GO!!! said:
When did he go from Canadian citizen who grew up here to hapless immigrant who made connections with the wrong people? How was he unable to establish himself financially from the age of 17 to 37? Are you telling me a civil engineer is unable to establish a credit rating without outside help?
I obviously haven't seen his lease, or know why it called for a cosigner, but your argument doesn't say anything either. If he had a great credit rating or money, and knew Almalki was a fellow terrorist, why the heck would he unnecessarily add his name to his lease? Is it some big Al-Qaeda in joke? It doesn't make any sense.
Dangerous offenders are now subject to the "reverse onus" system in which they must prove that they are not dangerous, and they are detained until they can do so - just for an exercise in theory, apply it to the Arar case. He can't prove that he is not a terrorist.
Dangerous offenders have already been convicted of a crime, Arar never was. Of course he can't prove he isn't a terrorist. I can't prove I'm not a terrorist. You can't prove you aren't a terrorist - in fact, you might be the best one yet, killing your less important fellow terrorists to win the trust and respect of the infidels. I think we can at least agree that we'd prefer to live in a society that followed the innocent until proven guilty, burden of proof rests with the accuser rule, rather than a constant witch hunt.
Once again, is he a born and raised Canadian citizen, as you claim? Or is he a fearful immigrant, scared of every uniform in every country? You can't have it both ways - which is he?
There are a lot of Canadians who are at least anxious of people in uniforms. He came here at 17, which is getting pretty old to move fro m one civilization to another. He was obviously making a life here but there's a huge culture gap that is hard to adjust to and he seems to have mostly stuck to his fellow Muslims in social situations. Either way, it indicates a nervous disposition as much as it does any kind of guilt.
There was no precedent for 9/11 either - but it happened.
He was sent back - to the country of his birth, in which he retained his citizenship, of his own free will, for two decades.
....and yet he was unable to establish enough credit to lease an apartment or sufficient cash reserves, even whilst working as an engineer?
He became a Canadian citizen in 1991. That means he's afforded all the rights of the Constitution and Charter. If the government has some dirt on him, they are obligated to deal with it in a legal manner, they can't just turf him abroad to his country of second citizenship.
ALSO
It's not fair to say he happily held onto his Syrian citizenship, as Syria makes it very difficult to actually renounce it.
Quote from a US government report available at
http://www.opm.gov/extra/investigate/IS-01.pdf
Though voluntary renunciation of Syrian citizenship is permitted by law, the Syrian Information Office stated that it is so complicated that it is best not to attempt the process. In effect, according to that Office, the process is complicated in order to discourage renunciation of Syrian citizenship. Former citizens of Syria probably maintain an unofficial dual citizenship status and would be subject to Syrian law as citizens should they return to Syria.
I've been detained and questioned before - and promptly released - because I was telling the truth. I did'nt feel the need for a lawyer because I had truthful explanations for everything I did. What did he have to hide?
He's probably going to kick himself over this for the rest of his life, sure. But there was obviously a Muslim-terrorist hunt on at the time, race card or not, it's not like everyone was equally considered a target right after 9/11. Having a lawyer is a right, requesting one being present at an interview should not automatically label him as a terrorist. I've also been detained, and if its something easy to disprove like, no, I did not break into that family's house and rob them at gunpoint, since, I'm a two feet taller than the man they saw and covered in tattoos, I wouldn't ask for a lawyer (and didn't). If someone wanted to start asking me about all my friends, I'd be freaked out enough to demand one.
Let's say GO!!!, a white, anglo male, working as an engineer in Canada for two decades, after emigrating from Ireland, has an associate who is a full patch member of the Hell's Angels. He (for some reason) is unable to secure a lease, and his biker friend helps him out. A month later, his biker friend organises the bombing of a police station, and GO!!!, simultaneously and at the same time, sells his house and prepares to move his family to the Grand Cayman islands - on vacation (even though he can't afford a house). When questioned by the authorities, GO!!! immediately lawyers up and leaves the country. At this point, a third party sends him back to Ireland, on the basis of the suspicion the Canadian authorities have. GO!!! claims he is tortured there, and demands compensation from the Canadian government to the tune of hundreds of times his annual wages. Rubes take his claims at face value with no substantiation and a self flagellating Canadian press sides with GO!!!.
It still doesn't work. In fact your story actually reflects a lot of the assumptions that were made about Arar, instead of sending somebody out to double check. They happened to stumble across Almalki's name on his lease and decided he must be in cahoots. Then when he let the lease on his townhouse expire, and went to stay with family in Tunisia (for free!) as he had done many times before, they put into the report that he had sold his house, a house he never owned. That's a lot different then giving up a lease, maybe he wanted to move to a bigger place when he got back, it was a convenient way to do it without renting an empty house. He also left some time after the RCMP declined to interview him, it was not right after as was apparently indicated in files on him. Then the RCMP passed on information to a third party which specifically said he was a terrorist, not that they had some blanks to fill in, or were suspicious. If they had wanted to investigate, they could have just waited for him to fly from New York to Ottawa and arrested him then. It makes no sense why they passed it on to the Americans, especially in the form they did.
As an added bonus, it actually turns out Almalki was innocent too, he also went to jail in Syria,
won a bunch of money from the Syrian government, and is now living back in Canada free as a bird, and CSIS and the RCMP don't seem to have a problem with him anymore.
And I just want to add, I don't think he deserves that much money. I don't know what a fair amount is but that strikes me as a lot.
I think at the very least he deserved the apologies he received, and now deserves that his name be cleared. The inquiry should have done that.
CSIS knows the importance of gaining the trust of diaspora communities to break terrorist plots domestically. They are also quite proud of their continuing efforts to reach out to and develop positive relationships with these groups. It seems that such help was critical in breaking the Toronto terrorist plot early this year. They especially need the help of Muslim-Canadians, and aren't doing the cause any favors by accidentally deporting their friends. If we want them to feel confident enough and proud enough of their Canadian citizenships to step up and help defend the country, we have to prove that if we do make mistakes we're at least willing to make them right. Branding every suspect a terrorist for the rest of their lives is not a positive step.
CSIS participated in the Inquiry, they say Arar is clean. That should be good enough for every Canadian to accept.
The money is for the politicians to figure out, his innocence is confirmed.
Edited to reflect my inaccurate claim that Almalki won a settlement form Syria...what was I thinking...