• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The War in Ukraine

Have there been any discussions surrounding drone use and the Geneva conventions?

A couple videos come to mind where a drone hovers over a surrendering soldier for 10 to 15 second and then drops a bomb on them appearing to kill them.

In another a soldier is surrendering and the drone hovers again for a little bit, almost like taunting the guy, before flying into the dudes head.
 
Have there been any discussions surrounding drone use and the Geneva conventions?

A couple videos come to mind where a drone hovers over a surrendering soldier for 10 to 15 second and then drops a bomb on them appearing to kill them.

In another a soldier is surrendering and the drone hovers again for a little bit, almost like taunting the guy, before flying into the dudes head.

Something from the US perspective.


 
Have there been any discussions surrounding drone use and the Geneva conventions?

A couple videos come to mind where a drone hovers over a surrendering soldier for 10 to 15 second and then drops a bomb on them appearing to kill them.

In another a soldier is surrendering and the drone hovers again for a little bit, almost like taunting the guy, before flying into the dudes head.

Don't see how that would be much different than trying to surrender to a fighter jet, or something more similar like an attack helicopter. Though there have been several instances now of surrendering to a drone actually working, though that seems to be more likely if it's a bomber type drone and not a one way like an FPV.
 
dont know who got fired, they were threatening to layoff design personnel without further orders

By February 2023 they had produced 86
February 2024 it was up to 118
February 2025 ???
Maybe have them design a 4x4 LAV to replace the TAPV, in whatever role that is supposed to be. It's been done in the past.
330px-MOWAG_Piranha_4x4.JPG
 
RuAF can't catch a break. Also seems to be implying that this was an in person raid 400km inside Russia, waiting for more details.


And here's the announcement from the official General Staff of the Armed Forces of Ukraine Telegram account.
 
GDLSC needs to either market their platform overseas and get more orders. They need to redesign/design a platform with tracks, artillery turrets and maybe a 50 ton tank.
 
GDLS already has a lot of variants and is selling Stryker's offshore.
You need to remember that GDLS-C is simply a Canadian subsidiary off the US parent.
But the US took manufacturing away from the Canadian plant years ago.
 
Anyone waiting for Trump to get tough with Putin will be waiting a while.


This Week In The Sanctions Pantomime

Of course Trump’s threat of sanctions against Ukraine was not just a sign of escalation fears—probably more important it was part of the ongoing pantomime of Trump wanting to seem tough on Russia but always, always, finding ways not to do anything against Putin when the time comes. Remember it was two weeks ago Sunday (tomorrow) that Trump called Putin “absolutely CRAZY”and threatened to get tough on the Russian leader if Putin did not show commitment to the peace process.

Btw, the two-week deadline that Trump then issued a few days later, is looming—are you excited?

This week the pantomime involved Trump trying to neuter the Senate bill threatening Russia with sanctions, the one sponsored by Senators Blumenthal and Graham.

Trump really hates this bill, but cannot admit to that publicly. The bill actually would give him everything he would need to try and get Putin in line—were he so inclined. It empowers the President to put crippling economic sanctions on states/countries that do energy business with Russia. It would thus allow the US to economic neuter anyone doing business with Putin’s war machine.

So what did we see this week? Well behind the scenes Trump is trying to make sure the bill either does not get a vote or, if it does, that is it crystal clear that he and only he can decide whether to impose such sanctions. His threat to have sanctions on Ukraine and Russia is another way that he can maneuver around the bill if he wanted.

I am detecting, finally, that people seem to understand this. Trump will never put harsh sanctions on Putin unless the Republican Party stages an outright rebellion against his pro-Russian positions (and even then he might resist). So far, the party is nowhere near that.

Cant wait to see what happens this week in the pantomime.
 
He’s not really wrong though. All Canada was left with was domestic sales.
Canada doesn’t buy enough of anything too keep the doors open for long.

Another reason to thank Uncle Sam.
Single sourcing the western defence industry.
 
Well the fact there is one, you also may want to thank us.
A little less sarcastically than your original comment too.

The US and the west had a much more innovative and resilient military industrial complex in the 1960s and 70s than it has now after the post Cold War consolidation.

That consolidation has not been good for any government.
 
The US and the west had a much more innovative and resilient military industrial complex in the 1960s and 70s than it has now after the post Cold War consolidation.

That consolidation has not been good for any government.
And why is that?
Because in 1990 the rest of NATO set their dial to ‘abdicate responsibility’.

Heck even in the US look at the companies that had to merge simply to survive, or how many major companies divested their defense products to other companies.
 
Back
Top