OldSolduer
Army.ca Relic
- Reaction score
- 20,387
- Points
- 1,260
So not being an expert on fighters (Infantry so not really an expert on anything) what is THE BEST fighter jet currently available in the world, that we can access?

What neighbourhood is your country and what do you want to do with your fighter force?So not being an expert on fighters (Infantry so not really an expert on anything) what is THE BEST fighter jet currently available in the world, that we can access?
My thought is that we proceed with all 88 F 35s and perhaps option another 44.What neighbourhood is your country and what do you want to do with your fighter force?
There is no one answer to that question.
It depends for what purposes. NORAD? F-15EX IMO. Exped? F-35ASo not being an expert on fighters (Infantry so not really an expert on anything) what is THE BEST fighter jet currently available in the world, that we can access?
Brits still proceeding with AJAX
Introduced something new to me...
20 40 40
20% Survival Layer
40% Attritable/Reusable Layer
40% Consumable Layer
Survival Layer - Conventional Weapons (Challenger, Artillery, Attack Helicopters (Ajax))
Attritable/Reusable Layer - High End Surveillance, Reconnaissance Drones, AI Enabled
Consumable Layer - Loitering Munitions, Kamikaze Drones
Presumably that is the budget effort.
Next iteration will be
How many 300,000 USD cruise missiles will be bought?
How many 3,000,000 USD recoverable Valkyries will be bought?
How many 30,000,000 reusable CCAs will be bought?
How many 300,000,000 Gen 6s like GCAP will be bought?
the go-to substitute seems to be the Raphael. How would it compare for a NORAD role? Is it compatible and does it have the legs for northern dispersal? And finally, would it work for maintenance and service in an austere environment?It depends for what purposes. NORAD? F-15EX IMO. Exped? F-35A
the go-to substitute seems to be the Raphael. How would it compare for a NORAD role? Is it compatible and does it have the legs for northern dispersal? And finally, would it work for maintenance and service in an austere environment?
Patiently waiting to hear if there’s an upside….?That's the downside of having lots of Toronto Maple Leafs fans in decision making positions.
Solid Golf game?Patiently waiting to hear if there’s an upside….?
Built in optimism? That tends to get taken to far though in risk acceptance, making Pollyanna look like Debbie downer.Patiently waiting to hear if there’s an upside….?
Maybe so but this shift sits squarely in the lap of the present US administration which has become unreliable and maybe even threatening as a partner. Canada will not be the only nation who will divest itself of ties to the US military industrial complex. Be careful of where you point your finger unless it's at the mirror.The engines are but a minor part of the ITAR controlled aspects in that jet.
Yeah Canada way to go, yet another orphan fleet.
FFS, y'all need to change Stand on Guard for Thee, to Snatching Defeat from the jaws of Victory.
So, like these guys, then??Built in optimism? That tends to get taken to far though in risk acceptance, making Pollyanna look like Debbie downer.
You can dependably make fun of them in the playoffs I guess when the Leafs choke I guess, but not really any real upsides. Plus if the Leafs ever win a cup again they will be insufferable for decades.
NORAD is all about interoperability with the US. The Rafale does not give that.the go-to substitute seems to be the Raphael. How would it compare for a NORAD role? Is it compatible and does it have the legs for northern dispersal? And finally, would it work for maintenance and service in an austere environment?
If a bunch of the aircrafts systems and avionics are ITAR, what good does swapping the engine do?Maybe so but this shift sits squarely in the lap of the present US administration which has become unreliable and maybe even threatening as a partner. Canada will not be the only nation who will divest itself of ties to the US military industrial complex. Be careful of where you point your finger unless it's at the mirror.
If a bunch of the aircrafts systems and avionics are ITAR, what good does swapping the engine do?
Right now in the F-35 you have a top notch aircraft that has Canadian Made content.
The current administration is a big fucking mess, I agree, but I think tossing out the best options for Canada for a short sighted snub is a poor idea.
X-Wing. Always the X-Wing.So not being an expert on fighters (Infantry so not really an expert on anything) what is THE BEST fighter jet currently available in the world, that we can access?
Don't believe that the end result, if this Saab Gripen spin is ultimately correct, would be Canada 'tossing out the best options for Canada' but a pivot towards 2 distinct sets of fighters. My guess, and its a guess, is that we'll continue forward with a reduced number of F35's into the future as well as the Gripen, with or without Rolls-Royce engines.If a bunch of the aircrafts systems and avionics are ITAR, what good does swapping the engine do?
Right now in the F-35 you have a top notch aircraft that has Canadian Made content.
The current administration is a big fucking mess, I agree, but I think tossing out the best options for Canada for a short sighted snub is a poor idea.
'Over perceived politics' - Please elaborate.Really dumb things have been done in the name of politics. I fully expect something dumb to happen with this F-35 thing over perceived politics.
