• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The CF and Canadian's Impressions of it...

NovaScotiaNewfie

New Member
Inactive
Reaction score
0
Points
110
Hey all, I was wondering if you think part of the problem behind funding, is Canadians Opinion of the CF as peacekeepers.

I was watching CBC newsworld and they were talking to the NDP Defence Critic and when the topic came up of should we be in  Afghanistan, how long etc they used the magic world "Peacekeeper or peacekeeping".  Does this term "Harm" the CF when it comes to the publics impression of it? To me the bottom line is the CF and all 3 services are there to protect the country. If there is a need then the Military  goes to war  to protect the lives of our country men, our ideals our way of life etc.

Granted no one wants to see our Soldiers, Airmen/women, sailors hurt or killed but when you put on that uniform no matter what trade,, what role you are in you might have to do something in combat. My aunt is in the AF - in logistics believe she does accounting and when she was deployed over to Afghanistan (Or in that part of the world around Afghanistan) I'm sure they had to qualify and train with the C-7 again.

Being an ex member of the RNR (Royal Newfoundland Regiment - Infantry Reserve Battalion) I don't know for sure but I think nor matter what you do, first of all you are trained to use a rifle in case you have to pick up a weapon in an emergency - maybe not so much for the AF and Navy (based on what she did I would think maybe for them also).

Anyhow back to the point if we stopped referring the members of the CF as peace keepers do you think the public would get behind spending more on the CF and be more accepting of Canada getting involved in combat operations?

I know Canada does an excellent job when it comes to peacekeeping, if not the best them I'm sure the CF is up there, but the public I thick they need to see our force as a combat force also. I think the public supports the CF but they need to know what we need, and the role that equipment plays for the CF and then maybe they would ask politicans more questions about why doesn't the CF have this that and the other thing...Maybe if the public viewed the CF for combat missions and roles also then they would support the CF more which would mean more resources for the entire Military - $$$$$, new equipment, etc.

Maybe that's to simplistic a view. Just my 2 cents.


 
Or maybee the general public has no idea what the CF does or represents. Canadian's have never had to hide in their basements from a war so its easier to believe "nothing has happened before so we must be safe".

Its also easier to believe that the government has deliberately chosen to go the path of a total peacekeeping army, rather than the possibility that because of so many defence cuts, we are losing the ability to be true soldiers.

Its sad to say but I think the only way all Canadians will get behind their military, is when their own lives are affected by an act of terrorism.
 
SHELLDRAKE!! said:
Or maybee the general public has no idea what the CF does or represents. Canadian's have never had to hide in their basements from a war so its easier to believe "nothing has happened before so we must be safe".

Its also easier to believe that the government has deliberately chosen to go the path of a total peacekeeping army, rather than the possibility that because of so many defence cuts, we are losing the ability to be true soldiers.

Its sad to say but I think the only way all Canadians will get behind their military, is when their own lives are affected by an act of terrorism.

It is sad to say but thats the ugly truth of it, and what ive been telling people for years when they ask what it will take for the public to get behind the military.
 
Being in favour of us as "peacekeepers" has a very nice warm and fuzzy feel to it.  It really appears to be a means of advocating Canadian involvement  (a good thing!) without taking responsibility for the consequences of sending our troops into dangerous situations.  From my perspective the folks actually undertaking the task are the best ones to determine the nature of the job.  God knows the military, ours and others, have made it clear that traditional peacekeeping doesn't work when lots of people are intent to keep it from happening.
 
Back
Top