Booter
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,333
- Points
- 1,010
That’s actually apparently crazy hard.Wouldn't it just be easier to make it illegal to be a gun toting gangster?

That’s actually apparently crazy hard.Wouldn't it just be easier to make it illegal to be a gun toting gangster?
It already is but I am sure you all are aware what lawyers and judges can do to law.Wouldn't it just be easier to make it illegal to be a gun toting gangster?
Its only overload if they actually cared about the result. It doesn’t matter to them if transfers take 2 hours, 2 days, or 2 years.Seems like it would be rather easy to overload the RCMP with paperwork on this. Bob sells his firearm to Ted. Ted sells his firearm to Nick. Nick sells his firearm back to Bob. Repeat....
They can't even process license renewals before your license expires as it is now
I watched the Public Safety minister's announcement of the implementation of the "not-a-long-gun-registry" registry. It was nauseating to watch how he pandered to the special interest groups in the room who support the Liberal's disarmament agenda. It was also evident when he was talking about "assault-style" firearms that Le Dauphin has taught him well.
You can take that to the bank. Poly, CD4PG, CFGC number in the tens to maybe hundreds of members. The radical fringe minority comprised of CCFR, CSSA, NFA, SFC, OFAH, IPSC Canada etc., number in the hundreds of thousands. But who gets government money to work on gun issues? Not the fringe.I'm pretty sure the CCFR and the CSSA weren't invited to the table.
You can take that to the bank. Poly, CD4PG, CFGC number in the tens to maybe hundreds of members. The radical fringe minority comprised of CCFR, CSSA, NFA, SFC, OFAH, IPSC Canada etc., number in the hundreds of thousands. But who gets government money to work on gun issues? Not the fringe.
I agree with the premise of requiring sellers to confirm that a buyer has a valid firearms license. I would also support keeping records of whom firearms are sold to and who is in possession of them if it weren't for the threat of sweeping firearm confiscations.
I won't knock others for having a different opinion but personally I'd be more than happy to let the government know how many guns I have and what types if I was confident it wouldn't be used against me.
I agree with the premise of requiring sellers to confirm that a buyer has a valid firearms license. I would also support keeping records of whom firearms are sold to and who is in possession of them if it weren't for the threat of sweeping firearm confiscations.
I won't knock others for having a different opinion but personally I'd be more than happy to let the government know how many guns I have and what types if I was confident it wouldn't be used against me.
This right here.Some members of our community are our worst enemies.
I would not use the term difficult -- I would use the term safe, and practical...I actually think our licensing should be more difficult. And should incorporate practical competence for range safety and marksmanship.
I don't mind registration in theory - however, generally it has been used poorly in most countries in the past.I also don't mind a registration as long as it's free and won't be used as a confiscation tool.
I think the punishment needs to fit the crime, the fact remains that Canada's Legal gun owners aren't the issue -- all the gun laws in Canada do is piss off law abiding owners. Canada already lets some folks who shouldn't have guns, have guns for sustenance reasons, despite they are habitual offenders, and then the government uses those stats again the law abiding crowd.Also punishments for dangerous misuse of a firearm should come with automatic life time bans of legal ownership.
I can honestly say that about a majority of LE and Mil folks - who theoretically have passed an "intensive" firearms training course(s).All me and elitist if you want but I remember my PAL and RPAL courses... There were definitely some folks who I wouldn't want to share space with if there were firearms about.