, and either Stallions or Barracudas.
 
Back
Top