• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Replacing the Subs

One big thing I was looking at with the two designs is the German sub will require half the manning the Korean subs do. That is a serious factor for us considering how difficult it is to get people into the sub service in the first place.
 
One big thing I was looking at with the two designs is the German sub will require half the manning the Korean subs do. That is a serious factor for us considering how difficult it is to get people into the sub service in the first place.
I thought that the crewing sizes were about the exact same, maybe the SK requires like 3 more bodies than the German boat.
 
Enjoy!

Navy commander says Canada could end up with subs from two different suppliers​


Vice-Admiral Angus Topshee says the Royal Canadian Navy could end up with submarines supplied by both companies vying for Ottawa’s lucrative sub procurement contract — and there could be advantages to diversifying the fleet.

I wonder if this comment is teeing us up to running 2 fighter fleets......


Topshee is quite the pot stirrer as an outsider looking in.
 
Last edited:
If we go with the German CD option, we have a guaranteed delay of at least 12 years.

Probably 10 years for the next one....

That feels in line with this government's direction of travel. It never seems to say no. Now the response is "eventually".
 
One big thing I was looking at with the two designs is the German sub will require half the manning the Korean subs do. That is a serious factor for us considering how difficult it is to get people into the sub service in the first place.
They actually have the same crew requirements. The KSS-III simply has extra bunk space.
 
Back
Top