• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

Superyacht owned by Facebook founder may have ignored a distress call off the coast of Alaska

dapaterson

Army.ca Dinosaur
Subscriber
Donor
Reaction score
42,281
Points
1,210
Second and third had reports are suggesting that "Launchpad" and "Wingman", the super yacht and support boat operated by Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg may have ignored a call for assistance off the coast of Alaska.

That’s a dick move if true. There’s something called “The Law of the Sea” isn’t there?
Basically says if you hear a distress call you must respond…
 
Very last paragraph in the article:

Update –
Brian Baker a spokesperson for Mark Zuckerberg and Priscila Chan issued the below statement –
“Mark and his family were not on board at the time of the incident. As the Coast Guard noted, the boat was not in distress, and by the time the crew reviewed the Coast Guard contact on a different radio channel from the one they were operating on, the assist was already underway. We’re grateful all parties are safe.”

But how about being so rich you don't just have a superyacht, you also have your own AOR/JSS to support it... Boss.
 
That’s a dick move if true. There’s something called “The Law of the Sea” isn’t there?
Basically says if you hear a distress call you must respond…
I was sailing my boat from Nanaimo to Deep Bay and heard a distress call of a boat on fire. It was 5 miles away and I was limited to 7 knots but I responded anyway. Thankfully an actual fast rescue craft also responded and I was relieved of my responsibility. That's how you do it.
 
Very last paragraph in the article:



But how about being so rich you don't just have a superyacht, you also have your own AOR/JSS to support it... Boss.
I wonder if Amazon and Space-ex Lex Luthor types have bigger fleets than Zuckerburg
 
I was sailing my boat from Nanaimo to Deep Bay and heard a distress call of a boat on fire. It was 5 miles away and I was limited to 7 knots but I responded anyway. Thankfully an actual fast rescue craft also responded and I was relieved of my responsibility. That's how you do it.
My favourite was when the Götheborg (a reproduction tall ship) responded to a distress call in 2023. Can only imagine what the people being rescued felt.
 
I was sailing my boat from Nanaimo to Deep Bay and heard a distress call of a boat on fire. It was 5 miles away and I was limited to 7 knots but I responded anyway. Thankfully an actual fast rescue craft also responded and I was relieved of my responsibility. That's how you do it.

My wife and I just got our first boat. This is as far as I want to go with boats. Money pits.
 
That’s a dick move if true. There’s something called “The Law of the Sea” isn’t there?
Basically says if you hear a distress call you must respond…
Not if it puts you in danger or not equipped to do so. I can see the owners yacht not responding for security reason if the owners is onboard, but they could have had their support vessel respond.
 
Not if it puts you in danger or not equipped to do so.
Bet that one would be hard to argue for two vessels of that size operating in company, likely with the world's selection of small craft aboard.
I can see the owners yacht not responding for security reason if the owners is onboard, but they could have had their support vessel respond.
Absolutely.

That said, not sure if "ewwww, poors"/Clive Cussler-grade assassination scheme concerns should be allowed in the same breath as "my vessel will sink," or "I'm a 16' tin boat, I'm not towing a freighter with a mechanical casualty."
 
Update –
Brian Baker a spokesperson for Mark Zuckerberg and Priscila Chan issued the below statement –
“Mark and his family were not on board at the time of the incident. As the Coast Guard noted, the boat was not in distress, and by the time the crew reviewed the Coast Guard contact on a different radio channel from the one they were operating on, the assist was already underway. We’re grateful all parties are safe.”

I read that as Zuckerberg's crew was operating with one radio on one channel and after switching channels became aware of the request for assist. Perhaps someone with experience running vessels at sea could clarify if my impression is correct - that vessels the size of Zuckerberg's yacht and support ship are required to monitor both channel 13 (156.650 MHz) and channel 16 (156.800 MHz) while in US waters.



Radio Watchkeeping Regulations
In general, any vessel equipped with a VHF marine radiotelephone (whether voluntarily or required to) must maintain a watch on channel 16 (156.800 MHz) whenever the radiotelephone is not being used to communicate.

Source: FCC 47 CFR §§ 80.148, 80.310, NTIA Manual 8.2.29.6.c(2)(e), ITU RR 31.18, 52.244

In addition, every power-driven vessel of 20 meters or over in length or of 100 tons and upwards carrying one or more passengers for hire, or a towing vessel of 26 feet or over in length, as well, as every dredge and floating plant operating near a channel or fairway, must also maintain a watch on channel 13 (156.650 MHz) --channel 67 (156.375 MHz) if operating on the lower Mississippi River-- ; while navigating on U.S. waters (which include the territorial sea, internal waters that are subject to tidal influence, and, those not subject to tidal influence but that are used or are determined to be capable of being used for substantial interstate or foreign commerce). Sequential monitoring techniques (scanners) alone cannot be used to meet this requirement; two radios (including portable radios, i.e. handhelds) or one radio with two receivers, are required. These vessels must also maintain a watch on the designated Vessel Traffic Service (VTS) frequency, in lieu of maintaining watch on channel 16, while transiting within a VTS area. See 33 CFR §§ 2.36, 26, and 161; 47 CFR §§ 80.148, 80.308-309; NTIA: NTIA Manual Chapter 8.2.29.7.


 
Back
Top