Interesting take from the admittedly somewhat biased Billie Flynn. Some good points are made, however:
The RCAF's Next Generation Fighter (CF-188 Replacement)
- Thread starter WingsofFury
- Start date
- Reaction score
- 1,771
- Points
- 1,060
Well I think he's wrong on a few pointsInteresting take from the admittedly somewhat biased Billie Flynn. Some good points are made, however:
1. original order book was for 80 not 65, I think it was the Harper gov't that reduced it not Chretien
2. the 88 fighters are derived from the same planning assumptions as the 65 required to meet our NORAD comittments just with an additional 12 fighters to meet concurrent NATO/NORAD duties
3. This statement seems mostly true to me
More (88 instead of 65), cheaper ($78M instead of $110M), better (Block 4 instead of Block 3), and best ROI (better than 4 to 1) sounds like an incredibly well executed plan even more so with the US ‘Build Back Better’ trend to see Canada get a better deal and squeeze everything from those pesky, insular Yankees.
IMO
Was it the right behaviour from a ally and partner nation, when all other partner nations ponied up for earlier block versions? No
Are we probably wasting our time, money, and personnel with the competition? Yeah probably
Was buying the Australian F-18's a mistake? Yes
Is it a mistake to proceed with the next F-18 update instead of accelerating a F-35 buy? Yes
Agree with everything you said.
Minus one thing…
Our sheer incompetence has actually put us in a better spot than we were.
You mentioned was it right for us to wait so long while other partner nations placed orders for earlier versions.
By virtue, I agree with you.
But by doddling this long, we will be getting far more capable jets than if we had bought a few years ago. Better jets in all tangible ways.
It’s a shame it’s by accident. But it is what it is. How much money will other nations have to come up with to update their older jets?
Overall, agree with everything you stated and the sentiment of your post.
- Reaction score
- 2,048
- Points
- 1,260
How will these numbers hold up over the next 30+ yrs with attrition naturally occurring over this time period? Will we not reach a time when we will no longer have enough planes to meet our commitments listed above?
Edit: From what I can see we lost a min. of 20 CF-188’s since they went operational here. If the same attrition rate occurs we can expect to lose 14/15 planes, putting us below of required NORAD commitments, with 0 planes left for any NATO duties.
Last edited:
- Reaction score
- 2,048
- Points
- 1,260
Anonymous F-35 Customer Is Getting A New Variant Of The Stealth Jet
An intriguing contract announcement reveals Lockheed Martin is working to design and develop a bespoke F-35 version for a foreign customer.
www.thedrive.com
Any chance this is for a Canadianized variant?
MilEME09
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,866
- Points
- 1,210
Unlikely, unless we get an announcement really soon, my money is on IsraelAnonymous F-35 Customer Is Getting A New Variant Of The Stealth Jet
An intriguing contract announcement reveals Lockheed Martin is working to design and develop a bespoke F-35 version for a foreign customer.
Any chance this is for a Canadianized variant?
Weinie
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,515
- Points
- 1,140
Good supposition. I read somewhere that Israel made more than 2000 mods to the F-4, which they received from the US beginning in 1969. Their Super Phantom, which they developed in 1987 (but never deployed) was phenomenal.
GR66
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 4,269
- Points
- 1,160
I doubt it...nowhere in the article does it mention the bespoke variant being unarmed, built in Quebec, or gender neutral.Anonymous F-35 Customer Is Getting A New Variant Of The Stealth Jet
An intriguing contract announcement reveals Lockheed Martin is working to design and develop a bespoke F-35 version for a foreign customer.
Any chance this is for a Canadianized variant?
- Reaction score
- 22,785
- Points
- 1,360
$49M for a bilingual OFP? Could be.Anonymous F-35 Customer Is Getting A New Variant Of The Stealth Jet
An intriguing contract announcement reveals Lockheed Martin is working to design and develop a bespoke F-35 version for a foreign customer.
Any chance this is for a Canadianized variant?
MilEME09
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,866
- Points
- 1,210
If that were true someone finally used their head and went straight to final negotiations with Lockheed
- Reaction score
- 1,757
- Points
- 1,140
"Warlock 2, Renard 3, tournez la manivelle vers l'ouest."
"Warlock 4, lichette"
armrdsoul77
Full Member
- Reaction score
- 477
- Points
- 930
Quirky
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,791
- Points
- 1,260
"And going to Europe to buy the next fighter jet would be stepping outside decades of alignment with the U.S., particularly when it comes to continental defence, Perry said — which could lead to repercussions for the bilateral relationship between Canada and the U.S."
European countries aren't even buying the gripen. It's been an underperforming embarrassment in every competition it's entered and primarily designed for 2nd and 3rd world developing countries.....
Can't wait to see the circus when we pick it.
MilEME09
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,866
- Points
- 1,210
I'll admit the E/F Gripen tries to up its abilities, but absolutely, Canada isn't Sweden, our defense needs are extremely different. If we pick it, I'll be shocked but not surprised, we procurement equipment buy counter how many votes a project can buy, not its value as military equipment
The costs for the latest Gripen appear to be now about the same as the F35 at least thats what the Thai military has said. The irony of this entire journey has been the constant downgrade an increase in cost for all aircraft other then the F35. The original Super Hornet Bid was billing a cheaper plan but with stealth features added while the Griphen was also supposed to have stealth features while also being much cheaper allowing for many more planes being built in Canada. Now the Super Hornet will not get another block upgrade and the Griphen are the same price while having no stealth features while only being assembled in Nova Scotia.
Quirky
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,791
- Points
- 1,260
"adding on" stealth features onto a 4th gen non-stealthy aircraft is a hilarious concept. It's like dressing up your son with girl clothing, this doesn't make him a girl. Then again its 2022 so who knows anymore.
MilEME09
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 2,866
- Points
- 1,210
Making a Gen 4.5 with a reduced radar profile isn't that laughable, you are taking Gen 5 tech and applying it to a proven airframe as an upgrade. It is a viable option
Quirky
Army.ca Veteran
- Reaction score
- 3,791
- Points
- 1,260
When the Gen 5 costs less and isn't a pig with lipstick, there's no point other than buying something that "looks" like what we have now.
