• Thanks for stopping by. Logging in to a registered account will remove all generic ads. Please reach out with any questions or concerns.

The War in Ukraine

50 meters strikes me as being awfully close to being a Hail Mary shot but I am guessing you need one last crack at it.

That seems to be well within the range of successful shootdowns even with a shotgun, remember these things are small and fast. This is supposed to fill the gap if EW and anti-drone drones fail and to give troops a fighting chance without having to lug around an additional weapon with its own ammunition.

 
Interesting. I wonder if the same principle could be applied to the 25x137mm for the LAV's M242.

Happened at least twice on film but with Bradleys. Programmable air burst munitions already exist in the 25mm range, though that'll be an expensive solution to $500 drones. Flechette canisters would be closer to what Ukraine has created.



In other news. Believe it when I see it.

Trump to announce "aggressive" Ukraine weapons plan

Two sources told Axios they had reason to believe the plan was likely to include long-range missiles that could reach targets deep inside Russian territory, including Moscow. However, neither was aware of any final decision.

Possibly related to this that I posted on Wednesday in the Political Impacts thread, SCALP production is getting spun back up.

 

I'd heard about the Programmable munitions and both the expense and limitations of the 25mm round due to size (hard to fit a sensor and a useful load apparently, thus the interest in 30 mm, both 113 and 173)

I was curious about the nature of the "submunitions" in the 5.56 round. I am assuming it doesn't require any gadgetry on the rifle.
 
I was curious about the nature of the "submunitions" in the 5.56 round. I am assuming it doesn't require any gadgetry on the rifle.
I’m guessing this is a multiplex round.

Multiple segments that are fitted loosely together front to rear and separate upon leaving the barrel.

OLIN had a patent for the 5.56mm Colt ACR program on a duplex projectile.

During GWOT David Tubb had made some subsonic 7.62 NATO Duplex rounds designed to cycle semiauto rifles - I still have some, the second projectile was generally within 6” at 100m, so not ideal for sentry removal, and .300Blackout was about to do the subsonic role. He had to stay away from 5.56mm due to Olin/Winchesters patent.

My assumption is it is like those, just adding more segment but instead of being like a bullet and similar in weight to a single 5.56mm projectile, in the duplex, these would be around 15-20grains each.

Some companies had tried to make Tri-Plex rounds, with basically a 1/3rd segment of the round (cut from face on)- some had a thin jacket over the segments but generally they tended to fly apart once leaving the muzzle and no discernible pattern was observable. Thicker jackets where tried to make the bullet come apart drastically when hitting something - but generally due to low weight of the segments little penetration was achieved but with significant surface wounding and a large diameter area just under the impact point.
 
That seems to be well within the range of successful shootdowns even with a shotgun, remember these things are small and fast.
Most shotguns are 10m and in for this sort of work.




This is supposed to fill the gap if EW and anti-drone drones fail and to give troops a fighting chance without having to lug around an additional weapon with its own ammunition.
Makes sense, I am however somewhat skeptical based on my own experiences with multiple projectile ammunition.
 
50 meters strikes me as being awfully close to being a Hail Mary shot but I am guessing you need one last crack at it.
True, but remember the old days of "Aircraft Action Right/Left" and having everybody fire their FN's in a mad rapid fire wall of lead as a last resort against aircraft? If nothing else is working ...
 
True, but remember the old days of "Aircraft Action Right/Left" and having everybody fire their FN's in a mad rapid fire wall of lead as a last resort against aircraft? If nothing else is working ...
Yes things designed to make troops feel like they may have a chance.

:unsure:
 
Well this is a surprising turn. Very much sounds like a breakup with Daddy P, just need to wait and see if this new bark has bite.

Trump asked Zelenskiy if Ukraine could hit Moscow, FT reports
@Remius @brihard

Now that it has become a little clearer from the last article, putting this in here since an actual weapon system has been name dropped.

 
While I wish in my underdog heart of hearts POTUS47 is having a change of heart on which horse to back, I’ve seen him flip flop too much to hold out much long term hope. Happy to be wrong, though. 🤞
He seems to have really had a bad breakup with Vlad, that is going to make Vlad very very sad.

He seems to have adopted (better late than never) the approach he had before in his first term by making peace much more palatable than War, but supplying Ukraine with weapons and training that make Russian aggression very painful to Russia.
 
@Remius @brihard

Now that it has become a little clearer from the last article, putting this in here since an actual weapon system has been name dropped.

How feasible would it be for the Ukkies to reverse engineer a Tomahawk missile if Trump sent them some. Would this be sensible for them try and and do this?
 
How feasible would it be for the Ukkies to reverse engineer a Tomahawk missile if Trump sent them some. Would this be sensible for them try and and do this?
Physically, Tomahawk‘s a 40+ year old system. The missile itself is probably well within their capabilities to match or surpass. I would have to think the magic is in the navigation/guidance/targeting software, and integrating it with launch systems of aircraft.
 
Back
Top