I‘d like that kind of guarantee for myself... it‘s not like all humans die a painless and "humane" death.Originally posted by brin11:
[qb] If the sealers can guarantee that they will not suffer and that their deaths will be humane I don‘t have a major problem with it. [/qb]
Of course, I‘d like that guarantee as well. Unfortunately, we don‘t all have a humane death but does that mean that we should make animals suffer? The two don‘t go hand in hand. I‘m speaking as someone in the animal health industry here so I see animal suffering everyday. Their welfare is my bread and butter which is where I‘m coming from. We are the stewards of the earth (and I‘m not talking biblical here, simply that we seem to be the most numerous/highest life form) and it is our responsibility to ensure that when we "use" animals that we do it in the most humane ways possible. We make decisions about killing these animals for whatever reasons that have nothing to do with our survival where the other animals do it simply to survive. I don‘t believe any of you who agree with the seal hunt wish the animals to suffer and scream in agony during their death regardless of some of the macho statements I‘ve read here.I‘d like that kind of guarantee for myself... it‘s not like all humans die a painless and "humane" death.
This is a silly statement. Some people choose to support the welfare of people (ie. sponsoring a child in Africa) while others choose to support the welfare of animals. Some do both or neither. They have nothing to do with each other.Until humans aren‘t getting killed in horrific, inhuman ways, why all the commotion over seals? Why don‘t the protestors go and sponsor a child in Africa?