• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The RCAF's Next Generation Fighter (CF-188 Replacement)

Expanding the RCAF doesn't have to mean a split fighter fleet. Personally I'm in favour of more than the planned 88 x F-35's. In a counter-intuitive way I think that increasing the fleet size could actually help with the personnel issues on the pilot side.

There doesn't appear to be any lack of people interested in becoming fighter pilots and with improved training throughput you should be able to fill the positions required. So long as you don't increase the number of Squadons/Wings, etc. to take on those aircraft then the ratio of non-flying to flying positions would decrease. That could help retention of those wish to remain flying rather than moving on to staff positions.

Where I see the biggest problem is the technical support for a larger fleet. Misguided educational policies over the last decades have unfortunately directed young people away from the trades and toward more academic education. So it's not just difficult to to find AVN techs, it's hard to find plumbers, stone masons, welders and CNC operators.

On the positive side I think governments have recognized the problem and slowly (verrrrryyyy slowly) more effort is being put into directing young people into the trades. The CAF could play an active part in this in training new techs at an increased scale (working with educational institutes) to build up the trade.
There are a whole lot of people who are betting on war within 5 years; 10 at the most. We should have started planning, training, and buying at least 5 years ago. I will defer to the air force as to what a/c they need to take into battle but 88 only meets our peacetime requirements where casualties are rare. If we can't get more F35s in that time line then we need to chase after a split fleet even if it is a couple of squadrons of Eagles to use as bomb trucks as the others come on line. The same argument applies to navy and army as well. Every shipyard in Canada should be involved in increasing our fleet
 
(been looking at the Rafale recently would be ok, maybe the f16 Israeli latest spec).
Personally I would take the Rafale over the Gripen purely on looks...

The Rafale is just sexy. Period.


Even if it was as tactically useful as a baked potato, I'd still pick that jet on sheer sex appeal
 
Back
Top