The Great Gun Control Debate- 2.0

[KevinB]

Technically they had another party make them under a marking variance with ATF as they don’t actually make guns. They have an FFL/SOT so are legally a manufacturer, with the understanding they don’t physically manufacture them.

It was a fairly small run done, IIRC 3 or 4 different times over the years. (insurance is a hassle if you do more than 100 over a few years, and aren’t in the scale production to offset it it with volume sales).

 

[Halifax Tar]

Its called 'compromise'

If the price to be paid for getting Quebec inline for a pipeline or two, along with a LNG refinery to be built in/across Quebec is continuing to move forward on the Gun confiscation program, is that a compromise worth doing?

I have no dog in the gun confiscation fight, but if I had to pick 1 - continue as is in the previous gun ownership laws or have 2 pipelines be built across Ontario and Quebec, with one of them results in a new export driven LNG facility in Quebec and the other ending up at the Irving facility in NB - guess which one I'm going to chose to allow to happen and which I'm not.

Which of these results in a 'win' for the vast majority of Canadians and which does not? On BOTH sides there are 'losers' but which one drives the most economic gains and has the majority of Canadians behind it?

That's some impressive gymnastics.

So to get Quebec onside the rest of Canada has to give legally owned property ?

If this is where we are Canada is a failed country already.

 

[QV]

That's some impressive gymnastics.

So to get Quebec onside the rest of Canada has to give legally owned property ?

If this is where we are Canada is a failed country already.

If Quebec wants the gun confiscation so bad, then have a gun confiscation in Quebec and leave everyone else alone. Win win.

 

[Halifax Tar]

If Quebec wants the gun confiscation so bad, then have a gun confiscation in Quebec and leave everyone else alone. Win win.

As I said up thread, perhaps its time the Feds admit this needs to be a provincial matter and let the provinces handle it individually.

 

[ArmyRick]

you just have to not want to get shot by some nut job

And nut jobs don't use knives, baseball bats, cars, etc to kill people? Someone wants to to kill for whatever reason, they will do it.

 

[KevinB]

And nut jobs don't use knives, baseball bats, cars, etc to kill people? Someone wants to to kill for whatever reason, they will do it.

I think his point was more that sending the Army to get guns was a fools errand and would result in resistance.

 

[Eaglelord17]

As I said up thread, perhaps its time the Feds admit this needs to be a provincial matter and let the provinces handle it individually.

That would be the worst thing that could happen. Quebec shouldn’t even be allowed to have it’s own registry.

It is better to have one standard across the country, it is one of our strongest points as a country. The key is not having a stupid standard.

 

[Genetk44]

In Quebec part of the problem, if you want to call it that, is that a small, hard-core group of anti-gun urban intellectuals and politicians use the annual anniversary of the École Polytechnique massacre as a refresher to increase the anti-gun rhetoric and to refocus the urban majority onto the subject. If you’re anywhere in Quebec , but especially in the Montreal region the whole issue of guns,gun control and banning guns gets re-hashed in the various news media starting a few weeks before the anniversery date unti a few weeks after…and everybody gets all anti-gun again.

 

[Halifax Tar]

That would be the worst thing that could happen. Quebec shouldn’t even be allowed to have it’s own registry.

It is better to have one standard across the country, it is one of our strongest points as a country. The key is not having a stupid standard.

The only people that would suck for would be Quebec. That's a Quebec problem, it's shouldn't involve me in NS. Or Bob in BC.

 

[OldSolduer]

The only people that would suck for would be Quebec. That's a Quebec problem, it's shouldn't involve me in NS. Or Bob in BC.

Or Mike from Canmore

 

[Eaglelord17]

In Quebec part of the problem, if you want to call it that, is that a small, hard-core group of anti-gun urban intellectuals and politicians use the annual anniversary of the École Polytechnique massacre as a refresher to increase the anti-gun rhetoric and to refocus the urban majority onto the subject. If you’re anywhere in Quebec , but especially in the Montreal region the whole issue of guns,gun control and banning guns gets re-hashed in the various news media starting a few weeks before the anniversery date unti a few weeks after…and everybody gets all anti-gun again.

It is fascinating to me they keep beating that dead horse.

Literally occurred before I was born and we have had serious legislative changes since then.

If that is all you can reference you don’t actually have a problem.

 

[Genetk44]

It is fascinating to me they keep beating that dead horse.

Literally occurred before I was born and we have had serious legislative changes since then.

If that is all you can reference you don’t actually have a problem.

Agreed…it’s really tedious

 

[Furniture]

It is fascinating to me they keep beating that dead horse.

Literally occurred before I was born and we have had serious legislative changes since then.

If that is all you can reference you don’t actually have a problem.

They have an effective emotional string to pull, and that is far better in politics than facts or reality.

 

[Genetk44]

They have an effective emotional string to pull, and that is far better in politics than facts or reality.

Bingo!