• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

SOCOM to GO With 6.5mm Bullet

tomahawk6

Army.ca Legend
Inactive
Reaction score
66
Points
530
Click on the image at link for a close up.

http://soldiersystems.net/2018/03/23/ussocom-adopts-6-5-cm/
 
My understanding is that the 6.5 had issues with the case length being a bit to short for the current MG links and gas erosion around the throat?
 
Does SOCOM even want a 6.5 Creedmore machine gun? I thought they were just looking at using it in SCAR-H and M110 rifles, and keeping all their machineguns in 7.62mm NATO.
 
Does anyone else remember all the jokes we made back in the sixties about the 6.5mm caliber of the Italian Carcano rifle?

:pop:
 
I had the AGB42 in 6.5x55, a fast deadly bullet that one was. Mind you the action was aching to bite you.
 
FJAG said:
Does anyone else remember all the jokes we made back in the sixties about the 6.5mm caliber of the Italian Carcano rifle?

:pop:


I see what you did there...
 
Colin P said:
My understanding is that the 6.5 had issues with the case length being a bit to short for the current MG links and gas erosion around the throat?

That may have been testing on the 6.5 Grendel....
 
I was under the impression that the 6.5cm was incredibly accurate however there were concerns with its terminal ballastics making it good for target shooting but less so for killing evil doers. That when it was relatively new so maybe things changed.
 
I suspect that a barrel change is required.SOCOM tested the bullet using a .308 case I think.
 
tomahawk6 said:
I suspect that a barrel change is required.SOCOM tested the bullet using a .308 case I think.

Like a .243 winchester? (6.17mm in a .308 case).
 
Jarnhamar said:
I was under the impression that the 6.5cm was incredibly accurate however there were concerns with its terminal ballastics making it good for target shooting but less so for killing evil doers. That when it was relatively new so maybe things changed.

I'm reasonably certain that an evil doer hit with a 6.5cm round is going down.  6.5mm, on the other hand ;)
 
dapaterson said:
I'm reasonably certain that an evil doer hit with a 6.5cm round is going down.  6.5mm, on the other hand ;)

:rofl:
 
Jarnhamar said:
I was under the impression that the 6.5cm was incredibly accurate however there were concerns with its terminal ballastics making it good for target shooting but less so for killing evil doers. That when it was relatively new so maybe things changed.

The better ballistics of the 6.5 bullet allow for it to carry more energy further, with more accuracy at a significantly higher BC as well as more ft/lbs.
 
People use 6.5mm x 55 Swedish to take down Moose, I suspect this will work as well.
 
Colin P said:
People use 6.5mm x 55 Swedish to take down Moose, I suspect this will work as well.

But what about Squirrel?

images
 
I think the bullet for 6.5x55 Swedish would be too long for the C7 platform. It would probably work on an AR-10 platform though.
 
recceguy said:
I think the bullet for 6.5x55 Swedish would be too long for the C7 platform. It would probably work on an AR-10 platform though.

:nod: 10 more mm on the cartridge over a 5.56x45 probably rules that out as an option on the AR-15/M4/C7_8/etc platform.  The Creedmoor cartridge is what, 49mm? Barring breech face size limitations, could AR-15 format take a Creedmoor 6.5 barrel/breech?

G2G
 
Back
Top