• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The Arctic

This has been a perennial issue for Norway, and Canada too...

Norwegian MoD Stresses Importance of Enough People in Northern Norway

Bodø (High North News): The Norwegian government wants to strengthen defense in the far north and establish the Finnmark Brigade. According to the MoD, securing settlement in this region is high on the agenda. "If things get really serious, we are dependent on civilian society and the function of total defense," he says.


"There is construction activity nearly wherever you turn in Porsangmoen in Finnmark county. The development is very positive. This was a garrison close to decommission a few years ago," says MoD Bjørn Arild Gram (Center) in an interview with High North News.

The government's new long-term plan for the Norwegian Armed Forces places great emphasis on strengthening the Army and building a brand new Finnmark Brigade in Norway's northernmost county.

"The government is strengthening the Armed Forces in general. We need a greater defense with more modern capabilities. We build from what we have, and a build-up of the Finnmark land defense is already taking place," says Gram.

New military land structure

The Finnmark land defense consists of the garrison in Sør-Varanger, Porsanger Batallion, and Finnmark Home Guard District (HV-17).

"We see the potential in developing the Finnmark land defense to brigade size, which will allow this complex force to operate more independently," says Gram.

A brigade typically consists of about 3000 to 5000 soldiers. Today, Brigade Nord, with its focal point in Inner Troms, is the only brigade in the Norwegian Armed Forces.

The MoD explains that the major investment in the Finnmark Brigade involves a new infantry battalion, artillery battalion, and a number of new elements connected to military police, management, and logistics. The Home Guard will also be strengthened in the North, with anti-tank warfare and air force capacities.

"This is a collective investment based on what is already under construction."


Norwegian MoD Stresses Importance of Enough People in Northern Norway (highnorthnews.com)
Finnmark
Area: 48,618 sq km
Population: 75,540 (2019)

Yukon
Area: 482,443 sq km
Population: 45,384 (2024 est)

Finnmark is 1/10th the size of the Yukon and has 1.66 times the population.

The vast size of Canada's Territories and the incredibly small population there really is a huge challenge for the CAF compared to what other NATO arctic countries face. We really need a concerted all of government effort to develop the North in order to support the services, population and economy we need there to properly secure and defend our sovereignty.
 
Finnmark
Area: 48,618 sq km
Population: 75,540 (2019)

Yukon
Area: 482,443 sq km
Population: 45,384 (2024 est)

Finnmark is 1/10th the size of the Yukon and has 1.66 times the population.
It's a lot easier to access points of interest in Finnmark simply because of the presence of an ice-free coast and the narrowness of the land between the water's edge and neighbouring borders.
 
It's a lot easier to access points of interest in Finnmark simply because of the presence of an ice-free coast and the narrowness of the land between the water's edge and neighbouring borders.

And these guys are just a short sail away ;)

 
It's a lot easier to access points of interest in Finnmark simply because of the presence of an ice-free coast and the narrowness of the land between the water's edge and neighbouring borders.

And Sweden has kicked off a desperate game of 'catch up', which it might not win...

Sweden is joining Nato, but it’s hopelessly unprepared for war​


he Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022 came as a rude awakening for Sweden. Across the country people suddenly realised that national security vulnerabilities were everywhere. The entire public transit rail network in Stockholm, for example, is operated by MTR, a Hong Kong-based company with ties to the Chinese Communist party.

In the event of Stockholm being attacked by foreign forces, most of the detail about critical infrastructure and tunnels running under the city centre – home to the Swedish parliament, the prime minister’s residence, the state department, the royal castle – could be shared with enemies.

“We have to assume that everything MTR knows about tunnels and infrastructure in Stockholm is also known in Beijing,” says Patrik Oksanen, an expert on national security.

Sweden is set to join Nato this year, with Hungary’s long-delayed parliamentary approval finally voted through on Monday. Turkey lifted its objections in January. This is a historic shift: after more than two centuries of peace, neutral Sweden will have to rapidly adjust to a belligerent new world.

But that came with a blunt warning: from civil defence minister Carl-Oskar Bohlin, that “there could be war in Sweden”. If that wasn’t alarming enough, Sweden’s chief of defence, Micael Bydén, followed up by saying that the Swedish population needed to “mentally prepare” for the possibility of war. Both drew criticism for causing panic: many Swedish children took to TikTok to share their fears. The warnings may have been clumsily worded but they were intended to wake the country up from a long slumber of geopolitical naivety.

As a growing number of national security experts in Sweden have pointed out, the current state of Swedish infrastructure and extent of foreign ownership leave Sweden uniquely vulnerable. It certainly makes a mockery of the Swedish “total defence” tradition, where everything from grain supply chains to fire departments is supposedly involved in protecting the country and its people in the event of disaster or invasion.


 
NORAD and Northcom IT contract.


Recently awarded a $229 million Pentagon contract, the IT firm SAIC sees its mission to modernize systems at US Northern Command and NORAD as critical to fending off America’s foes, especially in the Arctic, a company executive told Breaking Defense.


 
Back in the day we had a thing referred to as the "mobile striking force:" essentially the 2nd battalion of each of The RCR, the PPCI and the R22R were (partial) parachute battalions and were trained and, to a degree, equipped for Arctic operations.

The perceived threat, we were told, was based on the fact that the Germans managed to install, operate and maintain a weather station in Canada during the 1939-45 dustup and we were unable to detect or deal with it.

One of the (many and often conflicting) ideas behind the creation of the Airborne Regiment in 1968 was that it would be able to move, quickly and decisively against any similar incursion.

The thinking was, I believe, that no-one, not the Russians, anyway, could land and sustain a force of any size in our Arctic so we needed, at b best, a small brigade for the "Defence of Canada:" maybe two, small (3 company) airborne battalions with some appropriate supporting arms and services.
 
Russian pilot acting like an a$$hole. Next time they try a stunt like this the USAF should shoot them down!


top gun GIF


Or just....
 
Back in the day we had a thing referred to as the "mobile striking force:" essentially the 2nd battalion of each of The RCR, the PPCI and the R22R were (partial) parachute battalions and were trained and, to a degree, equipped for Arctic operations.

The perceived threat, we were told, was based on the fact that the Germans managed to install, operate and maintain a weather station in Canada during the 1939-45 dustup and we were unable to detect or deal with it.

One of the (many and often conflicting) ideas behind the creation of the Airborne Regiment in 1968 was that it would be able to move, quickly and decisively against any similar incursion.

The thinking was, I believe, that no-one, not the Russians, anyway, could land and sustain a force of any size in our Arctic so we needed, at b best, a small brigade for the "Defence of Canada:" maybe two, small (3 company) airborne battalions with some appropriate supporting arms and services.
I see the Arctic threat as combined Chinese and Russian intrusions dressed up as "Civilian Research", followed up with the rapid building of infrastructure. Mould bay certainly is one such place, on the edge of the archipelago and the waters, weather and ice around it fairly well known.
 

North Warning System, 12 Nuclear subs, Special Service Brigade, Militia Vital Points troops (these days they would be GBAD heavy I believe), Bv206s and Bison APCs (thin skinned but easy to operate, all terrain and amphibious).

The Bvs are back on the horizon. The Bison are likely to be replaced by an armoured Silverado. And again we are talking about 12 subs.

Can we reset to 1984? And this time get Operation Brave Lion right?

I was unaware of this thread until the latest post.

I hugely appreciate the first link above, which includes a link to the 1987 White Paper. Thanks tons.

The first two paragraphs at the top of the fourth page have always been the most interesting to me, ever since acquiring the paper document, which has been buried in a box for a few decades now. I was one of the "group of young Canadian Forces officers stationed in Germany", and meeting with Mr Beatty in the Black Forest Officers' Mess on two separate Friday night Happy Hours was a great pleasure. I had never before seen a defence minister so interested and keen on his or her job, who asked such intelligent and well-considered questions, who listened so intently to the answers, responded with detailed secondary questions, took our answers to heart, and creditted us in a White Paper many months later. It was most uplifting.

And no minister has come close since then. Most have been bitter disappointments. Some have been bitter, bitter disappointments.
 
Back in the day we had a thing referred to as the "mobile striking force:" essentially the 2nd battalion of each of The RCR, the PPCI and the R22R were (partial) parachute battalions and were trained and, to a degree, equipped for Arctic operations.

The perceived threat, we were told, was based on the fact that the Germans managed to install, operate and maintain a weather station in Canada during the 1939-45 dustup and we were unable to detect or deal with it.

One of the (many and often conflicting) ideas behind the creation of the Airborne Regiment in 1968 was that it would be able to move, quickly and decisively against any similar incursion.

The thinking was, I believe, that no-one, not the Russians, anyway, could land and sustain a force of any size in our Arctic so we needed, at b best, a small brigade for the "Defence of Canada:" maybe two, small (3 company) airborne battalions with some appropriate supporting arms and services.


My take now is

3x Special Service Force (Regulars)
1x Armoured Brigade
1x Artillery Brigade
Support troops.

The SSFs function as ready forces but also function as the core element to which other troops can be attached to create viable brigades.

Meanwhile there are enough elements there to create 2 divisions. A division could be as small as a reinforced brigade to which allied elements could be attached. Alternately it could be 3 small brigades. With two Div HQs Canada could field both simultaneously.
 
To succeed in the Arctic it must be a "All of government(s)" approach. There are many issues that intersects the needs of different levels of government and Departments.

Example: Airport improvements. If the Airport to accommodate DND needs more space for a new hanger, sewage and power system and extended runway. DND/PWGS provides the extra funding, along with TC and other Departments. The Feds and Territorials government also kick in some infrastructure funding to cover the civilian side. The planning is done together and perhaps the entire project is contracted as one and outside just DND.

Same with Ports, roads, communications and government buildings
 
Gunners in the Arctic.

Headline notwithstanding I am pretty sure the gunners were real even if the enemy was not.

How NATO make-believe artillerists get comfy with a real-world foe​

By Elisabeth Gosselin-Malo
Wednesday, Nov 27, 2024

QFI5WMAVNZE67NCMYSS3VVDQ3I.jpeg
French artillerymen attempt to keep warm next to one of their Caesar howitzers during a Nov. 20, 2024, NATO exercise in Finland. (Elisabeth Gosselin-Malo/staff)
ROVANIEMI, Finland — As artillery units from several NATO countries confronted a fictitious enemy here last week, one adversary was very real: cold weather.

It’s an age-old reality for countries featuring extreme locales, including the European alliance nations of Norway, Finland, and Sweden plus member countries Canada and the United States across the Atlantic. For the Finns, the challenge of operating in Arctic conditions is woven into military doctrine, which teaches that inexperience with weather can be a greater threat to soldiers’ lives than lackluster fighting skills.


Nested in Finland’s dense coniferous forests of pine trees, north of the Arctic Circle, NATO artillery units convened here in mid-November to learn not only how to survive but how to thrive in this type of environment.

“At times, the cold and Arctic-like conditions found here can be more threatening to soldiers than combat situations,” Lieutenant Olli Taskinen, member of the Jaeger Brigade, a unit of the Finnish Army in charge of developing Arctic warfare tactics, told Defense News on Nov. 19.

During their stay here, in the context of Exercise Lightning Strike 24 focused on joint long-range fire capabilities, British, French, Swedish, and American artillerymen tested themselves in a setting a majority of them have not typically been exposed to.


RELATED​

PSX7LXVZGZAIPK35RKURJ3C6XY.jpeg

NATO artillery units link up their fires in Europe’s snowy north

Ideally, it’s a relay race of sensors and shooters across multiple nationalities, in the blink of an eye.​

By Elisabeth Gosselin-Malo
The knowledge passed down by the Finns ranged from basic skills, such as putting newspaper under soldiers’ socks and boots to take off the moisture, to more complex elements, such as driving multi-ton armored vehicles on slippery roads and keeping howitzers running in temperatures capable of reaching -30 degrees Celsius (-22 Fahrenheit).

For example, Taskinen noted that some weapons have a tendency to jam more in the cold, which can be fatal in the face of an enemy attack.

“In the weather we see here, often we opt to keep our guns frozen by leaving them outside tents – if you take it inside, all the snow and ice gets inside of them and then if you go outside it freezes [again] completely… Keep it completely outside or inside the tent, no in-between,” Taskinen said.

For bigger pieces of equipment such as the K9 155mm self-propelled howitzers, a Finnish engineer said that there is a question of timing – knowing when to pre-start the engine to have it ready for action when needed.


Beyond forests, Finland is also famous for being a land of lakes, with a total of 188,000 spread out throughout its territory, a challenge alongside the cold that required participants to adapt their tactic sets to survive, British Lt. Col. Pete Winton, of the multinational field artillery brigade assembled for the exercise, said.

Out here, communication between the different artillery units at all times is fundamental, Brigadier Rob Alston, chief of joint fires and influence at NATO’s Allied Rapid Reaction Corps, said, explaining why the drill involved utilizing multiple means of transmitting data.

“[We do this] so that if our preferred option is not working, we are able to utilize a second or third option so that communications can always get through,” he said during an interview.

While the Finnish Army may have mastered the woods, this does not make it immune to problems in freezing conditions.
Four of the eight K9s deployed for the exercise had broken heaters, a K9 operator, who wished to remain anonymous for security reasons, told Defense News. That meant it was as cold inside the vehicle as outside, with temperatures falling well under the freezing point on that day.

Another challenge faced by participants included the long distances to cross here in Lapland. Taskinen explained that whereas many countries are accustomed to having military infrastructure located close to each other, in this region, often your destination is hundreds of kilometers away.


Guns outside the tent. Check.
Long distances to cross. Check.
Multi-mode data transfer?
188,000 lakes. Check. (2,000,000 of them in Canada)

...

Amphibious vehicles (pretty much everything apparently)


 
My take now is

3x Special Service Force (Regulars)
1x Armoured Brigade
1x Artillery Brigade
Support troops.

The SSFs function as ready forces but also function as the core element to which other troops can be attached to create viable brigades.

Meanwhile there are enough elements there to create 2 divisions. A division could be as small as a reinforced brigade to which allied elements could be attached. Alternately it could be 3 small brigades. With two Div HQs Canada could field both simultaneously.

To succeed at all you'll need to take the 'Special Service' out of that title.

The CAF doesn't respond very well to those words ;)
 
Back
Top